Case law

People v. Brown

78 A.D.2d 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 24, 1980

Therefore, said error must be considered harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ; People v Cook, 42 NY2d 204, 208-209 ; People v Perez, 36 NY2d 848, 849-850 ).

Brown v. Brown

200 A.D.2d 439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1994

Finally, the award of pension benefits was appropriately determined in accordance with the principles set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas ( 61 NY2d 481 ), and the distribution of marital assets was otherwise equitable.

People v. Brown

46 A.D.3d 305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 2007

People v. Brown

45 A.D.3d 1400 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2007

People v. Brown

24 A.D.2d 740 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 14, 1965

Furthermore, some of the court are of the opinion the admission of the confession of the codefendant requires reversal in the interests of justice under People v. Donovan (13 N Y 2d 148). Concur — Breitel, J.

Brown v. Blumenfeld

45 A.D.3d 836 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 27, 2007

v Marcus, 23 AD3d 559, 560 [2005]; cf. … People v Landa, 28 AD3d 582, 583 [2006]). Lifson, J.P., Dillon, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

166 A.D.2d 762 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1990

v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146 ; see also, People v Benjamin, 151 AD2d 685, 686 ). … The prosecution provided the evidence to defense counsel immediately after its discovery so that defendant had sufficient time to effectively incorporate it into his defense (see, People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555, 559 , cert denied

Brown v. Singh

222 A.D.2d 392 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 1995

The plaintiff Derek Brown was operating the vehicle in which the plaintiff Michelle Brown was a passenger. … Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying Derek Brown’s motion to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaims for contribution against him (see, Matter of Torres v State of New York, 67 AD2d 814 ). Bracken, J.

People v. Brown

182 A.D.2d 691 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 13, 1992

Julian, 41 NY2d 340 , 343; People v Flores, 138 AD2d 512, 513 ; People v Piazza, 121 AD2d 573, 574 ; People v Jiminez, 100 AD2d 629 ). … , 33 NY2d 343, 347 ; People v Wilson, 168 AD2d 696, 698 ).

Bratone v. Conforti-Brown

150 A.D.3d 1068 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2017

The plaintiffs Arthur Bratone, Ronald Bratone, and Steven Bratone collectively own 50% of VSI’s stock, and the defendants, Linda Conforti-Brown and Martha Conforti, own the remaining 50% of VSI’s stock. … State of New York, 234 NY 309, 316 [1922]; see Goldschmidt v Ford St., LLC, 58 AD3d 803, 805 [2009]; Koudellou v Sakalis, 29 AD3d at 640 ; Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v State of New York, 26 AD3d 357 [2006]; Forsyth v Clauss

People v. Brown

176 A.D.2d 1232 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 1991

People v. Brown

130 A.D.2d 500 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 4, 1987

We have considered the issues raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit (see, United States v Crews, 445 US 463 ). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

30 A.D.3d 347 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 2006

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility.

People v. Brown

252 A.D.2d 598 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1998

At this time, the People indicated that there were no Sandoval, Molineux (see, People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 ) or Ventimiglia (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350 ) issues. … While CPL 240.43 requires disclosure of material “of which the prosecutor has knowledge”, it does not preclude consideration of after-acquired material (see, People v Brown, 202 AD2d 266, 267 , lv denied 83 NY2d 964 ).

People v. Brown

121 A.D.2d 326 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1986

v Lewis, 68 AD2d 862 ; People v Richards, 67 AD2d 893 ). … People v Skinner, 57 AD2d, at p 786 ).

People v. Brown

283 A.D.2d 312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2001

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). … Defendant’s application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 ) was properly denied.

People v. Brown

235 A.D.2d 344 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 1997

Martinez, 82 NY2d 436 ; see also, People v Rivera, 237 AD2d 178 ). … should be followed (People v Joseph, 85 AD2d 546 ).

People v. Brown

181 A.D.2d 1041 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 1992

Bailey, 159 AD2d 1009, 1010 ; People v Betances, 145 AD2d 961 ). … Further support for the inference that the gun did not belong to defendant is found in the fact that the gun was unloaded and no ammunition for it was found in the apartment (see, People v Bailey, supra).

Brown v. Holliday

245 A.D. 814 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1935

In principle, the facts here are the same, though differing in degree, as those considered in Natelson v. A. B. L. Holding Co., Inc. ( 260 N. Y. 233 ); Fraw Realty Co. v. Natanson (261 id. 396); Hegstad v. … Div. 733 ), and Flaurn v. Kaiser Bros. Co. ( 66 Misc. 586 ; affd., 144 App. Div. 897 ). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

Brown v. Sherman

16 A.D. 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

The bill of sale bears date the 11th day of April, 1883, and one of. the considerations for the transfer of the property mentioned therein was the agreement of Clark to board and care for the vendor, Brown, and his family … Brown read the bill of sale- and knew its contents.