Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.74s
43 A.D.3d 594 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 9, 2007
The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant (see Secore v Allen, 27 AD3d 825, 828-829 [2006]). … The varying versions of the accident present factual issues for trial (see Ramos v Rojas, 37 AD3d 291, 292 [2007]; Secore v Allen, supra at 828-829 ).
Cited 5 timesPublished186 A.D.3d 1105 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 20, 2020
People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 04700 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 04700 Decided on August 20, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Cited 0 timesPublished133 A.D.3d 1333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 2015
award visitation depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the assessments of character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents and grandparents” (Matter of Hilgenberg v … given to him by petitioners, and, as explained by petitioners’ expert, the negative impact that continued visitation with respondent could have on the child’s relationship with petitioners (see generally Matter of Ordona v
Cited 5 timesPublished98 A.D.3d 775 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 2, 2012
Fischer, 92 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2012]; Matter of Samuel v Fischer, 53 AD3d 960, 960 [2008]). … Fischer, 82 AD3d 1396, 1397 [2011]) and questioning the correction sergeant who interviewed the confidential source (see Matter of Williams v Fischer, 18 NY3d 888, 890 [2012]; Matter of Elliott v Fischer, 94 AD3d 1326, 1327
Cited 4 timesPublished153 A.D. 234 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1912
(See, too, Weed v. People, 56 N. Y. 628 ; also United States v. Gordon, 5 Blatchf. 18, 29 ; Ex parte Williams, 26 Fla. 310 ; State of Iowa v. Jones, 115 Iowa, 113 ; Cleek v. Commonwealth, 21 Gratt. 777 .) … (See Lattimore v. People, 10 How. Pr. 336 ; People v. Quimby, 72 Misc. Rep. 421 ; People v. Starks, 17 N. Y. St. Repr. 234, and like cases.).
Cited 13 timesPublished286 A.D.2d 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 2001
Hearing Officer may provide substantial evidence to support a determination of guilt where the Hearing Officer makes an independent assessment and determines that the information is reliable and credible” (Matter of Vega v … Although there are intermittent gaps in the hearing transcript, they are not so significant as to preclude meaningful review (see, Matter of Jackson v Goord, 263 AD2d 726 , lv denied 94 NY2d 753 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished307 A.D.2d 759 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 3, 2003
properly before us inasmuch as there is no notice of appeal from the original judgment in the record before us, nor is there otherwise any indication in the record that an appeal from that judgment was perfected (see People v … Reddy, 227 AD2d 961 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 1024 [1996]; People v Dabbs, 178 AD2d 848 [1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 946 [1992]).
Cited 5 timesPublished11 A.D.3d 834 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 2004
v New York City Health & Hosps. … Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995], quoting Moffatt v Moffatt, 86 AD2d 864 , 864 [1982], affd 62 NY2d 875 [1984]; see McEachron v State Farm Ins.
Cited 13 timesPublished142 A.D.3d 1312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2016
We conclude that the court erred in granting a mistrial inasmuch as the jury verdict was not the product of substantial confusion among the jurors (see Martinez v Te, 75 AD3d 1, 6-7 [2010]; Luzardo v Jamaica Hall Corp., 296 … Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545-546 [1983]; Reynolds v Krebs, 81 AD3d 1269, 1271 [2011]; Fleiss v South Buffalo Ry.
Cited 4 timesPublished9 A.D.3d 646 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 8, 2004
The misbehavior reports, as well as the videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see Matter of Morales v Goord, 290 AD2d 790, 791 [2002]; Matter of Green v Selsky, 284 AD2d 617, 618 [ … 986, 987 [2003]; Matter of Morales v Goord, supra at 791).
Cited 6 timesPublished9 A.D. 369 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1896
Cited 8 timesPublished111 A.D.3d 1385 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2013
Peay, 77 AD3d 1309, 1310 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 955 [2010]; see People v Heary, 104 AD3d 1208, 1210 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 943 [2013], reconsideration denied 21 NY3d 1016 [2013]; see generally People v Prochilo, 41 … evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).
Cited 7 timesPublished187 A.D.3d 1604 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2020
People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 05427 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 05427 Decided on October 2, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … MOTION NO. (276/18) KA 12-01620. [*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v EUGENE S. BROWN, ALSO KNOWN AS EUGENE NESMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Cited 0 timesPublished53 A.D. 251 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900
(Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Hays v. Hathorn, 74 id. 486 ; Considerant v. Bris bane, 22 id. 389 ; Cummings v. Morris, 25 id. 625.) The Sheridan case is directly in point.
Cited 15 timesPublished62 A.D.3d 1089 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 14, 2009
Applying the well-settled standards for review regarding legal sufficiency and weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]; see also People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]; People v Hall … Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; People v Davenport, 58 AD3d 892, 895 [2009]; People v Dunton, 19 AD3d 808, 808-809 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 805 [2005]).
Cited 15 timesPublished54 A.D.2d 585 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1976
The constitutionality of second offender provisions has long been established (see People v Wilson, 13 NY2d 277 , app dsmd 377 US 925 ; People v Gowasky, 244 NY 451 ). Latham, Acting P.
Cited 8 timesPublished66 A.D.2d 223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1979
Dennis, 537 SW2d 652 [Mo]; Lillard v State, 528 SW2d 207 [Tenn]; Mikell v State, 242 Ala 298), and in our view the criminal transaction here, as outlined above, requires a similar conclusion. … Tanner, 30 NY2d 102 [robbery and murder]; People v McMillan, 61 AD2d 800 [burglary and rape]).
Cited 30 timesPublished183 A.D.2d 562 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1992
(See, Torpey v Sanders, 248 App Div 303, 305 .) Nor can liability be imposed on defendants for their failure to provide other safeguards to prevent injury.
Cited 20 timesPublished120 N.Y.S.3d 631 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 2, 2020
People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 02172 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 02172 Decided on April 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on April 2, 2020 Renwick, J.P., Richter, Mazzarelli, Singh, JJ. 11337 1076/17 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S.
Cited 0 timesPublished271 A.D.2d 717 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 2000
Since the trial court is presented with the unique opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witnesses testifying before it and to assess their credibility (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, supra, at 173; Matter of Slattery v Slattery … Short, 229 AD2d 676, 677 ; Matter of Sweet v Passno, 206 AD2d 639, 640 ).
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna