Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • Winn v. Brown

    226 A.D.2d 191 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 11, 1996

    occurred during a time of much stress for this 15-year tenant, when local drug dealers were making her fear for the life of her son and herself and her request for a transfer remained unfulfilled (cf., Matter of Milton v

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    47 A.D.3d 826 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 2008

    Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]; People v Snyder, 304 AD2d 776, 777 [2003]; People v Pinckney, 220 AD2d 539 [1995]). … Further, the age disparities between the defendant and the fillers were not so apparent as to single out the defendant (see People v Pinckney, 220 AD2d at 539 ; People v Gonzalez, 173 AD2d 48, 56-57 [1991]; People v Middleton

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    193 A.D. 203 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1920

    .: The defendant Brown and some seventeen other persons were indicted for the crime of riot as defined by section 2090 of the Penal Law. … (People v. Jordan, 125 App. Div. 522 ; People v. Ennis, 176 N. Y. 289 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Feehan

    125 A.D.3d 1499 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2015

    Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. … of the legal issues involved in the determination of a[n] . . . application, are exempt from the provisions of the Open Meetings Law” (2 NY Jur 2d, Administrative Law § 103; see Matter of Young v Board of Appeals of Inc.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2026 NY Slip Op 01628 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2026

    People v Brown ( 2026 NY Slip Op 01628 ) People v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 01628 Decided on March 20, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … ANDRELLO BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clemens v. Brown

    69 A.D.3d 1197 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 21, 2010

    Brown and defendant Celeste Othmer Brown (hereinafter the owners) hired defendant David LeClair (hereinafter defendant) to perform work on a pole barn that was being constructed on their property in the Town of Ballston Spa … [Ross], 56 NY2d 895, 897 [1982]; Roberts v El-Hajal, 23 AD3d 733, 733 [2005]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    177 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 26, 1991

    (See, People v Lowrance, 41 NY2d 303 .) Defendant’s motion to controvert the warrant was properly denied. The informant’s information was plainly based on personal knowledge (People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549 ). … Moreover, police surveillance provided meaningful confirmation of some of the details (People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231, 237 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Middleton

    244 A.D.2d 306 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1997

    Brown then jumped onto the running *308 board of the truck, and jammed the metal pipe between the steering wheel and the dashboard to prevent Middleton from moving the vehicle any further. … With Brown still standing on the running board, Middleton put the truck in forward gear and drove approximately 150 feet until he crashed into a building, pinning Brown between the truck and a wall.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2019 NY Slip Op 8746 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 2019

    People v Brown ( 2019 NY Slip Op 08746 ) People v Brown 2019 NY Slip Op 08746 Decided on December 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … The conviction was affirmed upon appeal ( People v Brown , 232 AD3d 750 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 940 [1997]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hazelton v. Brown

    248 A.D.2d 871 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1998

    Brown (hereinafter defendant) failed to stop or yield the right-of-way prior to entering an intersection. … Since “an operator who has the right of way is entitled to anticipate that other vehicles will obey the traffic laws that require them to yield” (Namisnak v Martin, 244 AD2d 258, 260 ; see, Anastasio v Scheer, 239 AD2d 823

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    192 A.D.3d 1603 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2021

    People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 01668 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 01668 Decided on March 19, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … LUTHER BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    64 A.D. 544 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1901

    Thus, in Cook v. … (Finch v. Carpenter, 29 Hun, 268 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    52 A.D.3d 1237 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 6, 2008

    ]; People v Vincent, 231 AD2d 444, 445 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 931 [1996]; People v Pagan, 163 AD2d 681, 681-682 [1990]). … Also contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stitzel v. Brown

    1 A.D.2d 826 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 26, 2003

    of visitation [to a noncustodial parent] is a drastic remedy” appropriate only for compelling reasons and upon a showing of substantial evidence that visitation would be detrimental to the children (Matter of Robert TT v … Matter of Strempler v Savell, 287 AD2d 827, 828 [2001]).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2026 NY Slip Op 02168 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 2026

    <div>People v Brown - 2026 NY Slip Op 02168 <div> skip to main content </div> <div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website. … </p> </div> <div> <p>The People of the State of New York, Respondent,</p> <p>v</p> <p>Dennis Brown, Appellant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    156 A.D.3d 1492 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    107 A.D.3d 1305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 2013

    Kulk, 103 AD3d at 1039 ; People v McAleavey, 159 AD2d 646, 646 [1990]; People v Brown, 104 AD2d 696, 697 [1984], lv denied 64 NY2d 778 [1985]). … [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 927 [1992]; People v Brown, 104 AD2d at 697 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fischer

    72 A.D.3d 1320 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 2010

    Bezio, 67 AD3d 1223 [2009]; Matter of Peoples v Selsky, 33 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2006]). … The minor inconsistencies between the author’s testimony and the misbehavior report presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Lopez v Selsky, 28 AD3d 968, 968 [2006]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Winter v. Brown

    49 A.D.3d 526 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 2008

    Realty Corp. v Kaufman, 16 AD3d 688, 689-690 [2005]). … Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517 [1981]; New York City Off-Track Betting Corp. v New York Racing Assn., 250 AD2d 437, 441 [1998]).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Joseph

    285 A.D.2d 642 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 30, 2001

    A criminal defendant’s rights to discovery are contained in CPL article 240 (see, Matter of Pittari v Pirro, supra; Matter of Brown v Appelman, supra). … to act in good faith and to preserve all evidence to which a defendant is entitled (see, Matter of Brown v Appelman, supra).

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.