Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • Brown v. State of New York

    2018 NY Slip Op 5816 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 2018

    Brown v State of New York ( 2018 NY Slip Op 05816 ) Brown v State of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 05816 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … DUFFY, JJ. 2016-09033 [*1]Harry Brown, appellant, v State of New York, respondent. (Claim No. 125626) TJ Morrow, New York, NY, for appellant. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, New York, NY (Steven C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carlton v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    111 A.D.2d 169 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 6, 1985

    Matters apparent on the face of the record may be examined for the first time on appeal (see, Brown v Heacock, 9 How Prac 345). … Accordingly, the board’s determination was properly sustained by Special Term (see, Matter of National Merritt v Weist, 41 NY2d 438 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Board of Pharmacy v. Rhinehardt

    116 A.D. 495 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1906

    Repr. 396) and Binder v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. ( 68 App. … There is force in this suggestion, and it is evident from the prevailing opinion in Schlesinger v. Borough Bank ( 112 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning Board

    165 A.D.2d 578 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 25, 1991

    Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d 674, 679 ; see, ECL 8-0103 [8]). … Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 154 AD2d 819, 820-821 , lv denied 75 NY2d 708 ; see also, e.g., Matter of Dodson v Planning Bd., 163 AD2d 804, 807 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    104 A.D.3d 1218 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nu-Life Construction Corp. v. Board of Review of the Board of Education

    161 A.D.2d 765 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 1990

    Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Review of the Board of Education of the City of New York dated July 20, 1987, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner in default … Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ; CPLR 7803 [4]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Owen v. Town Board of Wallkill

    94 A.D.2d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 23, 1983

    O’Connor v G&R Packing Co., 53 NY2d 278 ; Parkoffv General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 53 NY2d 412). … However, bills of particulars, while not required, are available under the Civil Service Law (see Matter of Fitzgerald v Libous, 44 NY2d 660 ; Matter of Pachucki v Walters, 56 AD2d 677 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Buffalo

    100 A.D.3d 1439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2012

    Brown (claimant) allegedly suffered personal injuries when she drove off the roadway up an embankment at the dead end of Titus Avenue in respondent, City of Buffalo. … Innes v County of *1441 Genesee, 99 AD2d 642, 643 [1984], affd 62 NY2d 779 [1984]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fischer v. NYS Board of Elections

    98 A.D.3d 1067 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 24, 2012

    of Elections, of the Suffolk County Board of Elections, Anita S. … Rogers, and of the Nassau County Board of Elections, William T. Biamonte, and Louis G. Savinetti, to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, and dismissed the petition.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    104 A.D.3d 1218 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smoke v. Planning Board

    138 A.D.3d 1437 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2016

    on the special permit (Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]). … Waste Servs. v Board of Appeals of Town of Porter ( 75 AD2d 106 [1980], affd 52 NY2d 963 [1981]) does not dictate a different result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tsunis v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    59 A.D.3d 726 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 2009

    (Matter of Gallo v Rosell, 52 AD3d 514, 515 [2008]; see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]). … of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d at 613; see Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374, 384 [1995]; Matter of Rivero v Voelker, 38 AD3d 784, 785 [2007]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Joseph v. Planning Board of Yorktown

    140 A.D.2d 670 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 1988

    in lieu of the reservation of land suitable for recreational purposes (see, Town Law § 277), the planning board exercised that authority in an arbitrary and capricious manner. … Corp. v Anderson, 98 AD2d 367, 373 , affd 62 NY2d 965 ), and the judgment annulling that condition is hereby affirmed. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Planning Board

    136 A.D.3d 868 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 2016

    Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 102 [1984]). … Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d 219, 228-230 [2007]; Boyles v Town Bd. of Town of Bethlehem, 278 AD2d 688, 691 [2000]; Greenwich Citizens Comm. v Counties of Warren & Washington Indus

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Planning Board

    136 A.D.3d 868 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 2016

    Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 102 [1984]). … Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d 219, 228-230 [2007]; Boyles v Town Bd. of Town of Bethlehem, 278 AD2d 688, 691 [2000]; Greenwich Citizens Comm. v Counties of Warren & Washington Indus

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Niceforo v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    147 A.D.2d 483 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 1989

    an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441 ; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 40 NY2d 309 ). … The zoning board’s determination will ordinarily be sustained if the determination has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, supra, at 444).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Glickenhaus Foundation v. Board of Assessors

    40 A.D.2d 1059 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1972

    Co. v. State Tax Comm., 246 N. Y. 322 ). … Y. v. City of Amsterdam, 31 Misc 2d 1096, 1098 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Groat v. Town Board of Glenville

    63 A.D.2d 1043 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1978

    He was dismissed from the force by the board. … A failure to state findings precludes adequate judicial review (Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, 38 NY2d 391 ; Matter of Pachucki v Walters, 56 AD2d 677 ). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shokrian v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    32 A.D.3d 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 19, 2006

    , or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d 304, 308 [2002]; Matter of Doyle v Amster, 79 NY2d 592, 596 [1992]). … A zoning board’s *962 determination will be upheld if it has a rational basis (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, supra; Matter of DiPaci v Zoning Bd. of Appeals Vil. of Upper Nyack, 4 AD3d 354 [2004]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crepeau v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    195 A.D.2d 919 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 29, 1993

    A balanced reading of Matter of McCartney and a review of the case law relied upon by that Court (see, Matter of De Beilis v Luney, 128 AD2d 778 ; Matter of Stanley v Board of Appeals, 168 Misc 797 ) instead reveals a rule … Board of Appeals, supra; Matter of Pickett v Town of Tusten Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 169 AD2d 906, 907 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.