Case law

Palmer v. Board of Education

276 N.Y. 222 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1937

(Matter of Carow v. Board of Education, 272 N. Y. 341, 344 .) … Indeed, in Lorenz v. Board of Education ( 264 N.

Ortelere v. Teachers' Retirement Board

25 N.Y.2d 196 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1969

In Faber v. Sweet Style Mfg. Corp. ( 40 Misc 2d 212 ) Mr. … Y. 580 ; Schwartsberg v. Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 273 App. Div. 240 , affd. 298 N. Y. 741 ; Martin v. Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 70 N. Y. S. 2d 593).

Adamo v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

11 N.Y.3d 870 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2008

Bush v. . Board of Supervisors

159 N.Y. 212 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1899

(Taber v. Supervisors of Erie Co., 131 N. T. 432 ; PerJcins v. Inhabitants of Milford, 59 Maine, 315 ; Moulton v. Inhabitants of Raymond, 60 Maine, 121 ; Freeland v. Hastings, 92 Mass. 570 ; Mead v. … Inhabitants of Acton, 139 Mass. 341 ; Kelly v. Marshall, 69 Penn. St. 319 ; Ferguson v. Landram, 1 Bush [Ky.], 548.)

Board of Supervisors v. . Deyoe

77 N.Y. 219 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879

The prevention of a multiplicity of suits-as said-, by Chancellor Kent, in Brinkerhof v. Brown, (6 J. … (Badeau v. Rogers, 2 Paige, 209 ; Bedell v. Hoffman, id., 199, 2 Daniels’ Chy., 1562.) The case presents the elements which justify the interposition of a court of equity.

Clark v. Board of Education

304 N.Y. 488 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1952

final conclusion that the case should not have been submitted to the jury on the first ground, it erred in dismissing the complaint, since there was evidence to support the verdict *490 on the second ground (see Gardner v. … Inasmuch as we cannot know on which ground the jury arrived at its verdict, there must be a new trial (Phillipson v. Ninno, 233 N. Y. 223, 225-226 ; Elenkrieg v. Siebrecht, 238 N. Y. 254, 263 ).

Board of Education v. Barni

49 N.Y.2d 311 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1980

Wyandanch Teachers Assn., 48 NY2d 669 ; Matter of Board of Educ. v Roosevelt Teachers Assn., 47 NY2d 748 ). … with the powers, duties and responsibilities of the Board or the Superintendent of Schools under the Board’s rules or regulations, applicable law, and rules and regulations having the force and effect of law.” .

Board of Supervisors v. . Otis

62 N.Y. 88 · New York Court of Appeals · May 25, 1875

Watts v. … Johnson, in Board of Supervisors of Livingston County v. Norton, cited by the counsel for the respondents.

Irwin v. Board of Regents

27 N.Y.2d 292 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1970

(See Carlisle v. Bennett, 268 N. Y. 212 .) … (People v. Cull, 10 N Y 2d 123.)

Gimprich v. Board of Education

306 N.Y. 401 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1954

Y. 598 ; Matter of Small v. Moss, 277 N. Y. 501, 507 ). Strum v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 301 N. Y. 803 ) and Kramer v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 275 App. … Hammond v. Leonard, 74 N. Y. 443, 445 ; People ex rel. Peixotto v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 212 N. Y. 463 ; Matter of Holm v. Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 141 Misc. 194, 198 , affd. 234 App.

Cellular Telephone Co. v. Rosenberg

82 N.Y.2d 364 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1993

During the hearings, the Chairman of the Zoning Board questioned the authority of the Board to grant the variance, in light of this Court’s holding in Matter of Otto v Steinhilber ( 282 NY 71 ). … In Matter of Otto v Steinhilber, the Court articulated the factors that a zoning board must consider before finding unnecessary hardship warranting the grant of a use variance.

Board of Education v. Areman

41 N.Y.2d 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1977

Moreover, as referred to in Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ. ( 38 NY2d 897 ), section 3031 may lead to a *533 situation where a superintendent is called upon to justify and defend his decisions before the board. … Komyathy v Board of Educ., 75 Misc 2d 859, 868-869 ).

Town Board v. Sterngass

100 N.Y.2d 569 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2003

Venes v. Community School Board

43 N.Y.2d 520 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1978

Monaghan, 306 NY 312, 323-324 ; Matter of Sullivan v Board of Educ., 264 App Div 207 , affd without opn 289 NY 672 ; Matter of Siegel v Mangan, 258 App Div 448 , affd without opn 283 NY 557 ; see, also,- Matter of Irish Int … Such an employee has no property rights in his position, and may be dismissed for almost any reason, or for no reason at all (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892 ; Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 318 ).

Lawes v. Board of Education

16 N.Y.2d 302 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1965

A school is not liable for every thoughtless or careless act by which one pupil may injure another (Hoose v. Drumm, 281 N. Y. 54 , supra; Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 300 N. Y. 306 ; Wilber v. … (See, e.g., Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., supra, a thrown lead pencil; Wilber v. City of Binghamton, supra, a batted stone; May v. Board of Educ. Union Free School Dist. No. 1, 295 N.

Board of Supervisors v. . Ellis

59 N.Y. 620 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1875

It is claimed, however, that the board of supervisors in one year having audited and allowed them, the board of *Page 624 supervisors in a later year being the same body in law ( Suprs. of Chenango v. … The county had other agents through whom it acted, and it at times acted through the board as its agent. Boards of supervisors are classed as subordinate public agents. ( Hull v.

Gould v. Board of Education

81 N.Y.2d 446 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1993

probationary term” (Matter of Lindsey v Board of Educ., 72 AD2d 185, 186 ). … Motor Hire Corp. v New York Indem. Co., 255 NY 69, 73 ; see especially, Matter of Feinerman v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 48 NY2d 491, 497-498 ; Matter of Abramovich v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 450, 455 ).

Ricca v. Board of Education

47 N.Y.2d 385 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1979

in the affirmative by our decision in Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Oneida v Nyquist ( 45 NY2d 975 , revg on dissenting opn below 59 AD2d 76 ). … Board of Educ., 21 NY2d 455 ), although it may, of course, provide teachers with greater security than that mandated by statute, at least in the absence of any violation of public policy (see Matter of Schlosser v Board of

Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees

57 N.Y.2d 1010 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1982

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the Police Department of the City of New York should be reinstated. … New York State Employees’ Retirement System, 84 AD2d 902 , mot for lv to app den 55 NY2d 606 ; Matter of Panek v Regan, 81 AD2d 738 ).

Chainani v. Board of Education

87 N.Y.2d 370 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1995

Plaintiffs appeal the reversal as to the Board; Amboy and Acuti appeal the affirmance as to them. We now affirm. Bruce v Hasbrouck. … In Chainani v Board of Educ.: Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Board of Education as against appellants-respondents and respondents-appellants.