Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.64s

  • People v. Brown

    68 A.D.3d 1150 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 2009

    1157, 1158 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 742 [2009]; People v Thompkins, 58 AD3d 1068, 1068 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 822 [2009]). … 733 [2008]; People v McKeney, 45 AD3d 974, 975 [2007]).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Powers

    53 A.D. 251 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900

    (Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Hays v. Hathorn, 74 id. 486 ; Considerant v. Bris bane, 22 id. 389 ; Cummings v. Morris, 25 id. 625.) The Sheridan case is directly in point.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    62 A.D.3d 1089 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 14, 2009

    Applying the well-settled standards for review regarding legal sufficiency and weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]; see also People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]; People v Hall … Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; People v Davenport, 58 AD3d 892, 895 [2009]; People v Dunton, 19 AD3d 808, 808-809 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 805 [2005]).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    54 A.D.2d 585 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1976

    The constitutionality of second offender provisions has long been established (see People v Wilson, 13 NY2d 277 , app dsmd 377 US 925 ; People v Gowasky, 244 NY 451 ). Latham, Acting P.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Weinreb

    183 A.D.2d 562 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1992

    (See, Torpey v Sanders, 248 App Div 303, 305 .) Nor can liability be imposed on defendants for their failure to provide other safeguards to prevent injury.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    189 A.D.3d 701 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2020

    People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 08011 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 08011 Decided on December 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … Ind No. 3057/14 Appeal No. 12624 Case No. 2015-2477 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Brown, Defendant-Appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    134 N.Y.S.3d 742 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2020

    People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 07925 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 07925 Decided on December 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … HINDS-RADIX LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ. 2018-04377 [*1]People of State of New York, respondent, v Derrick Brown, appellant. Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Rebecca J. Gannon of counsel), for appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    82 A.D.3d 1698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 2011

    People v Wise, 49 AD3d 1198, 1199 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 940 [2008], reconsideration denied 10 NY3d 966 [2008]; People v Caballero, 23 AD3d 1031 , 1032 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 846 [2006]). … Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799 [1985]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. White

    3 A.D.3d 743 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 2004

    While interference with visitation can, under certain circumstances, be sufficient to warrant a change in custody (see Ahmad v Naviwala, 306 AD2d 588, 591 [2003], lv dismissed 100 NY2d 615 [2003]; Brodsky v Brodsky, 267 AD2d … 897, 898-899 [1999]), the paramount concern remains the best interest of the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Barney v Barney, 301 AD2d 950, 951 [2003]; Matter of Grenier v Allen, 296 AD2d 619, 620

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • BROWN & BROWN, INC. v. JOHNSON, THERESA A.

    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

    BROWN & BROWN, INC. AND BROWN & BROWN OF NEW YORK, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V OPINION AND ORDER THERESA A. … Same Opinion by WHALEN, J. as in Brown & Brown, Inc. v Johnson, et al. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 7, 2014]). Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Brown

    23 A.D.3d 625 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 28, 2005

    Car Sys., supra; Bent v Jackson, supra; Urbanski v Mulieri, supra). … ]; Papadonikolakis v First Fid.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    107 A.D.3d 819 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 12, 2013

    defendant was made aware of the postrelease supervision component of his sentence at the outset of the sentencing proceeding, and nonetheless failed to move to withdraw his plea prior to the imposition of sentence (see People v … People v McAlpin, 17 NY3d 936, 938 [2011]; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545-546 [2007]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Welty v. Brown

    57 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1977

    This court will not disturb such a determination unless it is not reasonably grounded (Kielman v Enterprise Stores, 38 AD2d 629 ). … This court has, on occasion, awarded new trials unless the defendant agreed to stipulate to increase the verdict (Rivera v Presbyterian Hosp., 55 AD2d 998 ; Bonder v Berman, 43 AD2d 653 ).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    41 A.D.3d 1234 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 2007

    County Court was not required to “ ‘engage in any particular litany’ ” (People v Calvi, 89 NY2d 868, 871 [1996]; see People v Looney, 20 AD3d 926 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 807 [2005]; People v Brown, 281 AD2d 962 [2001], lv … The plea allocution establishes that the waiver of the right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see Calvi, 89 NY2d at 871 ; Looney, 20 AD3d 926 [2005]; Brown, 281 AD2d at 962 ), even though some

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Popolizio

    166 A.D.2d 44 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1991

    (Matter of Hines v New York City Hous. Auth., supra, at 1001; and see, Matter of Knox v Christian, 96 AD2d 490 ; Matter of Edwards v Christian, 61 AD2d 1045 , affd 46 NY2d 964 .) … The punishment of terminating petitioners’ tenancies under the circumstances presented was " ' "so disproportionate to the offense[s] * * * as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Ennis v. Brown

    36 N.Y.S. 737 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 14, 1896

    Towar v. Hale, 46 Barb. 361 ; Greenwood Lake & P. J. R. Co. v. New York & G. L. R. Co., 134 N. Y. 435 , 31 N. E. 874 . … O’Connor v. Huggins, 113 N. Y. 511 , 21 N. E. 184 ; Shriver v. Shriver, 86 N. Y. 575 . No reasonable doubt attends upon this title. The same is good and marketable.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    68 A.D.2d 503 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 1979

    People v Bieniek, 60 AD2d 777 ; People v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 224, 227-228 [Birns, J.]). … Brown’s life; that Mr. Monges first met Mr.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    101 A.D.3d 1627 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 2012

    Ingram, 217 AD2d 986, 987 [1995]; see generally People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, 168-169 [1974], cert denied 419 US 1012 [1974]). … “[T]he right to counsel does not include the right to delay” (People v Arroyave, 49 NY2d 264, 273 [1980] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Weissberg

    22 A.D.2d 282 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 1964

    Plaintiff’s affidavit of merits is utterly vacuous of evidentiary facts and is therefore hopelessly insufficient (Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A D 2d 25, 31-32). … In this case, unlike the situation in Mulinos v. Coliseum Constr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Brown

    258 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 11, 1999

    counsel, is without evidentiary value because counsel had no personal knowledge of the facts, and therefore was insufficient to defeat the plaintiffs prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.