Case law

Connell v. Town Board of Wilmington

67 N.Y.2d 896 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1986

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the proceeding is untimely (CPLR 217; Press v County … of Monroe, 50 NY2d 695 ; Solnick v Whalen, 49 NY2d 224, 229-230 ).

Brown v. New York State Teachers Retirement System

19 N.Y.2d 779 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

Byrnes v. Board of Elections

307 N.Y. 816 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1954

Board of Higher Education v. Carter

14 N.Y.2d 138 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1964

Its administration of the city colleges is a State function and the board itself is a State agency. (Metzger v. Swift, 258 N. Y. 440 ; Nelson v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y., 263 App. Div. 144 , affd. 288 N. … (United States v.

Waybro Corp. v. Board of Estimate

67 N.Y.2d 349 · New York Court of Appeals · May 8, 1986

Indeed, we held as much, although in a different context, in Wein v Beame ( 43 NY2d 326 ). … And the Legislature had the authority to do so because, to paraphrase what we said in Floyd v New York State Urban Dev.

Brown & Bigelow v. REMEMBRANCE ADVER. PRODS., INC.

304 N.Y. 909 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1953

304 N.Y. 909 (1953) Brown & Bigelow, Appellant, v. Remembrance Advertising Products, Inc., et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued November 18, 1952. Decided January 15, 1953 Joe E.

WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning Board

79 N.Y.2d 373 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

Board of Appeals, 30 NY2d 238, 243 ; RPM Motors v Gulotta, supra). … Board of Appeals, 30 NY2d 238, 245 , supra; Matter of Veysey v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 154 AD2d 819 , lv denied 75 NY2d 708 ; Syracuse Bros. v Darcy, 127 AD2d 588 ).

Baskin v. Zoning Board of Appeals

40 N.Y.2d 942 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1976

Order reversed, with costs, petition dismissed and the determination of the zoning board of appeals confirmed on the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice J. Irwin Shapiro at the Appellate Division ( 48 AD2d 667 ).

Russell v. Board of Elections

45 N.Y.2d 800 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1978

Section 6-132 is such a provision; its unambiguous language is therefore controlling (Matter of Dyte v Lawley, 31 Misc 2d 182, 184 , affd 14 AD2d 827 ).

Williamson v. Board of Education

40 N.Y.2d 979 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1976

Cornelia v. Board of Education

29 N.Y.2d 586 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1971

Matter of Brown-Lipe Gear Co. v. Ferris

275 N.Y. 418 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1937

We agree with the Appellate Division that the challenged statute (L. 1935, ch. 449) attempts to transfer to a board to be appointed by State officers essential functions theretofore belonging to the Assessors of the city … X, § 2; People v. Raymond, 37 N. Y. 428 ; People ex rel. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 174 N. Y. 417 . See Prescott v. Ferris, 251 App. Div. 113 .) We pass on no other issue.

Board of Education v. Allen

6 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1959

Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

73 N.Y.2d 734 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1988

Talbot v. Thomas C. Brown Company, Inc.

263 N.Y. 597 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1933

McFerran v. Board of Education

45 N.Y.2d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1978

That prior action fully embraced those claims which petitioner now seeks to litigate in the courts of this State and settled principles of res judicata bar petitioner from raising those matters here (Israel v Wood Dolson … Co., 1 NY2d 116, 118 ; Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 NY 304, 306-307 ; Stoner v Culligan, Inc., 32 AD2d 170, 171-172 ).

Serota Brown Court II, LLC v. Town of Hempstead

14 N.Y.3d 768 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 2010

Appeal by the Town of Hempstead, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, and the Department of Buildings of the Town of Hempstead, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that … Appeal by the Town Board of the Town of Hempstead, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied its motion to intervene, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte

Fiore v. Zoning Board of Appeals

21 N.Y.2d 393 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1968

With this rule in mind in this case the Zoning Board of Appeals in essence has found ‘ ‘ that the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood (Matter of Otto v. … It is axiomatic that the court will not substitute its judgment for that of the board or set it aside unless it clearly appears to be arbitrary or contrary to law. (People ex rel. Hudson-Harlem Co. v. Walker, 282 N.

State Board of Pharmacy v. . Matthews

197 N.Y. 353 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1910

In People v. Abraham ( 16 App. … In State v. Forcier (65 N.

King v. Board of Regents

8 N.Y.2d 863 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1960