Case law

People v. Brown

77 A.D.3d 1186 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 2010

Johnston, 273 AD2d 514, 515 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 935 [2000]; People v Hofmann, 238 AD2d 716, 719 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 940 [1997]). … [2009]; People v Bombard, 270 AD2d 648, 648-649 [2000]).

Wood v. Brown

26 A.D.3d 390 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 2006

the hearing, and his consent to the order of protection, all clearly precluded his subsequent claim that he had not been served with notice of the mother’s petition (see Family Ct Act § 167; see also Matter of Borggreen v … Borggreen, 13 AD3d 756, 757 [2004]; Matter of Fallon v Fallon, 4 AD3d 426, 427 [2004]; Matter of Brozzo v Brozzo, 192 AD2d 878, 879-880 [1993]).

Brown v. Goord

290 A.D.2d 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2002

administrative reversal and expungement, petitioner has in fact received all of the relief to which he could have been entitled and, therefore, dismissal of this appeal as moot is appropriate (see, e.g., Matter of Sutton v

Brown v. Cunningham

17 A.D.3d 886 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 2005

, 1011 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 509 [2003], cert denied 540 US 1166 [2004]; Matter of Borcsok v Selsky, 296 AD2d 678, 678 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 616 [2002]). … Goord, 7 AD3d 847, 848 [2004]; Matter of Perkins v Goord, 290 AD2d 700, 701 [2002]).

People v. Brown

232 A.D.2d 750 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 1996

Moses, 162 AD2d 311, 312 ; People v Suarez, 162 AD2d 302 , lv denied 76 NY2d 944 ). … No objection having been raised at trial to the use of this procedure, this issue too is unpreserved for review (see, People v Johnson, supra, at 793; People v Valenti, 199 AD2d 617, 618 , lv denied 83 NY2d 811 ).

People v. Brown

136 A.D.3d 528 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2016

People v. Brown

268 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2000

The testimony adduced at the hearing supports the court’s determination by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the acts with which he was charged (see, CPL 410.70 [3]; People v Yutesler, 177 AD2d … Singletary v Dalsheim, 84 AD2d 553 ). In addition, the defendant’s resentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).

People v. Brown

134 A.D.3d 657 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2015

Brown v. Andreoli

81 A.D.3d 498 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2011

Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for failing to move for a default judgment until more than one year after defendant’s time to answer had expired (see CPLR 3215 [c]; Mejia-Ortiz v Inoa, 71 AD3d 517 [2010 … The motion court, after determining that no reasonable excuse had been established, should have dismissed the complaint as abandoned (see CPLR 3215 [c]; Perricone v City of New York, 62 NY2d 661, 663 [1984]; Opia v Chukwu

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 854 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2015

210 AD2d 431, 434 [1994]; see People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, 356 [1990], affd 500 US 352 [1991]; People v Shaheed, 70 AD3d 980 [2010]; People v Bowman, 58 AD3d 747 [2009]; People v Wilson, 278 AD2d 519 [2000]). … Lockley, 84 AD3d at 837 ; see People v Silva, 24 NY3d 294, 299-300 [2014]; People v Kisoon, 8 NY3d at 134-135 ; People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d at 279 - *858 280; People v Surpris, 83 AD3d at 744 ).

People v. Brown

50 A.D.3d 1596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 25, 2008

People v Johnson, 238 AD2d 267 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 894 [1997]; People v Lopez, 213 AD2d 255 [1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 976 [1995]; People v Rosario, 193 AD2d 445 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 708 [1993]). … Herring, 83 NY2d 780, 782-783 [1994]; Ortiz, 76 NY2d at 449-450 ; see also People v Torrence, 305 AD2d 1042 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 625 [2003]).

People v. Brown

256 A.D.2d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1998

Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 ; People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602 ; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210 ; People v Ortiz, 229 AD2d 451 ). … States, 393 US 410 ; People v DiFalco, 80 NY2d 693 ; People v Johnson, 66 NY2d 398, 402 ; People v Bigelow, supra; People v Beruvais, 231 AD2d 733 ; People v Jean-Charles, 226 AD2d 395 ; People v Cruz, 191 AD2d 507 ).

People v. Brown

2018 NY Slip Op 1173 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 20, 2018

People v Brown ( 2018 NY Slip Op 01173 ) People v Brown 2018 NY Slip Op 01173 Decided on February 20, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Richter, J.P., J. … Kern, JJ. 971/14 4634 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Defendant appeals from the judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert A.

Brown v. Appelman

241 A.D.2d 279 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1998

; Matter of Pirro v LaCava, supra; People v Shulman, 172 Misc 2d 535 ; People v Williamson, 172 Misc 2d 172 ; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 ; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 ; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 ). … , 172 Misc 2d 172 , supra; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 , supra; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 , supra; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 , supra).

People v. Brown

176 A.D.2d 408 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 19, 1991

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 *409 NY2d 620, 621 ; People v Dunavin, 173 AD2d 1032 ), we find that it was legally sufficient. … It is presumed that the jury credited this testimony over the conflicting testimony from defendant’s witnesses (see, People v Hagmann, 175 AD2d 502 ).

Brown v. Condzal

137 A.D.3d 667 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2016

McMann v. Brown

92 A.D. 249 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1904

The motion was made September 18, 1903, The facts upon which defendant claimed that he' was entitled to have the complaint dismissed are similar to those stated in Fisher Malting Co. v. Brown ( 92 App. … Brown (supra) the motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted.

People v. Brown

138 A.D.3d 504 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 12, 2016

Brown v. Rosario

272 A.D.2d 205 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 18, 2000

perceive no basis to disturb the challenged custody determination, particularly since the determination, premised largely on the hearing court’s credibility findings, is entitled to our deference (see, Matter of Clara L. v

Brown v. Maouad

137 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 2016