Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.69s
19 A.D.2d 741 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 8, 1963
An a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act by a school secretary in the New York City public school system to annul the resolution of the Board of Education of the City of New York requesting the medical board … However, petitioner does not have the right to examine, or be furnished with copies of, all reports and findings relating to her (Matter of Kropf v. Board of Educ., 18 A D 2d 919).
Cited 0 timesPublished269 A.D. 666 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 5, 1945
Cited 0 timesPublishedMontanile v. Board of Education
278 A.D. 791 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 30, 1951
Cited 0 timesPublished281 A.D. 860 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 3, 1953
Cited 0 timesPublished261 A.D. 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 3, 1941
Cited 0 timesPublished261 A.D. 954 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 1941
Cited 0 timesPublished103 N.Y.S. 1139 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 1, 1907
Cited 0 timesPublishedO'Rourke v. Board of Education
101 N.Y.S. 1136 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublished272 A.D.2d 1095 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 21, 1947
Cited 0 timesPublishedBreithut v. Teachers' Retirement Board
271 A.D.2d 822 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 22, 1946
Cited 0 timesPublishedGardiner v. Board of Education
276 A.D.2d 977 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 20, 1950
Cited 0 timesPublishedBreithut v. Teachers' Retirement Board
269 A.D. 829 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1945
Cited 0 timesPublished269 A.D. 777 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1945
Cited 0 timesPublished280 A.D. 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1951
Cited 0 timesPublishedRichards v. Board of Education
83 A.D.2d 191 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1981
This appeal involves the resubmission by a school board of defeated budget propositions to the voters. … 19, 1980 and the completion of the 1980-1981 school year, we will consider the merits of this appeal since the issue presented is significant, likely to be repeated and typically evades review (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v
Cited 1 timesPublishedTown Board of Cortlandt v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
282 A.D.2d 467 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 2, 2001
the Lakeland School District is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ; Matter of Town of Cortlandt v New York State Bd. of Real Prop. … Servs., 273 AD2d 317 ; Matter of Glinka v Town of Poughkeepsie, 209 AD2d 773 ; Matter of Romano v Town Bd., 200 AD2d 934 ). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPier v. Board of Assessment Review
209 A.D.2d 788 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1994
only requirement for obtaining an order permitting intervention via this section is the existence of a common question of law or fact, the resolution of such a motion is nevertheless a matter of discretion (see, Kaczmarek v … Board of Assessment Review ( 91 AD2d 1037 , affd on mem below 61 NY2d 695 ).
Cited 20 timesPublishedSterngass v. Town Board of Clarkstown
43 A.D.3d 1037 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2007
made during the course of a litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial determination (see Marcus Dairy, Inc. v … issue, they are precluded from relitigating it. *1038 Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellants’ motion which was for leave to amend the complaints in action Nos. 1 and 2 (see Norwalk v
Cited 8 timesPublished127 A.D.2d 966 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 1987
Memorandum: Respondent Board of Education appeals from an order that annulled its determination to transfer the adminis *967 tration of the School District’s special education program to the Steuben-Allegany Board of Cooperative … After the order was granted, the Board held a public hearing on June 30, 1986 and again voted to transfer administration of the program to BOCES.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSullivan v. Town Board of Riverhead
102 A.D.2d 113 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1984
of Tandem Holding Corp. v Board of Zoning Appeals, supra, p 802). … of Lee Realty Co. v Village of Spring Val., supra; Matter of Tandem Holding Corp. v Board of Zoning Appeals, supra; Matter of Pleasant Val.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna