Case law

Richetti v. New York State Board

275 A.D.2d 979 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1949

Menreal Corp v. Board of Standards

235 A.D. 850 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1932

Order confirming the determination of the board of standards and appeals reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, certiorari order sustained, determination annulled, and it is directed that the respondents grant appellant … In our opinion, the action of the board of standards and appeals in denying appellant’s petition for a variance on the ground of practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships was unreasonable and arbitrary.

Leonard v. Federal Paper Board Co.

196 A.D. 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1921

O'Brien v. Tonawanda Board & Paper Co.

196 A.D. 918 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1921

Keizerstein v. Board of Standards & Appeals

225 A.D. 805 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1929

Order confirming determination of board of standards and appeals unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ.

White v. State Board of Pharmacy

285 A.D. 1194 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1955

Reilly v. Board of Higher Education

282 A.D. 1038 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1953

Angrist v. Board of Higher Education

280 A.D. 756 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 1952

Kay v. Board of Higher Education

259 A.D. 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 1940

State Board of Pharmacy v. Rupp

115 N.Y.S. 1145 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 1909

Action by the State Board of Pharmacy against Louis P. Rupp. No opinion. Motion granted. Order signed.

Raskin v. Board of Higher Education

5 A.D.2d 765 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 1958

Marianetti v. Zoning Board of Appeals

5 A.D.2d 807 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 1958

Board of Water Commissioners v. Shutts

61 A.D. 616 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1901

Ralph v. Board of Estimate

280 A.D. 942 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 14, 1952

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review the determination of the board of estimate, City of New York, as head of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, in denying petitioner’s application … Act, § 1296, subd. 7; Matter of Burke v. Bromberger, 300 N. Y. 248 .) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Du Bois v. Board of Education

104 A.D.2d 990 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 22, 1984

Nyquist, 43 NY2d 48, 53 , supra; Matter of Cole v Board of Educ., 90 AD2d 419, 428 , affd 60 NY2d 941 ; Matter of Leggio v Oglesby, 69 AD2d 446, 449-450 , apps dsmd 48 NY2d 882 , 53 NY2d 704 ). … P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Goldin

38 A.D.2d 267 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 1972

The plaintiff in this action for a declaratory judgment, the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County (hereinafter called BOCES), is a board of education established in 1967 by the Commissioner of Education … (Brownell v. Board of Education, 239 N. Y. 369 ; Sartorious v. Cohen, 249 N. Y. 31 .) No limitation has been placed or attempted to be placed upon its use, and yet this main purpose underlies the exercise of discretion.

Halper v. Board of Zoning & Appeals

262 A.D.2d 412 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 1999

The respondent Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Roslyn Estates (hereinafter the Board) complied fully with the notice requirements of Village Law § 7-712-a (7). … Under the circumstances, the denial of the petitioners’ eleventh-hour request for an adjournment of the hearing was not an improvident exercise of discretion by the Board.

Conners v. Zoning Board of Appeals

249 A.D.2d 473 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 1998

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, dated May 22, 1996, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the intervenorrespondent … Accordingly, the petition was properly denied and the proceeding dismissed (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441 ). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Halpin v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

65 A.D.2d 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1978

Proceeding instituted in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 7, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human … This determination, which was affirmed by the respondent State Human Rights Appeal Board, must be confirmed.

BROWN, CHRISTY M. v. WOLFGRAM, RAYMOND

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 2013

BROWN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RAYMOND WOLFGRAM, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. SHIRLEY A. GORMAN, BROCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. … Brady, 216 AD2d 660, 661; Matter of Hartman v Hartman, 214 AD2d 780, 782).