Case law

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board

9 N.Y.3d 897 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board

9 N.Y.3d 898 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

Motion by Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.

Pruzan v. Board of Education

9 N.Y.2d 793 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1961

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board

9 N.Y.3d 897 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board

9 N.Y.3d 898 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

Motion by Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.

Spencer v. Board of Education

31 N.Y.2d 810 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1972

Gibson v. Board of Education

45 N.Y.2d 884 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1978

Matter of Harris v Mechanicville Cent. School Dist., 45 NY2d 279 ). Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Wilcox v. Zoning Board of Appeals

17 N.Y.2d 249 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1966

the requirements of the leading use variance case (Matter of Otto v. … Feriola, 23 A D 2d 498, mot. for lv. to app. den. 16 N Y 2d 482; Matter of Satin v.

Fisher v. Board of Education

8 N.Y.3d 905 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2007

Timmerman v. Board of Education

298 N.Y. 908 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1949

Gross v. Board of Education

78 N.Y.2d 13 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1991

Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 456, 462 [addressing Education Law § 2585, the counterpart to § 2510]; Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., supra, at 278; Matter of Young v Board of Educ., supra, at 34). … Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., 35 NY2d 272, 281 , supra).

Lavine v. United Paper Board Company

243 N.Y. 631 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1926

Brown v. . the Cattaraugus County Mutual Insurance Company

18 N.Y. 385 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1858

The case of Jennings v. The Chenango County Mutual Insurance Company (2 Denio, 75), and the cases there cited, show that the evidence could not be received for any such purpose. The case of Kennedy v. The St.

Linton v. Board of Education

47 N.Y.2d 726 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1979

; Matter of Kobylski v Board of Educ., 33 AD2d 603 ). … ., 34 NY2d 222 ; see, also, Matter of Amos v Board of Educ., supra).

Pruzan v. Board of Education

9 N.Y.2d 911 · New York Court of Appeals · May 18, 1961

Brown v. . the Cayuga and Susquehanna Railroad Co.

12 N.Y. 486 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1855

The case of Lawrence v. The Great Northern Railway Co . (16 Ad. El . 643), is precisely in point. … See also Rochester White Lead Co . v. City of Rochester (3 Comst., 463), and Radcliff v. Mayor of Brooklyn (4 Comst., 195). The judgment should be affirmed.

Pilch v. Board of Education

8 N.Y.3d 828 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2007

Hurowitz v. Board of Elections

53 N.Y.2d 531 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1981

(Cass v. Dillon, 2 Ohio, N. S., 607; and see, per Walworth, Ch., in The People v. Mayor, etc., 25 Wend, 9-13; per Denio, Ch. J., in The People v. Draper, 15 N. Y., 532 -537.) ” (People ex rel. … (People v Purdy, 154 NY 439, 442 .) In this case, the nature of the Judge’s candidacy could have the effect of aborting the election process.

Ohman v. Board of Education

301 N.Y. 662 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1950

Brown v. . the New York Central R.R. Co.

44 N.Y. 79 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1870