Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.38s
79 A.D.3d 1766 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublished79 A.D.3d 1767 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublished208 A.D.2d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 13, 1994
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755 , cert denied 469 US 932 ), defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). … to prejudice the jury (People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821 ), and there is not a significant likelihood that this single comment affected the verdict (People v Pizzaro, supra), especially in light of the court’s corrective charge
Cited 4 timesPublished175 A.D.2d 210 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1991
671 ; People v Alvarez, 160 AD2d 885 ; People v Goggans, 155 AD2d 689 ). … 66 NY2d 796, 799-800 ; see also, People v Sullivan, 153 AD2d 223, 227 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished294 A.D.2d 751 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 23, 2002
thereof’ a period of postrelease supervision (Penal Law § 70.45 [1]), and “[flailure to advise a defendant of the statutorily required postrelease supervision requires that he be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea” (People v
Cited 4 timesPublished199 A.D.2d 41 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1993
As probationary employees, petitioners were subject to being terminated without a hearing and without any reasons stated therefor (Matter of Rivoli v Stern, 160 AD2d 601, 602 ). … for that of the administrative body as to the severity of the acknowledged behavior (see, Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567, 569 , lv denied 78 NY2d 855 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished6 A.D.3d 358 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2004
Ayala v New York, 522 US 1002 [1997]). … Herring, 83 NY2d 780 [1994]; People v Vaughan, 300 AD2d 104 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 633 [2003]; People v Leon, 295 AD2d 143 [2002]).
Cited 2 timesPublished258 A.D.2d 467 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1999
Even if we were to find that defendant’s proposed counterclaim validly set forth a cause of action for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Smith v Smith, 206 AD2d 255 , lv dismissed 84 NY2d 977 ) or … abandonment before the Referee would unjustifiably prejudice plaintiff by belatedly introducing an entirely new theory into the case (see, Symbax, Inc. v Bingaman, 219 AD2d 552, 553 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished59 A.D.3d 992 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 2009
The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants Anne Brown and Vincent Brown seeking to bifurcate the trial. … At the time of the incident, plaintiffs son was at premises owned by Anne Brown and Vincent Brown (defendants) and leased to the two remaining defendants, who owned the dog.
Cited 2 timesPublished135 A.D.2d 713 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 1987
The failure of the petitioner to acquire personal jurisdiction over the respondents is a fatal jurisdictional defect precluding further action by this court (see, Macchia v Russo, 67 NY2d 592 ). Thompson, J. … P., Brown, Fiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublished2024 NY Slip Op 03439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2024
People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 03439 ) People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 03439 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 10017/21) [*1]The People of the State of New York, appellant, v Kasson Brown, respondent. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Eric C. Washer, and Danielle M.
Cited 0 timesPublished309 A.D.2d 1084 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 30, 2003
]; People v Gonzalez, 299 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]). … v Goodings, 277 AD2d 725 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 735 [2001]).
Cited 2 timesPublished256 A.D.2d 42 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 1998
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing (see, People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 432-433 ). The People alleged that the police recovered counterfeit currency from defendant. … Defendant’s allegations did not establish any privacy interest in the currency seized, failing to confer upon him standing to move to suppress (see, People v Barshai, 100 AD2d 253 , lv denied 62 NY2d 804 , cert denied 469
Cited 5 timesPublished294 A.D.2d 241 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 23, 2002
Cited 2 timesPublished257 A.D.2d 467 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1999
Even if we were to find that defendant’s proposed counterclaim validly set forth a cause of action for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Smith v Smith, 206 AD2d 255 , lv dismissed 84 NY2d 977 ) or … abandonment before the Referee would unjustifiably prejudice plaintiff by belatedly introducing an entirely new theory into the case (see, Symbax, Inc. v Bingaman, 219 AD2d 552, 553 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished162 A.D.2d 695 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 25, 1990
v Almeida, 159 AD2d 508 ; People v Williams, 142 AD2d 310, 315). … Brown, J. P., Hooper, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished202 A.D.2d 514 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 14, 1994
The People established that the uncalled officer’s testimony would have been cumulative (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424 ; *515 People v Tate, 199 AD2d 291 ; People v Morris, 168 AD2d 464 ). Rosenblatt, J.
Cited 5 timesPublished113 A.D.2d 893 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 23, 1985
supra, at p 210 ; United States v Smith, 643 F2d 942, 944-945, cert denied 454 US 875 ). … J., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Cited 6 timesPublished169 A.D.2d 702 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 14, 1991
However, this transaction was barred by tbe Statute of Frauds contained in UCC 8-319 (a) (see, Gross v Vogel, 81 AD2d 576 ), and not subject to any of the exceptions therein. … Inasmuch as none of these writings is signed by the party to be charged, this contention is unavailing (see, Fox Co. v Kaufman Org., 74 NY2d 136 ; Crabtree v Arden Sales Corp., 305 NY 48 ). Bracken, J.
Cited 6 timesPublished186 A.D.2d 43 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 17, 1992
Petitioner left the scene of an accident and refused to take a breathalyzer test when ordered to do so by a superior officer (see, Matter of Holder v Sielaff, 184 AD2d 228 ; Thomas v City of New York, 169 AD2d 496 ; see also … , Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567 , lv denied 78 NY2d 855 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna