Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.37s
24 A.D.2d 1054 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1965
This article 78 proceeding seeks a review of the determination of the Board of Regents suspending for a two-month period the petitioner’s right to practice medicine. … The action by the Board of Regents was justified. The discipline imposed was not disproportionate to the offense for which lie was found guilty. (Sec Matter of Palermo v. Board of Regents, 14 A D 2d 953.)
Cited 0 timesPublished23 A.D.2d 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1965
A question of importance, so it seems to me, is whether the board bad notice of any prior injury as the result of the students’ snowballing activity. … issue of liability is a close one and there is other error with respect to the exclusion of the documentary evidence of the injury to the other child, a new trial should be granted in the interests of justice (Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 A.D.2d 514 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 7, 1965
Cited 0 timesPublishedSullivan v. Board of Education
181 A.D. 477 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1918
The board of education in fixing salaries must consider “ merit, grade of class taught, length of service, experience in teaching,” and by such things, “or by such a combination of these considerations as said board may deem … Hence, I think that the statute did not constrain the board to group all regular teachers under one head with one uniform salary and increases. But the minimum must always be observed, and there the board failed.
Cited 0 timesPublished215 A.D. 709 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublished196 A.D. 892 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1921
Cited 0 timesPublished42 N.Y.S. 417 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1896
Justice BROWN to deny that the state may manifest its gratitude for actual military or other public service by the imposition of taxes for the benefit of those who have rendered such service, or of persons dependent upon
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarpenter v. Board of Education
10 A.D.2d 827 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 12, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteinson v. Board of Education
71 N.Y.S. 1149 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 1901
Action by George Steinson against the board of education of the city of New York. T. Farley, for appellant. J. E. Eustis, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Cited 0 timesPublished273 A.D. 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 9, 1948
Cited 0 timesPublishedLindenfeld v. Board of Regents
273 A.D. 1040 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1948
(United States v. Lindenfeld, 142 P. 2d 829 , certiorari denied 323 U. S. 761 .) The petitioner then served his sentence. On July 20, 1943, the Regents revoked the petitioner’s license without a hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublished268 A.D. 934 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1944
Cited 0 timesPublishedLindenfeld v. Board of Regents
274 A.D. 831 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 7, 1948
Cited 0 timesPublished130 N.Y.S. 1122 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 1911
Cited 0 timesPublished138 N.Y.S. 1138 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 6, 1912
Cited 0 timesPublished135 N.Y.S. 1109 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1912
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCarton v. Board of Education
140 N.Y.S. 1129 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 28, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedDouglas v. Board of Supervisors
68 A.D. 296 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1902
In the year 1899 the assessors reassessed said lands for the taxes of 1898, but on the appellant’s complaint such reassessment *297 was stricken from the roll by the board of assessors of the town. … The following year a reassessment of the tax was directed by the respondent, the board of supervisors of the county, and the tax having been paid by the appellant under protest, he thereafter moved in the County Court for
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteinson v. Board of Education
71 A.D. 618 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1902
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlebrande v. Board of Education
268 A.D. 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 13, 1944
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna