Case law

People v. Brown

25 A.D.3d 384 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 2006

The panelist’s response was not rendered equivocal by the court’s use of the word “think” in its inquiry (see People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]). … The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]; People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292

People v. Brown

152 A.D.2d 950 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 12, 1989

The evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, does not support his proffered defense of justification (see, People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96 ; People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299 ).

People v. Brown

121 A.D.2d 732 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 30, 1986

The issue, therefore, is not preserved for review (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 279-280 ; People v Lipton, 54 NY2d 340, 351 ; People v Wright, 115 AD2d 677 ; People v La Bombard, 99 AD2d 851 ).

People v. Brown

199 A.D.2d 327 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1993

Under these circumstances, the motion of the defendant’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned (see, People v Davis, 73 NY2d 864 ; People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906 ; People … v Pritchett, 149 AD2d 741 ).

Brown v. Divine

254 A.D. 671 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1938

People v. Brown

208 A.D.2d 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1994

Accordingly, it was improper for the court to impose an increased sentence when the defendant failed to successfully complete the program, without affording her an opportunity to withdraw her plea (see, People v Rodney E. … , 77 NY2d 672 ; People v Johnson, 197 AD2d 638 ; People v Spina, 186 AD2d 9 ).

People v. Brown

284 A.D.2d 156 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 12, 2001

The caller’s version of the events was corroborated in considerable detail (see, People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 575-577 ; People v Brown, 80 NY2d 729, 737 ), and the alleged discrepancies between the caller’s account and … Roberts, 448 US 56, 66 ; People v Kello, 96 NY2d 740, 743-744 ).

Brown v. Terry

67 A.D. 223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1901

Similar to this is the case of Kimmer v. Weber ( 151 N. … (Perry v. Rogers, 157 N. Y. 251 ; Loughlin v. State of New York, 105 id. 159.) The present case is within these decisions.

People v. Brown

121 A.D.2d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 31, 1986

Martin, Jr., J.), entered on or about March 15, 1985, which granted defendant Rod Brown’s motion to suppress statements made to Police Officers Madigan, Accordino and Frain, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny defendant … (See, People v Jamison, 73 AD2d 853 .)

People v. Brown

198 A.D.3d 1370 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 05433 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 05433 Decided on October 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … AKEEM BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Brown v. Keating

309 A.D.2d 1106 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 30, 2003

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Brown

111 A.D.3d 593 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 6, 2013

Bank N.A. v Allen, 102 AD3d 955 [2013]; US Bank N.A. v Tate, 102 AD3d 859 [2013]; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Hunter, 100 AD3d 810 [2012]; Bank of N.Y. v Stradford, 55 AD3d 765, 766 [2008]). … Bank N.A. v Slavinski, 78 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2010]).

People v. Brown

218 A.D.2d 813 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 28, 1995

; People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101 ; People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350 , affd 500 US 352 ; People v Smith, 192 AD2d 628 ). … 204 AD2d 92 , affd 84 NY2d 879 ; People v Ellsworth, 176 AD2d 127 ).

People v. Brown

230 A.D.2d 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 26, 1996

McFarlane, 205 AD2d 447, 448 ; People v Halbert, 175 AD2d 88 , affd 80 NY2d 865 , cert denied 507 US 922 ; People v Ribowsky, 156 AD2d 726 ). … The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor failed to correct false testimony given by one of his witnesses (see, People v Steadman, 82 NY2d 1 ; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554 ) is without merit (cf., People v Olmo, 153

People v. Brown

155 A.D.2d 547 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 1989

A reasonable man in the defendant’s position, innocent of any crime, would not have believed himself to be in custody (see, People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589 ; People v Goddard, 150 AD2d 794 ). … These crimes consist of separate acts, and concurrent terms of incarceration are not mandated by Penal Law § 70.25 (2) (see, People v Day, 73 NY2d 208 ; People v Tanner, 30 NY2d 102, 108 ; People v Ferkins, 116 AD2d 760,

Arthur-Brown v. Ramirez

2025 NY Slip Op 01039 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 20, 2025

Arthur-Brown v Ramirez (2025 NY Slip Op 01039) Arthur-Brown v Ramirez 2025 NY Slip Op 01039 Decided on February 20, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … Index No. 5373/22|Appeal No. 3750|Case No. 2024-02450| [*1]Allison Arthur-Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Leticia Ramirez, et al., Defendants-Respondents. Allison Arthur-Brown, appellant pro se.

People v. Brown

169 A.D.2d 528 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 1991

manner, in the area the robberies had previously occurred, at the same time of day, and as he matched a reasonably detailed description of the suspect it was more probable than not that defendant was the perpetrator (People v … (People v Falciglia, 153 AD2d 795 , affd 75 NY2d 935 .) We have considered defendants remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Brown v. James

9 A.D. 139 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1896

People v. Brown

233 A.D.2d 228 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 21, 1996

police minutes following defendant’s unlawful arrest provided an independent basis for probable cause, thereby severing any causal relationship between the unlawful arrest and the subsequent lineup identification (People v … Brown, 215 AD2d 333 , lv withdrawn 86 NY2d 791 ).

Brown v. English

122 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 31, 1910