Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.21s
41 A.D.2d 966 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 1973
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to compel recission of appellant Board of Education’s resolution abolishing the position of Attendance Teacher and to restore petitioner to that position, the appeal is from … There has been no attempt to create new positions or to create part time positions as was the case in Matter of Baron V. Maekreth (30 A D 2d 810, affd. 26 N Y 2d 1039).
Cited 0 timesPublished41 A.D.2d 916 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1973
Cited 0 timesPublishedRaimundi v. Board of Elections
41 A.D.2d 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1973
and directed said Board of Elections to make available at said community school board elections all the registers of persons registered to vote in general elections (commonly known as “buff cards”). … We discern no valid basis for distinguishing between elections for board of education members and community school board members with regard to the .use of computer “print-out” lists and, in the absence of any provision mandating
Cited 0 timesPublished30 A.D.2d 998 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 1968
Cited 0 timesPublished29 A.D.2d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 1968
The order of this court entered upon petitioner’s prior appeal herein (Matter of Gassner v. Board of Examiners of City of N. … However, it was error for the Special Term, in denying petitioner’s motion, to dismiss the petition herein, relief for which respondent had not cross moved (CPLR 2215; Lowenkron v. Berkeley Coop.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLasky v. Town Board of Amherst
57 A.D.3d 1392 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 2008
By Local Law No. 1-2007, defendant further amended the Town’s Zoning Code by eliminating the Planning Board’s discretion to approve a longer street in that type of subdivision. … “[T]he rights of the parties cannot be affected by the determination of [appeal No. 1] and it is therefore moot” (Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]).
Cited 4 timesPublished22 A.D.2d 243 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 1964
The supposedly padded bill was not one of the “ required reports” contemplated by the specification or by the Workmen’s Compensation Law; nor was it “ filed * * * with the Workmen’s Compensation Board ”, as charged, nor was … Although the New York County Medical Society, upon its investigation, had apparently accepted the explanation that petitioner’s “ office manager had mixed the charts of two patients by the same name ’ ’, the respondent board
Cited 0 timesPublishedTaylor v. Teachers' Retirement Board
227 A.D. 75 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 1929
On March fifth of that year she had been retired for disability, and the report of the medical board stated that she “ would probably die in the near future.” … There was no action taken on this claim until June 26, 1928, when the teachers’ retirement board refused to pay it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChiralli v. Board of Education
255 A.D. 755 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedMason v. Teachers Retirement Board
232 A.D. 854 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1931
Cited 0 timesPublished219 A.D. 861 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1927
Cited 0 timesPublishedFeuerman v. Board of Education
238 A.D. 805 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1933
There was no defect in any of the school property, and the location of the lines of the court with respect to the door in question was not a matter for which the board of education can be legally charged, but rested upon … the act of those who laid out the lines, whether subordinates of the board of education, for whose negligence the board would not be liable, or that of other persons over whom the board of education, as such, had no control
Cited 0 timesPublishedSchwartz v. Board of Education
209 A.D. 875 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1924
Cited 0 timesPublished246 A.D. 817 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1936
Cited 0 timesPublishedThompson v. Board of Elections
258 A.D. 710 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1939
Cited 0 timesPublished251 A.D. 798 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1937
Cited 0 timesPublished253 A.D. 736 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 10, 1937
Cited 0 timesPublished253 A.D. 907 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCartney v. Board of Supervisors
244 A.D. 891 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1935
Cited 0 timesPublished215 A.D. 789 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna