Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.41s
Brown v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
112 A.D. 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublished271 A.D.2d 222 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1946
(Landau v. Herts Drivurself Stations, Inc., 237 App. Div. 141 ; Great Northern R. Co. v. Fowler, 136 Fed. 118, 121 .) … (Farrington v. Harlem Savings Bank, 280 N. Y; 1; Dominicis v. United States Casualty Co., 132 App. Div. 553, 556 ; Landau v. Herts Drivurself Stations, Inc., 237 *224 App. Div. 141; Kirchner v. N. H. S. M. Co., 135 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteuben County Department of Social Services v. Brown
54 A.D.2d 1138 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1976
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
98 N.Y.S. 1098 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 7, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad
54 N.Y.S. 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 1898
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoniello v. Niagara County Board of Elections
131 A.D.3d 808 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 19, 2015
Same memorandum as in Matter of Boniello v Niagara County Bd. of Elections ([appeal No. 1] 131 AD3d 806 [2015]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Sconiers, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBodanza v. Public Employment Relations Board
119 A.D.2d 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 17, 1986
It is well settled that "PERB’s jurisdiction encompasses only those matters specifically covered by the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law art 14]” (Matter of Zuckerman v Board of Educ., 44 NY2d 336 , 343). … Professions v Newman, 86 AD2d 734 , lv denied 56 NY2d 504 ; Matter of United Univ. Professions v Newman, 77 AD2d 709 , lv denied 51 NY2d 707 ; see generally, Chicago Teachers Union v Hudson, 475 US —, 89 L Ed 2d 232 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedCaruso v. Board of Collective Bargaining
161 A.D.2d 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 17, 1990
Decision and order number B-64-88 of the respondent Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York which, following a hearing, determined that the topic of a February 17, 1987 directive by the Police Commissioner … (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 [1974].)
Cited 0 timesPublishedRosenberg v. Board of Standards & Appeals
286 A.D. 1019 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1955
Cited 1 timesPublishedRagsdale v. Board of Education
256 A.D. 1056 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1939
(See Matter of Farrar v. Board of Education, 254 App. Div. 733 .) Settle order on notice. Present — ' Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpellens v. Community School Board No. 19
48 A.D.2d 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1975
v Board of Educ. of City of N. … The above authorities have not been overruled, insofar as the situation at bar is concerned, by Board of Regents v Roth ( 408 US 564 ) and Perry v Sindermann ( 408 US 593 ) (Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of City of N.
Cited 6 timesPublished254 A.D. 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 1938
Act, § 440; Sautter v. Frick, 227 App. Div. 760 ; Conklin v. Currie, 235 id. 703; Gilman v. Prentice, 132 N. Y. 488 ; Ventimiglia v. Eichner, 213 id. 147.)
Cited 0 timesPublished254 A.D. 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1938
(Wood v. City of New York, 274 N. Y. 155 ; Farrell v. City of Buffalo, 118 App. Div. 597 .) The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendant, and the petition dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBradley v. Board of Assessment Review
198 A.D.2d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1993
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Bradley v Board of Assessment Review ([appeal No. 1] 198 AD2d 766— [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J. — Tax Assessment.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedGiava v. Zoning Board of Appeals
188 A.D.2d 466 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1992
, or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441 ; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 40 NY2d 309 ). … The zoning board’s determination will ordinarily be sustained if the determination has a rational basis (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, supra, at 444).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWestmount International Hotels, Inc. v. Sear-Brown Associates
106 A.D.2d 861 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1984
Sear-Brown had an ongoing consulting relationship with plaintiffs in the course of which it alerted plaintiffs to a discrepancy between its visual observations and the results of its mathematical analysis, which was based … Under these circumstances, the opinion of plaintiffs’ expert that Sear-Brown had an obligation to inform plaintiffs that if a destructive investigation were done, it could reveal the need of an alternative method of analysis
Cited 0 timesPublishedAxelrod Management Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
95 A.D.2d 691 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1983
Corp. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y., 91 AD2d 517 , affd for reasons stated in App Div Mem 58 NY2d 1108 ; Matter of L & P Realty Co. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. … Y., 91 AD2d 517 ; Matter of Fresh Meadows Assoc. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 92 Misc 2d 519 , affd 63 AD2d 943 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished244 A.D. 788 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1935
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.
80 A.D.2d 818 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 31, 1981
Plaintiff Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc., sued defendant Bankers Trust Co. for brokerage commissions. … There were motions by various parties: (a) to dismiss the Brown, Harris, Stevens complaint; (b) to dismiss certain affirmative defenses in Bankers Trust’s answer; (c) for a severance of the third-party complaint; and (d)
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.
80 A.D.2d 771 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna