Case law

People ex rel. Jeffress v. Brown

252 A.D. 891 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 29, 1937

Bailey v. McCann, 222 App. Div. 465 .) Whether the ordinance in question was confiscatory and, therefore, unconstitutional depended upon the facts to be developed upon the trial. (Penna. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U. … (People v. West, 106 N. Y. 293 .) Whether this particular ordinance is confiscatory and, therefore, unconstitutional is a mixed question of law and fact. This question cannot be determined in this proceeding.

I. Edward Brown, Inc. v. Astor Supply Co.

4 A.D.2d 177 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 25, 1957

Co. v. Stenacher, 236 N. Y. 312 ; Kaumagraph Co. v. Stampagraph Co., 197 App. Div. 66 , affd. 235 N. Y. 1 ). … Y. 76 ; Peekskill Coal & Fuel Co. v. Martin, 279 App. Div. 669 ; Monroe Coverall Service v. Bosner, 283 App. Div. 451 ).

Rhall v. Board of Education

40 A.D. 412 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1899

(Maxmilian v. Mayor, 62 N. Y. 165 ; Donovan v. Board of Education, 85 id. 117; Hughes v. County of Monroe, 147 id. 49; Hill v. City of Boston, 122 Mass. 344 ; Reynolds v. Board of Education, 33 App. Div. 88 .) … The case of Reynolds v. Board of Education ( 33 App. Div. 88 ) is directly in point and fenders a further discussion of the' question here jireseüted unnecessary.

Jensen v. Zoning Board of Appeals

130 A.D.2d 549 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1987

Co., 62 NY2d 494; cf., Matter of Venes v Community School Bd. of Dist. 26, 43 NY2d 520 ). … Gravel Co. v Town of Ogden, 55 NY2d 790 , revg 81 AD2d 1019 ; Matter of Blanco v Blum, 67 AD2d 947, 948 ).

Bechtle v. Board of Supervisors

81 A.D.2d 571 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1981

Spaulding v. American Wood Board Co.

5 A.D. 620 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1896

(Vale v. Brooklyn Cross-Town R. R. Co., 12 Civ. Proc. Rep. 103; Taylor v. Smith, 11 N. Y. Supp. 39 .) We think the order was right and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Sweeney v. Board of Education

112 A.D.2d 240 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 8, 1985

Board of Coop. … Matter of Alper v Gaffney, 73 AD2d 644 ; McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 9122 [4] [b] [New York State Defense Emergency Act § 22; L 1951, ch 784, § 22 as amended]). Brown, J.

Brown v. Steamship Terminal Operating Corp.

242 A.D. 784 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1934

(Hart v. Hudson River Bridge Company, 80 N. Y. 622 ; Swistak v. Erie Railroad, Co., 208 App. Div. 553 ; affd., 239 N. Y. 549 ; Warner v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 209 App. Div. 211 .) … (Nalli v. Peters, 241 N. Y. 177 ; Orlando v. Pioneer B. T. Supply Co., 239 id. 342.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Claim of Brown v. Boon & Sullivan

246 A.D. 877 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1936

Award affirmed, with one bill of costs to be divided equally between the claimant and the State Industrial Board, and printing disbursements to each. Hill, P. … J., McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on the authority of Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer ( 262 N. Y. 534 ).

Piazza Bros. v. Board of Education

29 A.D.3d 701 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 9, 2006

Corp. v New York City School Constr. Auth., 5 NY3d 189, 192 [2005]; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 547 [1983]; H. … . & Assoc. v Board of Educ., Hempstead Union Free School Dist. No. 1, 207 AD2d 773, 775 [1994]).

Joseph v. Board of Trustees

138 A.D.2d 378 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 7, 1988

of examiners of the board of education” (emphasis added). … The TRS characterized the interim acting positions, which were created in response to temporary vacancies which occurred subsequent to a Federally ordered revamping of the Board’s hiring procedures (see, Chance v Board of

Bishop v. Board of Trustees

81 A.D.2d 1009 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1981

Upon review of this form the board decided that the construction and operation of the garage would not significantly affect the environment. … Although we recognize that a very low threshold of significance will trigger the need for the preparation of an environmental impact statement (H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev.

Community Board No. 3 v. State

76 A.D.2d 851 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1980

We note from the correspondence between petitioner, Community Board No. 3, and appellant OMRDD that the site at 33-32 89th Street, Jackson Heights, New York, was selected for use as a residential community facility for the … No. 2 v New York State Teachers *853 Retirement System, 46 Misc 2d 225 , affd 27 AD2d 265 .)

Cimafonte v. Levittown Board of Education

299 A.D.2d 445 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 2002

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants (see Lawes v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 16 NY2d 302, 306 ; Janukajtis v Fallon, 284 AD2d 428 ; Convey v City of Rye School

Brown v. Lutheran Medical Center

107 A.D.3d 837 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 2013

In March 2007, the plaintiffs wife, Sharline Brown, allegedly sustained injuries as a result of the defendants’ medical malpractice. … Hosp., 51 NY2d 242, 249 [1980]; George v Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 NY2d 170, 174-175 [1979]; Egan v Neghavi, 84 AD3d 1014, 1014 [2011]).

Stockfield v. Town Board of Somers

87 A.D.2d 633 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 22, 1982

The action of the town board sought to be reviewed by petitioners was essentially legislative in nature (see Matter of Amerada Hess Corp. v Lefkowitz, 82 AD2d 882, and the cases cited therein, mot for lv to app den by this … The appropriate vehicle for review, in such case, is an action for a declaratory judgment and not a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see Matter of Amerada Hess Corp. v Lefkowitz, supra).

Restaino v. Yonkers Board of Education

13 A.D.3d 432 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 2004

City of New York, 8 AD3d 256 [2004]; Furgang v Club Med, 299 AD2d 162 [2002]; Goldberg v Town of Hempstead, 289 AD2d 198 [2001]; Schiavone v Brinewood Rod & Gun Club, 283 AD2d 234 [2001]; Calise v City of New York, 239 AD2d … 378 [1997]; Kensy v Village of Southampton, 206 AD2d 506 [1994]).

People ex rel. Brown v. Martin

264 A.D. 746 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1942

Jobissy v. Murphy, 244 App. Div. 834 ; affd., 268 N. Y. 695 .) The order appealed from should be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —1 Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Brown v. Long Beach Lumber Co.

228 A.D. 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1930

Co. v. Hammerstein Opera Co., 184 App. Div. 440 ) Present — Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Finigan v. Board of Education

153 A.D. 429 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1912

Plaintiff demurs to said separate defense on the ground that “ it is insufficient in law upon the face thereof,” and her counsel cites Steinson v. Board of Education ( 49 App. Div. 143 ; affd., 165 N. … Steinson v. Board of Education, 158 N.