Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

2.23s

  • Brown v. Milando

    267 A.D.2d 412 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 1999

    judicata only applies to the same transaction or series of transactions; it does not extend to all causes of action arising out of a course of dealing between parties and those in privity with them (see, Matter of Reilly v … Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    175 A.D.2d 952 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 1991

    Hines, 155 AD2d 722, 725 , lv denied 76 NY2d 736 ; People v Brown, 151 AD2d 199, 203 , lv denied 75 NY2d 768 ). … The subsequent search of the entire vehicle at the police station, including the trunk, was then proper to look for further evidence relating to the crime (see, People v Ellis, 62 NY2d 393, 398 ; People v Ali, 131 AD2d 857

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ziti v. Brown

    102 A.D.2d 825 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1984

    reversed, on the law, with costs to defendants payable by Mot Cab Corp., motion granted, and complaint dismissed. 11 Thomas Ziti was injured when the taxicab he was driving was struck by a van driven by defendant Michael Brown … Brown. Thereafter Ziti and his wife commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services, etc. In their bill of particulars plaintiffs alleged that defendants were negligent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    24 A.D.3d 271 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 2005

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frascogna v. Brown

    28 A.D.3d 1171 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 28, 2006

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    277 A.D.2d 972 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2000

    Conforti, 263 AD2d 513, 514 , lv denied 94 NY2d 878 ; see, People v Mailey, 262 AD2d 977 ; People v Sims, 217 AD2d 912 , lv denied 87 NY2d 851 ). … The jury may not use a magnifying glass for the impermissible purpose of comparing fingerprints (see, People v Moody, 195 AD2d 1016, 1017 ; People v Fields [appeal *973 No. 1], 152 AD2d 958 , lv denied 75 NY2d 812 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. LaTorella

    229 A.D.2d 391 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1996

    the People to provide a copy of the Grand Jury minutes to the defendants once the court has made a determination on whether the evidence adduced before the Grand Jury was legally sufficient (see, CPL 210.30 [3]; Matter of Brown … v Rotker, 215 AD2d 378 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Toia

    59 A.D.2d 1044 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1977

    One of these accounts was entitled "Marion Brown [petitioner] in trust for Marion Brush” (daughter) and the other account was entitled "Marion Brown in trust for Ernest Brown”, (son). … As was noted in Matter of Mondello v D’Elia ( 39 NY2d 978, 980 , supra), the department possesses no plenary legislative power (cf. Matter of Hudson v Sipprell, 76 Mise 2d 684).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    198 A.D.2d 424 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 22, 1993

    Under the totality of circumstances, we find that the defendant was provided meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796 ; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Rodriguez, 196 AD2d 514 ). … Broadie, 37 NY2d 100 , cert denied 423 US 950 ; People v Wilson, 190 AD2d 835 ; People v Buckmaster, 139 AD2d 659 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    303 A.D.2d 175 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2003

    that any of these incidents constituted false allegations and since defendant made no showing that the circumstances of these unrelated allegations bore a “significant probative relation” to the instant charges (People v … Accordingly, there was no violation of defendant’s right of confrontation (see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]). We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2021 NY Slip Op 07436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2021

    People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 07436 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 07436 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … RICHARD BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    251 A.D.2d 341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1998

    as to People’s exhibits 20 and 21, the People showed “ ‘circumstances providing] reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition’ ” of the canvas bag and bullets found near the defendant’s apartment (People v … Julian, 41 NY2d 340 , 343, quoting Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 35 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Eimicke

    144 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1988

    Coombs v Edwards, 280 NY 361 ; Matter of Corbeau Constr. … Corp. v Board of Educ., 32 AD2d 958 ). The proper procedure for compelling obedience to a subpoena is an application pursuant to CPLR 2308. We take no position on the merits of such an application.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    203 A.D.2d 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1994

    , People v Bond, 156 AD2d 573 ). … Soto, 198 AD2d 38 ; People v Fulmore, 133 AD2d 169, 170 ; see also, People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262, 271-272 ; People v Kirkland, 192 AD2d 414 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1075 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Riddell v. Brown

    32 A.D.3d 1212 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 2006

    Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her. … Brown is dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against June A.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moodie

    116 A.D.2d 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1986

    Tompkins v R. B. D. … It was clearly improper for the court to communicate with the juror in absence of the parties (see, Silverman v New Rochelle Hosp., 98 AD2d 774 ; Linke v Savage, 39 AD2d 326, 327 ; Gundersen v All Am.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Donaldson v. Brown

    24 A.D.2d 714 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 1965

    Assuming that the New York City Mayor’s Executive Order No. 49 (1958), adopted by the Board of Estimate and Apportionment, and the Rules and' Regulations of the *715 Commissioner of Marine and Aviation are valid and enforcible … Wood v. Board of Assessors, 137 N. Y. 201 ; Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist v. Cruise, 259 N. Y. 358 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hubbard v. Brown

    35 A.D. 254 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

    IV, art. 18; Stephens v. Vroman, 16 N. Y. 381 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    121 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1986

    This court affirmed the judgment (see, People v Brown, 92 AD2d 872 ). … This court has already considered the defendant’s sentence and, therefore, need not do so again (see, People v Brown, 92 AD2d 872 , revd on other grounds, 62 NY2d 743 , supra). Thompson, J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    161 A.D.2d 777 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 1990

    Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.