Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • People v. Brown

    2023 NY Slip Op 02083 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 25, 2023

    People v Brown ( 2023 NY Slip Op 02083 ) People v Brown 2023 NY Slip Op 02083 Decided on April 25, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 974/17 Appeal No. 86 Case No. 2019-4031 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jenisha Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Caprice R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    120 A.D.3d 1545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 26, 2014

    Alcide, 21 NY3d 687, 695 [2013]; People v Becoats, 17 NY3d 643, 651 [2011]). … denied 97 NY2d 678 [2001]; People v Sterina, 108 AD3d 1088, 1089 [2013]).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    154 A.D.3d 1004 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 5, 2017

    “Good cause determinations are necessarily case-specific and therefore fall within the discretion of the trial court” (People v Linares, 2 NY3d 507, 510 [2004]; see People v Smith, 18 NY3d 588, 592 [2012]; People v Toledo … Wren, 119 AD3d 1291, 1292 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1048 [2014]; People v Brown, 115 AD3d 1115, 1116 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 959 [2014]).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2023 NY Slip Op 00037 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 5, 2023

    People v Brown ( 2023 NY Slip Op 00037 ) People v Brown 2023 NY Slip Op 00037 Decided on January 05, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Ind No. 4659/16 Appeal No. 17035 Case No. 2019-2346 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donell Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Matthew W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fischer

    148 A.D.3d 1383 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 2017

    We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary determination also should be restored (see Matter of Lawrence v Annucci, 141 AD3d 1063, 1063 [2016]). … In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kirshtein v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision,

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Scheker v. Brown

    85 A.D.3d 1007 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 2011

    County of Suffolk, 10 NY3d 906, 908 [2008]; Gleason v Villegas, 81 AD3d 889, 890 [2011] ; Klopchin v Masri, 45 AD3d 737 [2007]). … Co., 65 AD3d 1110 [2009]; Guerra v Cantos, 38 AD3d 714 [2007]; Rozengauz v Lok Wing Ha, 280 AD2d 534 [2001]). Skelos, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    149 A.D.3d 584 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 2017

    The People thus adequately explained on the record the reasons for the change from readiness on October 25 to unreadiness on November 7 (see People v Brown, 28 NY3d 392 [2016]). … ’s omnibus motion on the second indictment (see People v Brown, 99 NY2d 488, 492 [2003]), and from the People’s need for “a reasonable time to prepare after the court’s decision on motions” (People v Davis, 80 AD3d 494, 494

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2022 NY Slip Op 02655 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2022

    People v Brown ( 2022 NY Slip Op 02655 ) People v Brown 2022 NY Slip Op 02655 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … DAVONTAE BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Burtman v. Brown

    97 A.D.3d 156 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 2012

    (Dallas-Stephenson v Waisman, 39 AD3d 303 [1st Dept 2007].) … (See Maggio v Werner, 213 AD2d 883, 884 [3d Dept 1995], citing Markley v Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp., 163 AD2d 639, 640 [3d Dept 1990]; see also Wasserman v Staten Is.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Patterson

    108 A.D.3d 1131 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2013

    , 1010-1011 [2006]; Matter of Wilson v Bennett, 282 AD2d 933, 934 [2001]). … ]; see Kuhn v Kuhn, 129 AD2d 967, 967 [1987]; see also CPLR 5512 [a]).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    142 A.D.3d 769 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 1, 2016

    The verdict as to Brown and Layne was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). … Defendants Brown’s and Layne’s argu- *771 merits regarding the scope of our review of the court’s ruling are unavailing (see People v Nicholson, 26 NY3d 813 [2016]; People v Garrett, 23 NY3d 878 , 885 n 2 [2014]).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    85 A.D.3d 750 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 2011

    The Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that the defendant be classified as a level three sex offender. … The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender (see People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920 [2011]; People v

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shields v. Brown

    107 A.D.3d 1005 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 2013

    In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Gary Brown appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated February 23, 2012, which, after a hearing, in effect … Here, a fair preponderance of the credible evidence elicited at the fact-finding hearing supports the hearing court’s determination that Gary Brown committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree and disorderly

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sanders

    142 A.D.3d 940 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 14, 2016

    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v Albert, 78 AD3d 983, 984 [2010]). … The plaintiff exhibited a lack of diligence in commencing the action, and failed to establish a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Navarrete v Metro PCS, 137 AD3d 1230, 1231 [2016]; Agudo v Zhinin, 94 AD3d 680,

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fischer

    98 A.D.3d 778 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 2, 2012

    misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing and confidential information, supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of conspiring with his girlfriend to smuggle drugs into the correctional facility (see Matter of Ware v … negate petitioner’s guilt, as violation of those rules occurred when petitioner solicited and conspired with another to bring the drugs into the facility (see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xv]; [15] [i]; see also Matter of Sanders v

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    122 A.D.3d 536 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 25, 2014

    As such, we find it unnecessary to determine the propriety of the assessment of the contested points (see People v Lucas, 118 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2014]). … 100, the court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure, since the mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument (see People v

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Phillbert

    2020 NY Slip Op 06847 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 2020

    Brown v Phillbert ( 2020 NY Slip Op 06847 ) Brown v Phillbert 2020 NY Slip Op 06847 Decided on November 19, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … Index No. 27283/17E Appeal No. 12426 Case No. 2020-02348 [*1]Corretta Brown, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Audrey Phillbert et al., Defendants-Appellants. Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, New York (Jeffrey B.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Askew

    2022 NY Slip Op 00795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 2022

    Brown v Askew ( 2022 NY Slip Op 00795 ) Brown v Askew 2022 NY Slip Op 00795 Decided on February 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … , v JASON E.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2026 NY Slip Op 01131 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 26, 2026

    People v Brown (2026 NY Slip Op 01131) People v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 01131 Decided on February 26, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Ind No. 73482/22|Appeal No. 5928|Case No. 2023-03543| [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shiv R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2023 NY Slip Op 02592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 2023

    People v Brown ( 2023 NY Slip Op 02592 ) People v Brown 2023 NY Slip Op 02592 Decided on May 11, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Ind No. 2957/17 78/19 Appeal No. 235-235A Case No. 2019-1427 2019-03468 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antoine Brown, Defendant-Appellant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.