Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

3.41s

  • Brown v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

    112 A.D. 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1906

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Manshul Realty Corp.

    271 A.D.2d 222 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1946

    (Landau v. Herts Drivurself Stations, Inc., 237 App. Div. 141 ; Great Northern R. Co. v. Fowler, 136 Fed. 118, 121 .) … (Farrington v. Harlem Savings Bank, 280 N. Y; 1; Dominicis v. United States Casualty Co., 132 App. Div. 553, 556 ; Landau v. Herts Drivurself Stations, Inc., 237 *224 App. Div. 141; Kirchner v. N. H. S. M. Co., 135 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steuben County Department of Social Services v. Brown

    54 A.D.2d 1138 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

    98 N.Y.S. 1098 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 7, 1906

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad

    54 N.Y.S. 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 1898

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boniello v. Niagara County Board of Elections

    131 A.D.3d 808 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 19, 2015

    Same memorandum as in Matter of Boniello v Niagara County Bd. of Elections ([appeal No. 1] 131 AD3d 806 [2015]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Sconiers, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bodanza v. Public Employment Relations Board

    119 A.D.2d 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 17, 1986

    It is well settled that "PERB’s jurisdiction encompasses only those matters specifically covered by the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law art 14]” (Matter of Zuckerman v Board of Educ., 44 NY2d 336 , 343). … Professions v Newman, 86 AD2d 734 , lv denied 56 NY2d 504 ; Matter of United Univ. Professions v Newman, 77 AD2d 709 , lv denied 51 NY2d 707 ; see generally, Chicago Teachers Union v Hudson, 475 US —, 89 L Ed 2d 232 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Caruso v. Board of Collective Bargaining

    161 A.D.2d 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 17, 1990

    Decision and order number B-64-88 of the respondent Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York which, following a hearing, determined that the topic of a February 17, 1987 directive by the Police Commissioner … (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 [1974].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosenberg v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    286 A.D. 1019 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1955

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ragsdale v. Board of Education

    256 A.D. 1056 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1939

    (See Matter of Farrar v. Board of Education, 254 App. Div. 733 .) Settle order on notice. Present — ' Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spellens v. Community School Board No. 19

    48 A.D.2d 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1975

    v Board of Educ. of City of N. … The above authorities have not been overruled, insofar as the situation at bar is concerned, by Board of Regents v Roth ( 408 US 564 ) and Perry v Sindermann ( 408 US 593 ) (Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of City of N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Woolsey

    254 A.D. 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 1938

    Act, § 440; Sautter v. Frick, 227 App. Div. 760 ; Conklin v. Currie, 235 id. 703; Gilman v. Prentice, 132 N. Y. 488 ; Ventimiglia v. Eichner, 213 id. 147.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kearns V. Board of Education

    254 A.D. 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1938

    (Wood v. City of New York, 274 N. Y. 155 ; Farrell v. City of Buffalo, 118 App. Div. 597 .) The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendant, and the petition dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bradley v. Board of Assessment Review

    198 A.D.2d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1993

    Same Memorandum as in Matter of Bradley v Board of Assessment Review ([appeal No. 1] 198 AD2d 766— [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J. — Tax Assessment.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Giava v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    188 A.D.2d 466 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1992

    , or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441 ; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 40 NY2d 309 ). … The zoning board’s determination will ordinarily be sustained if the determination has a rational basis (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, supra, at 444).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Westmount International Hotels, Inc. v. Sear-Brown Associates

    106 A.D.2d 861 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1984

    Sear-Brown had an ongoing consulting relationship with plaintiffs in the course of which it alerted plaintiffs to a discrepancy between its visual observations and the results of its mathematical analysis, which was based … Under these circumstances, the opinion of plaintiffs’ expert that Sear-Brown had an obligation to inform plaintiffs that if a destructive investigation were done, it could reveal the need of an alternative method of analysis

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Axelrod Management Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

    95 A.D.2d 691 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1983

    Corp. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y., 91 AD2d 517 , affd for reasons stated in App Div Mem 58 NY2d 1108 ; Matter of L & P Realty Co. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. … Y., 91 AD2d 517 ; Matter of Fresh Meadows Assoc. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 92 Misc 2d 519 , affd 63 AD2d 943 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hurley v. Board of Education

    244 A.D. 788 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1935

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.

    80 A.D.2d 818 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 31, 1981

    Plaintiff Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc., sued defendant Bankers Trust Co. for brokerage commissions. … There were motions by various parties: (a) to dismiss the Brown, Harris, Stevens complaint; (b) to dismiss certain affirmative defenses in Bankers Trust’s answer; (c) for a severance of the third-party complaint; and (d)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.

    80 A.D.2d 771 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.