Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.98s
276 A.D.2d 269 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 5, 2000
Cited 0 timesPublished121 A.D.2d 733 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 30, 1986
handcuffs were dangling from their hands (see, People v Adams, supra; People v Osgood, 89 AD2d 76, 81 ). … Under the circumstances, a reasonable possibility existed that the constitutional error contributed to the defendant’s conviction, and a new trial is therefore warranted (see, People v Almestica, 42 NY2d 222 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished237 A.D.2d 221 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 1997
Cited 1 timesPublished273 A.D.2d 160 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 2000
Cited 0 timesPublished308 A.D.2d 379 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2003
Cotto, 92 NY2d 68 [1998]; People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359, 370 [1995]; see also United States v Mastrangelo, 693 F2d 269 [1982]). … Accordingly, defendant made an informed waiver of any right to cross-examine the eyewitness concerning her trial testimony (compare Cotto v Herbert, 331 F3d 217, 248-253 [2003]).
Cited 2 timesPublished279 A.D.2d 634 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 2001
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 ). … AD2d 434 ; People v Sosa, 258 AD2d 312 ; People v Simons, 158 AD2d 728 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished283 A.D.2d 1004 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 2, 2001
Cited 2 timesPublished260 A.D.2d 390 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1999
However, the record does not reveal any strategic or other legitimate explanation for counsel’s withdrawal of the application to suppress the gun prior to the hearing (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 ). *391 Further … Ramos, 68 AD2d 748 ; People v Korjus, 54 AD2d 720 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished166 A.D. 611 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 1915
(Gilmour v. Colcord, 183 N. Y. 342 ; Mitchell v. Dunmore Realty Co., 135 App. Div. 583 . See, too, Abbott v. Easton, 195 N. Y. 372 .) … (Newton v. Hook, 48 N. Y. 676 ; Goebel v. Iffla, 111 id. 170; Ostrander v. Hart, 130 id. 406.) The judgment is affirmed, with costs. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Cited 2 timesPublished262 A.D.2d 71 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublished246 A.D.2d 648 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 1998
his order, issued orally on September 22, 1997, that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, not accept, and that the petitioner not attempt to file, a certificate of readiness in a criminal action entitled People v … The extraordinary remedy of prohibition is not granted as of right but only in the sound discretion of the reviewing court (see, Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished6 A.D.2d 766 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 16, 1958
(See Bernstock v. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, 257 App. Div. 1004 ; Matter of Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co., 267 App. Div. 831 ; Oppenheimer v. Duophoto Corp., 271 App. Div. 1005 ; Matter of Myer v. Myer, 271 App.
Cited 2 timesPublished178 A.D.2d 484 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1991
However, the three interviews conducted by bank personnel were devoid of active governmental participation and thus Miranda warnings were not required (see, People v Ray, 65 NY2d 282 , 286). … Yukl, 25 NY2d 585 , cert denied 400 US 851 ; see also, People v Bailey, 140 AD2d 356 ; People v Oates, 104 AD2d 907 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished290 A.D.2d 627 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 3, 2002
Given the existence of triable issues that cannot be resolved as a matter of law (see, Persaud v Shark Patrol, 267 AD2d 41 ), Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion.
Cited 1 timesPublished263 A.D. 395 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 2, 1942
Y. 127, 140, 141 ; Robinson v. Insurance Co. of North America, 198 id. 523, 527; Bresslin v. Star Co., 166 App. Div. 89, 91 , and cases cited; Hurley v. Olcott, 134 id. 631, 639; Thomas v. … (Walsh v. Frankenthaler, 186 App. Div. 62, 64 ; Cattini v. American Railway Express Co., 202 id. 336, 344; affd., 234 N. Y. 585 ; Philpot v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co., 142 App. Div. 811 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished265 A.D.2d 443 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublished57 A.D.2d 1020 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1977
Whatever the practice may have been prior to adoption of the Domestic Relations Law (see Baker v Baker, 17 AD2d 924 ; Sussman v Sussman, 13 AD2d 464), we are aware of no current statutory or decisional authority that precludes
Cited 0 timesPublished5 A.D.2d 1002 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1958
Cited 1 timesPublished49 A.D. 508 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900
(Richards v. Kinsley, 14 N. Y. St. Repr. 701.) … Repr. 716; McKenzie v. Fox, 29 id. 106 ; Pomeroy Rem. & Rem. R. §§ 455, 456.)
Cited 1 timesPublished74 A.D. 359 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1902
(Ruel v. Tatnell, 43 L. T. Rep. 507; Miller v. Buckdon. 2 Bulst. 10 ; Peake v. Oldham, Cowp. 275 ; Young v. Cook, 144 Mass. 38 .) … (Brettun v. Anthony, 103 Mass. 37 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna