Case law

Dininny v. Brown

148 A.D. 671 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1912

Brown (defendant’s testator) and his wife to the plaintiff, for an expressed consideration of $25,000. … (Delavergne v. Norris, 7 Johns. 358 ; McGuckin v. Milbank, 152 N. Y. 297 .) Purchase by the covenantee of an outstanding and superior title is sufficient to justify an action for damages. (Tucker v.

Brown v. Goord

45 A.D.3d 930 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 2007

Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, 249-250 [1986]; Matter of Doolan v Board of Coop. … Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. Dev. Corp., 84 NY2d at 493 ).

People v. Brown

251 A.D.2d 677 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1998

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the convictions is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 ; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ). … In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Brown v. Phipps

132 A.D.3d 1335 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 2015

People v. Brown

132 A.D.3d 1274 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2015

People v. Brown

160 A.D.2d 172 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1990

A handwriting expert offered his opinion that Brown had written the robbery note. The defendant presented no evidence. … (See, People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 221-222 [1989] [hand inside jacket and announcing a "stickup” reasonably led to conclusion that defendant was displaying a firearm].) *174 The defendant’s counsel argues that Brown was denied

People v. Brown

261 A.D.2d 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1999

Brown, 261 AD2d 889 [decided herewith]). … Brown, 155 AD2d 608 ; People v Colon, 89 AD2d 552 ; People v Lee, 84 AD2d 699 ).

Brown v. State

9 A.D.3d 23 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 13, 2004

Thereafter, in 2000, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of federal equal protection claims in an action brought by 33 of the 67 claimants in this action (Brown v City of Oneonta … Initially, we hold that the Second Circuit decision in Brown v City of Oneonta (supra) does not in any respect preclude claimants—on principles of collateral estoppel—from litigating their state constitutional equal protection

People v. Brown

81 A.D.3d 499 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2011

Defendant’s claim that his waiver of a jury trial was invalid because he allegedly did not sign it in open court (see CPL 320.10 [2]) is a claim requiring preservation (see People v Johnson, 51 NY2d 986 [1980]; People v Magnano … As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (see Almendarez-Torres v United States, 523 US 224 [1998]; People v Bell, 15 NY3d 935 [2010]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, McGuire, Renwick and Richter, JJ.

People v. Brown

280 A.D.2d 485 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 5, 2001

However, since the defendant did not seek to withdraw his plea or move to vacate the judgment, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 ; People *486 v Churby, 277 AD2d 393 ; People … v Pike, 276 AD2d 649 ; People v Walters, 273 AD2d 418 ; People v Gayle, 224 AD2d 710 ).

Brown v. State

284 A.D. 1014 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 24, 1954

(Goodwin v. State of New York, 274 App. Div. 824 , affd. 298 N. Y. 873 ; Taylor v. State of New York, 262 App. Div. 657 , affd. 288 N. Y. 542 ; Schill v. State of New York, 258 App. Div. 769 .) Lyra C. … Brown was driving the automobile of her husband, Mayo Brown, who was not present in the ear, and she was not operating the car for his business or benefit.

People v. Brown

140 A.D. 591 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1910

Defendants have been indicted because the accountant entered in the capital account of Brown the items “ Jan. 1, Sunds., $26,345.84.” … Hegeman v. Corrigan ( 195 N.

People v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 719 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 12, 1976

People v. Brown

134 A.D.3d 637 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2015

Butler v. Brown

180 A.D.2d 406 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 1992

Plaintiffs then instituted the instant malpractice action against defendant Brown. … Nor was it error to award prejudgment interest from September 1, 1986, the accrual of the malpractice action, pursuant to CPLR 5001 (a) (see, Spector v Mermelstein, 485 F2d 474 [2d Cir]; Quintel Corp. v Citibank, 606 F Supp

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 2015

People v. Brown

233 A.D.2d 764 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 27, 1996

; People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234, 239 ; People v Rosado, 199 AD2d 833, 834-835 , lv denied 83 NY2d 876 ). … representation” (People v English, 215 AD2d 871, 873 , lv denied 86 NY2d 793 ; see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 ).

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 2015

This evidence was relevant to the contested issue of intent (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]), and it tended to complete the narrative, explaining the events leading up to defendant’s arrest (see People v Morris … Moreover, the court expressly stated that, as fact-finder in this nonjury trial, it would not draw any inference of propensity, and the court is deemed capable of keeping that promise (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403 [1987

Brown v. Spohr

87 A.D. 522 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1903

(Martin v. Funk, 15 N. Y. 134 ; Matson v. Abbey, 70 Hun, 475 ; Greene v. Greene, 125 N. Y. 506 ; Young v. Young, 80 id. 422; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 161 id. 554.) … Brown (or before his decease should we in our discretion see fit so to do) to demand payment of said note or notes.”

People v. Brown

90 A.D.3d 545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 2011

As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (see United States v Cronic, 466 US 648 [1984]; Matter of Jeffrey V., 82 NY2d 121, 126 [1993]). … Brown, 17 NY3d 742, 743-744 [2011]).