Case law

Brown v. Goord

24 A.D.3d 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 2005

NY2d 964, 966 [1990]; Matter of Barnes v Goord, 279 AD2d 685 [2001]). … Nevertheless, petitioner’s retaliation defense presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Carrington v Goord, 20 AD3d 835 [2005]; Matter of Becker v Goord, 13 AD3d 947, 948 [2004]).

Shoulders v. Brown

224 A.D.2d 960 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1996

and driven by defendant Eddie Lee *961 Brown. … Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 ).

Brown v. Blumenfeld

89 A.D.3d 94 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 2011

Brown, the District Attorney of Queens County (hereinafter the District Attorney), who interviewed Perez pursuant to the District Attorney’s Queens Central Booking Interview Program (hereinafter the Program) violated ethical … People v Joseph R., 17 NY3d 767 [2011]; People v Concepcion, 17 NY3d 192 [2011]).

Stokes v. Brown

2 A.D.3d 1373 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 2003

Defendant failed to demonstrate that Gail suffered only “a mild, minor or slight limitation of use” (King v Johnston, 211 AD2d 907, 907 [1995], citing Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 957 [1992]; see Anderson v Persell, 272 AD2d … Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Gray v Lasurdo, 302 AD2d 560 [2003]).

Brown v. Weir

95 A.D. 78 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1904

On the 20th day of' October, 1902, she consigned to herself at Brown’s Point, Astoria,, through the defendant, a trunk containing her theatrical wardrobe. … (Hamilton v. McPherson, supra, 76 , and authorities there cited; Allen v. McConihe, 124 N. Y. 342, 347 , and authorities there cited; Rochester Lantern Co. v. S. & P. P.

People v. Brown

84 A.D.3d 1262 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2011

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to *1263 apply for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 (see People v Johnson, 83 AD3d 734 [2d Dept … 2011]; People v Phillips, 82 AD3d 1011 [2011], lv granted 16 NY3d 834 [2011]).

People v. Brown

169 A.D.2d 773 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 1991

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 ). Bracken, J.

Dufour v. Brown

66 A.D.3d 1217 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 22, 2009

v Howes, 259 AD2d 895, 896 [1999]; Belyski v Pedone, 240 AD2d 608, 609 [1997]; Duval v Barnaby, 75 App Div 154, 156 [1902]). … Zwinge v Love, 37 AD2d 874 [1971]).

People v. Brown

114 A.D.2d 1036 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 25, 1985

636 ; People v Warren, 47 NY2d 740 ). … v Alford, supra, at p 31).

People v. Brown

161 A.D.2d 458 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 22, 1990

(See, People v Adams, 69 NY2d 805, 806 [1987].) … [1983]; People v Rahman, 62 AD2d 968 [1st Dept 1978], affd 46 NY2d 882 [1979]).

Brown v. Goord

19 A.D.3d 773 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 2005

Petitioner is currently incarcerated following his conviction of various crimes, including the assault of a woman (People v Brown, 287 AD2d 341 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 702 [2002]). … Given the “unique facts of this case” (Matter of Brown v New York City Police Dept., supra at 561), the reliance on the presentence report as a basis for refusing to expunge the misinformation in petitioner’s guidance file

Scheker v. Brown

91 A.D.3d 751 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2012

Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). … 813 [1991]; Lively v Fernandez, 85 AD3d 981 [2011]; Pierson v Edwards, 77 AD3d 642 [2010]; Vasquez v John Doe #1, 73 AD3d 1033 [2010]).

People v. Brown

115 A.D.2d 485 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 1985

The officers did not testify that complainant had identified defendant and thus there was no violation of the rule formulated in People v Trowbridge ( 305 NY 471 ; see also, People v Caserta, 19 NY2d 18 ). … People v Ross, 79 AD2d 666 ).

People v. Brown

77 A.D.3d 1186 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 2010

Johnston, 273 AD2d 514, 515 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 935 [2000]; People v Hofmann, 238 AD2d 716, 719 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 940 [1997]). … [2009]; People v Bombard, 270 AD2d 648, 648-649 [2000]).

Wood v. Brown

26 A.D.3d 390 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 2006

the hearing, and his consent to the order of protection, all clearly precluded his subsequent claim that he had not been served with notice of the mother’s petition (see Family Ct Act § 167; see also Matter of Borggreen v … Borggreen, 13 AD3d 756, 757 [2004]; Matter of Fallon v Fallon, 4 AD3d 426, 427 [2004]; Matter of Brozzo v Brozzo, 192 AD2d 878, 879-880 [1993]).

People v. Brown

113 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 9, 1985

Accordingly, the People had the burden to show that at least 56 days were excludable pursuant to CPL 30.30 (4) (People v Berkowitz, 50 NY2d 333, 349 ). … Under such circumstances the People are not charged with delay not solely attributable to the People’s unreadiness (People v Allen, supra).

Brown v. Appelman

241 A.D.2d 279 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1998

; Matter of Pirro v LaCava, supra; People v Shulman, 172 Misc 2d 535 ; People v Williamson, 172 Misc 2d 172 ; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 ; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 ; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 ). … , 172 Misc 2d 172 , supra; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 , supra; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 , supra; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 , supra).

People v. Brown

124 A.D.2d 667 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1986

v Gross, 111 AD2d 873 ). … In any event, a second identification procedure is not mandated by either Federal or State law (see, e.g., United States v Brown, 699 F2d 585; People v Cicero, 119 AD2d 687 ).

People v. Brown

176 A.D.2d 408 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 19, 1991

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 *409 NY2d 620, 621 ; People v Dunavin, 173 AD2d 1032 ), we find that it was legally sufficient. … It is presumed that the jury credited this testimony over the conflicting testimony from defendant’s witnesses (see, People v Hagmann, 175 AD2d 502 ).

People v. Brown

268 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2000

The testimony adduced at the hearing supports the court’s determination by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the acts with which he was charged (see, CPL 410.70 [3]; People v Yutesler, 177 AD2d … Singletary v Dalsheim, 84 AD2d 553 ). In addition, the defendant’s resentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).