Case law

Brown v. Sherman

16 A.D. 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

The bill of sale bears date the 11th day of April, 1883, and one of. the considerations for the transfer of the property mentioned therein was the agreement of Clark to board and care for the vendor, Brown, and his family … Brown read the bill of sale- and knew its contents.

Alvarez v. Brown

256 A.D.2d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1998

This he failed to do (see, Shirley v Danziger, 252 AD2d 969 ). … Co., 62 NY2d 494 ; Murphy v Sachem Cent. School Dist., 147 AD2d 623 ; Bernstein v Birch Wathen School, 71 AD2d *531 129 ). Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Holliday

245 A.D. 814 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1935

In principle, the facts here are the same, though differing in degree, as those considered in Natelson v. A. B. L. Holding Co., Inc. ( 260 N. Y. 233 ); Fraw Realty Co. v. Natanson (261 id. 396); Hegstad v. … Div. 733 ), and Flaurn v. Kaiser Bros. Co. ( 66 Misc. 586 ; affd., 144 App. Div. 897 ). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

People v. Brown

42 A.D.3d 504 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 17, 2007

People v. Brown

235 A.D.2d 302 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 21, 1997

The showups were otherwise permissible (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541 ). Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Brown v. Williams

2022 NY Slip Op 04710 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 27, 2022

Brown v Williams ( 2022 NY Slip Op 04710 ) Brown v Williams 2022 NY Slip Op 04710 Decided on July 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … ZAYAS, JJ. 2019-09475 (Index No. 619838/17) [*1]Lorraine Brown, appellant, v Jaiquell Williams, et al., respondents. Kujawski & Kujawski, Deer Park, NY (Jennifer A. Spellman of counsel), for appellant.

Brown v. Decaudin

129 A.D.3d 875 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2015

. & Parking Corp. v Flushing Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., 68 AD3d 920 [2009]; Frydman v Fidelity Natl. Tit. Ins. Co., 68 AD3d 622, 623-624 [2009]; Backer v Bouza Falco Co., 28 AD3d 503 [2006]; New York State Higher Educ. … Corp. v Barry, 267 AD2d 567 [1999]).

People v. Brown

258 A.D.2d 662 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1999

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 ). Miller, J.

People v. Brown

198 A.D.2d 165 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 23, 1993

The currency found on defendant at the time of his arrest was properly admitted at trial on the ground that it was probative of defendant’s intent to sell the cocaine in his possession (People v Burgos, 192 AD2d 472 , lv

People v. Brown

239 A.D.2d 429 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1997

v Beniquez, 215 AD2d 678, 679 ). … Here, the trial court improperly altered its Sandoval ruling by permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine the defendant about his stabbing of Marie Brown.

Fernschild v. Brown

255 A.D. 983 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1938

People v. Brown

308 A.D.2d 547 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 2003

In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Brown v. Muthig

220 A.D.2d 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 19, 1995

While mindful that Labor Law § 240 is to be liberally construed for the purpose of protecting workers (see, Gordon v Eastern Ry. … Supply, 82 NY2d 555 ; Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509 ; Pigott v State of New York, 199 AD2d 734 ), defendants assert that plaintiff was not an "employee” pursuant to the statute. We disagree.

People v. Brown

267 A.D.2d 93 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1999

A witness’s failure to identify a defendant at a pretrial procedure goes to the weight of the witness’s in-court identification, not to its admissibility (People v Parks, 257 AD2d 636 , lv denied 93 NY2d 976 ; People v Spigner

People v. Brown

91 A.D.2d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1982

Moody, 52 AD2d 959 ; People v Skinner, 57 AD2d 785 ; People v Garcia, 76 AD2d 867 ). … Damiani, J.P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Wright

226 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 1996

The record indicates that the plaintiff’s administrative complaint was voluntarily withdrawn, and there is no indication that this was done for administrative convenience (see, Emil v Dewey, supra). … Federal Reserve Bank, 58 F3d 879 ; see also, Horowitz v Aetna Life Ins., 148 AD2d 584, 585 ).

Brown v. Hynes

21 A.D.3d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 8, 2005

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to vacate, as academic, a complaint and warrant issued under Kangs County Docket No. 9K045019 in a case entitled People v … Brown in the Supreme Court, Kings *415 County, under indictment No. 9463/89.

Brown v. Grossman

128 A.D. 496 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 6, 1908

Brown and Taub, “ Dear Sirs.—Kindly deliver to Freirich and Santman the goods they ordered on our account, and oblige, “ Respectfully yours, “ GROSSMAN & HECHT.” … , who said he did not care to sell Freirich & Santman, and thereupon the salesman went back to Santman and told him what Brown had said.

People v. Brown

207 A.D.2d 408 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 8, 1994

to impose the promised sentence, "the reasons for departing from the sentencing agreement must be placed upon the record to ensure effective appellate review of the sentencing *410 court’s exercise of discretion” (People v … Schultz, supra, at 758 ; see, People v Danny G., 61 NY2d 169, 174 ).

People v. Brown

128 A.D.2d 886 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 30, 1987

His dangerous and erratic driving justified the police action in stopping his car *887 and asking for his driver’s license, registration and insurance card (see, People v Vidal, 71 AD2d 962 ). … The sight of the holster prompted a reasonable inquiry regarding the whereabouts of a gun which the defendant then revealed by opening his jacket (see, People v Samuels, 50 NY2d 1035 , cert denied 449 US 984 ; CPL 140.50