Case law

Brown v. Brown

185 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 3, 1992

McClure, 176 AD2d 325, 326 ; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444 ; Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg, 127 AD2d 766 ; see also, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 ). … Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929 ; see also, Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611 ; Kilmer v Kilmer, 109 AD2d 1004 ; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 842, at 194).

Brown v. Brown

242 A.D. 33 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 1934

(Starbuck v. Starbuck, 173 N. Y. 503 ; Kelsey v. Kelsey, 204 App. Div. 116 ; affd., 237 N. Y. 520 ; Matter of Swales, 60 App. Div. 599 ; Simmonds v. Simmonds, 78 Misc. 571 .) … affirmance, with an additional finding of fact to the effect that the plaintiff herein had knowledge and acted in aid of the invalid divorce proceeding instituted in South Dakota by the present defendant against Vivina Haynes Brown

Brown v. Brown

12 A.D.3d 176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 2004

“Beneficiaries enjoy only expectancy interests and not vested legal rights” (Blackmon v Estate of Battcock, 78 NY2d 735, 739 [1991]). … Capital v Karp Family Assoc., 285 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]). In any event, the tort claims were merely duplicative of the insufficiently pleaded breach of contract causes of action herein.

Brown v. Brown

123 A.D.3d 596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 2014

enumerated factors, explained how the factors support an upward deviation from the $13,100 a month in guideline support, and found that $37,000 per month was not “unjust or inappropriate” under the circumstances (Lennox v … The court providently exercised its discretion in making the award of temporary maintenance taxable to the wife (see Lasry *597 v Lasry, 180 AD2d 488, 489 [1st Dept 1992]; Siskind v Siskind, 89 AD3d 832, 833 [2d Dept 2011

Brown v. Brown

136 A.D.3d 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 2016

In September 2005, Linton Brown executed a durable power of attorney naming his daughter Glenisha Brown as his attorney-in-fact as to certain matters. … Corp. v Tycoon Collections, Inc., 73 AD3d 719, 721 [2010]; Halstead v Dolphy, 70 AD3d 639, 639-640 [2010]).

Brown v. Brown

203 A.D. 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 29, 1922

Brown, deceased. The respondents are the executors and trustees appointed therein. The appellant is the widow of the testator. … Brown.

Brown v. Brown

148 A.D.2d 377 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 1989

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irving Kirschenbaum, J.), entered on or about June 7, 1988, which, inter alia, denied defendant Arthur Brown’s motion to vacate his default, granted plaintiff … *378 Delaine Brown’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, and set out details of the distribution of real and personal property between the parties, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts, to the extent

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 673 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 2012

The Family Court’s determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Wispe v Leandry, 63 AD3d 853 [2009]; Matter of Franklin v Richey, 57 AD3d at 664 ). … (see Matter of Solovay v Solovay, 94 AD3d 898, *675 900 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 808 [2012]; Matter of Nell v Nell, 87 AD3d 541, 542-543 [2011]).

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

52 A.D.3d 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 2008

Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 742 [1996]; Matter of Gutiy v Gutiy, 40 AD3d 1155, 1156 [2007]; Matter of Winn v Cutting, 39 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2007]; Matter of Armstrong v Crout, 33 AD3d 1079, 1079-1080 [2006]). … We note that Family Court did not speak to the children about the proposed move (see Matter of Cornell v Cornell, 8 AD3d 718, 719 [2004]; Grandin v Grandin, 8 AD3d 710, 712 [2004]; see also Matter of Gravelding v Loper, 42

Brown v. Brown

130 A.D.3d 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 22, 2015

Kass, 115 AD3d 748 [2014]; Matter of Gordon v Goldin, 95 AD3d 1115 [2012]). … Shangraw, 61 AD3d 1302, 1304 [2009]; Kelly v Kelly, 19 AD3d 1104 , 1106 [2005]; Matter of Stewart v Stewart, 222 AD2d 895, 896-897 [1995]; cf.

Brown v. Brown

122 A.D.2d 762 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 4, 1986

v Brown, 122 Misc 2d 849, 850 ). … However, even when the correct preponderance of the evidence standard is applied (see, Smith v Smith, 88 AD2d 658 ; Spillman v Spillman, 67 *764 AD2d 942 , affd 49 NY2d 745 ), the record supports the court’s determination

Brown v. Brown

39 A.D.2d 897 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1972

Brown v. Brown

87 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 1982

(Lewis v Counts, 81 AD2d 857 ). … from the prosecutor’s conduct (see Chmielewski v Smith, 73 AD2d 1053 ).

Brown v. Brown

153 A.D. 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 6, 1912

The learned court based its decision upon Berry v. Berry ( 130 App. Div. 53 ). … While the equitable principle, made the basis of our decision in Berry v.

Brown v. Brown

34 A.D.2d 907 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1970

Although it is within the power of the trial court to provide that permanent alimony and child support payments shall be paid from the commencement of an action for divorce or separation (Forrest v. Forrest, 25 1ST. … Y. 501; Burr v. Burr, 10 Paige ch. 20; Lowe v.

Brown v. Brown

31 A.D.2d 516 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1968

(Brownstein v. Brownstein, 25 A D 2d 205, 208; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A D 2d 706, affd. 3 N Y 2d 967.)

Brown v. Brown

101 N.Y.S. 1114 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1906

Brown v. Brown

190 A.D.2d 668 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 1993

The proper procedure would have been for the appellant to move to open her default and to vacate the order dated January 28, 1992, and if necessary, appeal from the denial of the motion to vacate the default (see, Grober v … Busigo, 133 AD2d 389 ; Imor v Imor, 114 AD2d 552 ; Calvagno v Nationwide Mut.