Case law

Brown v. Board of Education

16 A.D.2d 634 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 17, 1962

Brown v. Board of Education

253 A.D. 318 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 1938

On permission granted by this court defendant Board of Education of the City of New York appeals from an affirmance *319 by the Appellate Term of a judgment of the City Court, Bronx County, in plaintiffs’ favor in the sum … In view of the testimony in plaintiffs’ case at the trial, these contemporaneous written statements, which a regulation of the board of education required to be taken, were very important.

People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Board of Parole

133 A.D.2d 792 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 19, 1987

Gonzales v Dalsheim, supra, at 14-15; People ex rel. Delgado v Walters, 91 AD2d 1053 ). … P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Town of Oyster Bay, Board of Zoning Appeals

55 A.D.2d 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 1976

In 1973 petitioners applied to the board of zoning appeals for a variance on the ground that the conditions which had been originally imposed were so onerous that it was impossible to operate the gift shop.

R. D. Brown, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

4 A.D.2d 926 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 30, 1957

(See Matter of Taylor v. Vion, 285 App. Div. 1152 .) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Supreme Court in proceedings to review assessments on property in the city of Buffalo.) Present—MeCurn, P.

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County

171 A.D. 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1915

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors

170 A.D. 358 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 1915

Brown v. Bd. of Suprs., Suffolk Co. ( 170 App. Div. 364 ), decided herewith. Ballot 250, second district of North Hempstead. The ballot is unobjectionable in form. … Brown’s count should be denied. Hogan, J., in the Court of Appeals (People ex rel. Brown v. Freisch, 215 N.

Brown v. Board of Elections

87 A.D.3d 947 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 7, 2011

petitioner is not qualified to hold the public office of District Attorney for the County of Queens, since he is not an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York or any other jurisdiction (see Matter of Curry v

Matter of Brown v. Board of Parole N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision

2021 NY Slip Op 05003 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 16, 2021

Matter of Brown v Board of Parole N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision ( 2021 NY Slip Op 05003 ) Matter of Brown v Board of Parole N.Y. … Decided and Entered:September 16, 2021 533052 [*1]In the Matter of Rohan Brown, Appellant, v Board of Parole — New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Brown-Conte Equities, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

121 A.D.2d 629 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 1986

Board of Assessors ( 45 NY2d 538, 542 ) and G.R.F., Inc. v Board of Assessors ( 41 NY2d 512 ). … P., Brown, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Brown v. New York State Board of Parole

78 A.D.2d 535 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1980

months and (2) remitted the matter to the board for the establishment of a new MPI not to exceed one third of the maximum of petitioner’s sentence. … Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits (see Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69 , revg 69 AD2d 520 ). Mollen, P.

Matter of Brown v. Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y.

156 A.D.3d 451 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 2017

Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605 , 606 [1st Dept 2014]; Matter of Cohn v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 102 AD3d 586 , 587 [1st Dept 2013]). … A petitioner bears the burden of proving bad faith, and merely asserting it is insufficient to satisfy that burden (Matter of Witherspoon v Horn, 19 AD3d 250, 251 [1st Dept 2005]; Pagan v Board of Educ. of City School Dist

Brown v. Board of Education of the City School District

54 A.D.2d 944 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1976

Matter of Longarzo v Anker ( 49 AD2d 879 ), relied on by Special Term, is distinguishable. In Longarzo the assistant superintendent admitted that she did nothing on her own to verify the teacher’s unsatisfactory rating. … On those facts, we hold that there was sufficient compliance with section 41 (subd 3, *945 par [e]) of the by-laws of the board of education, as it then read. Latham, Acting P.

Brown v. Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole

55 A.D.2d 1017 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 14, 1977

Memorandum: Petitioner was denied parole on June 15, 1976 for reasons which were sufficient and meaningful as noted in Matter of Watkins v Caldwell ( 54 AD2d 42 ). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court —art 78.)

Brown v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the Police Department of New York

111 A.D.2d 75 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 16, 1985

In the first instance, petitioner would have been entitled to accidental disability retirement (Matter of Kelly v Board of Trustees, 47 AD2d 892 ; Matter of Costello v Board of Trustees, 63 AD2d 894 ). … Neither of the cases relied upon in the majority memorandum (Matter of Kelly v Board of Trustees, 47 AD2d 892 ; Matter of Costello v Board of Trustees, 63 AD2d 894 ) provides any support for that proposition.

Calim of Gomez v. Windows On the World

23 A.D.3d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 23, 2005

Matter of Barrow v Loon Lake Hotel, 3 AD2d 783, 783-784 [1957]; Matter of McLaskey v City of New York, 277 App Div 1068 , 1069 [1950]) and will instead review the record before us to ascertain whether the Board’s determination … Grill, supra at 884-885, with Matter of Brown, supra at 939, and Steele v Richardson, 472 F2d 49, 52-53 [1972]; see generally Dolan v Celebrezze, 381 F2d 231 [1967]), it is our view that Escalante has sufficiently established

Garcia v. New York State Division of Parole

239 A.D.2d 235 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1997

Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 AD2d 128, 133 ). … Moreover, the Board is not required to expressly discuss each of the guidelines in its determination (Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, supra, 83 NY2d, at 791 ).

Brown v. Brown

88 A.D.3d 1174 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 2011

Evidence regarding the mother’s forms of punishment, which partially led to an indicated report of inadequate guardianship, was sufficient to show a change of circumstances (see Matter of Terry I. v Barbara H., 69 AD3d 1146 … deference to that court’s credibility determinations and factual findings, which are supported by the record, the decision to modify physical custody has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Paul T. v

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 568 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2012

the circumstances” (Matter of Parliman v Labriola, 87 AD3d 1144, 1144 [2011]; see Matter of Nava v Kinsler, 85 AD3d 1186, 1186-1187 [2011]; Trinagel v Boyar, 70 AD3d 816 [2010]). … 898-899 [2012]; Matter of Picado v Doan, 90 AD3d 932 [2011]; White v Mazzella-White, 84 AD3d 1068 [2011]).

Brown v. Brown

239 A.D.2d 535 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 27, 1997

party’s maintenance or child support obligation, a court need not rely upon the party’s own account of his or her finances, but may impute income based upon the party’s past income or demonstrated earning potential (Kay v … Kay, 37 NY2d 632 ; Brodsky v Brodsky, 214 AD2d 599; Liadis v Liadis, 207 AD2d 331 ; Hollis v Hollis, 188 AD2d 960 ).