Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • Brown v. J.P. Morgan Co., Incorporated

    295 N.Y. 867 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1946

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Nyquist

    57 N.Y.2d 27 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1982

    It would normally be inappropriate, therefore, for the courts to intrude upon such decision-making (see Matter of Board of Educ. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 535 , 538; Matter of Anderson v Krupsak, 40 NY2d 397, 402-403 ; … James v Board of Educ., 42 NY2d 357 ).

    Cited 103 timesPublished
  • Nicholson v. Board of Education

    36 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1975

    This is derived from the general rule that a municipality is under a duty to maintain its park and playground facilities in a reasonably safe condition (see Caldwell v Village of Is. … The invitation can be implied from the fact of actual notice to the board that children had for years been using the schoolyard as a playground, and the board’s failure tó make any effort to exclude them (see 42 NY Jur, Parks

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • New York State Public Employment Relations Board v. Board of Education

    39 N.Y.2d 86 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1976

    Co. v Bohlinger ( 308 NY 174 ) we held only that the Legislature could not wholly foreclose judicial review of administrative action. … In Matter of Foy v Schechter ( 1 NY2d 604 ) we permitted collateral attack on an administrative determination as to which, because of failure of performance of statutorily prescribed conditions precedent to agency action,

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1974

    Matter of Pell v. Board of Education. … (See Matter of Bernardini v. Port of N. Y. Auth., 34 N Y 2d 750.) Matter of Chilson v. Board of Education.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Allen

    6 N.Y.2d 127 · New York Court of Appeals · May 28, 1959

    The comment has also been made that “ Such a policy assures determinations by a person conversant with school problems ” (Matter of Nestler v. Board of Examiners, 192 Misc. 663, 665 ). … (Matter of Ross v. Wilson, 308 N. Y. 605, 608 , emphasis supplied; Matter of Levitch v. Board of Educ., 243 N. Y. 373, 375 .)

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Stetson v. . Board of Education

    218 N.Y. 301 · New York Court of Appeals · May 30, 1916

    Reynolds v. Common Council of Buffalo, 140 N. Y. 300 ; State ex rel. Hugg v. Camden, 39 N. J. L. 620; Binder v. Langhorst, 234 Ill. 583 ; People ex rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401 .) … The case of Steinson v. Board of Education of the City of New York ( 165 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Board of Elections

    53 N.Y.2d 515 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1981

    The referee, relying upon the substantial compliance concept of Matter of Rosen v McNab ( 25 NY2d 798 ) and the holding in Matter of McManus v De Sapio ( 5 NY2d 773 ), recommended validation of the petition. … which the election was to be held *518 was wholly within a single assembly district and the witness had been advised by Board of Elections personnel that the assembly district number could be omitted.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Syquia v. Board of Education

    80 N.Y.2d 531 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1992

    v New York City Hons. … Clement, 33 NY2d 386 ; Matter of Soucy v Board of Educ., 41 AD2d 984 , appeal dismissed 33 NY2d 653 ; see, Matter of Heller v Chu, 111 AD2d 1007, 1008-1009 , supra).

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Board of Education

    49 N.Y.2d 121 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1979

    Assn. v Board of Educ., 39 NY2d 111, 116 ; Matter of Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Bd. v Board of Educ., 23 NY2d 483, 485 ).” ( 47 NY2d, at p 444 .) … (Donohue v Copiague Union Free School Dist., 47 NY2d 440, 444 , supra; James v Board of Educ., 42 NY2d 357, 366 .)

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. . Order of Foresters

    176 N.Y. 132 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1903

    It is true that the member may be reinstated when the default has ceased, but not unless he is able to present a certificate of good health or to pass the medical board. … (Sternaman v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 170 N. Y. 13 .)

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Brown v. . Green

    56 N.Y. 476 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1874

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Short v. Board of Managers

    57 N.Y.2d 399 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1982

    Chrysler Corp. v Brown, 441 US 281 ). … disclosure of information of a personal nature when disclosure would result in economic or personal hardship to the subject party and such information is not relevant to the work of the agency requesting or maintaining it; or “v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Ciaccia v. Board of Education.

    271 N.Y. 336 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1936

    In Hurley v. Board of Education of City of New York ( 270 N. Y. 275 ) we decided in March of this year that section 871-b of the Education Law (Cons. … Laws, ch. 16), which extended the eligible fists in force May 15, 1932, for four years, was violative of section 6 of article V of the State Constitution and void.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Wahrman v. . Board of Education

    187 N.Y. 331 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1907

    In Donovan v. Board of Education of the City of New York ( 85 N. … And then again, in Donovan v. McAlpin ( 85 N.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Aulisi

    46 N.Y.2d 731 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1978

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Young v. Board of Trustees

    89 N.Y.2d 846 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1996

    Save the Pine Bush v City of Albany, supra, 70 NY2d, at 203). … Board of Educ., 188 AD2d 192 ).

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Urowsky v. Board of Regents

    38 N.Y.2d 364 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1975

    Matter of Bell v Board of Regents, 295 NY 101, 108 ). … The advertising prohibited by the Board of Regents is the type of commercial speech to which no First Amendment protection is afforded (Bigelow v Virginia, 421 US 809 ; Pittsburgh Press Co. v Human Relations Comm., 413 US

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Board of Education

    280 N.Y. 92 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1939

    (Peterson v. City of New York, 267 N. Y. 204 ; Curcio v. City of New York, 275 N. Y. 20 ; 24.) The judgments should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. Crane, Ch.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Board of Education

    64 N.Y.2d 856 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1985

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.