Case law

Brown v. State

44 N.Y. 1006 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1978

No costs are allowed because of excessive length of respondent’s brief (see Matter of Bianca v Frank, 43 NY2d 168, 174 ). Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Friends of Thayer Lake LLC v. Brown

27 N.Y.3d 1039 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 2016

Brown, 126 AD3d 22, 25 [3d Dept 2015]). … Ry Co. v State Tax Commn., 247 NY 9, 11-12 [1928]; People ex rel. Erie R.R. Co. v State Tax Commn., 266 App Div 452, 454 [3d Dept 1943]).

The People v. Marcus Brown

New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2023

No. 83 The People &c., Respondent, v. Marcus Brown, Appellant. Ava C. Page, for appellant. William H. Branigan, for respondent. … College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 476 US 747, 759 [1986], quoting Brown v Board of Education, 349 US 294, 300 [1955]).

Brown v. City of New York

47 N.Y.2d 927 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1979

Viewing the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Parvi v City of Kingston, 41 NY2d 553 ), we agree with the Appellate Division that she made out a prima facie case. … As to the cross appeal, the plaintiff having stipulated to the "reduction” of damages, her appeal does not lie and, accordingly, is dismissed (Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448 ).

People ex rel. Brown v. Duane

40 N.Y. St. Rep. 980 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1891

Brown v. . Metropolitan Street Railway Company

171 N.Y. 699 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1902

he People v. George Brown

New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 2021

The Board is explicitly permitted to consider whether the individual in question has demonstrated remorse and insight into the crime (Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 478 [2000]). As Mr. … Brown argues, “an expression of remorse at a sentencing proceeding may be more influential than similar statements made before the Parole Board itself, because they evince an inmate’s consistent” admission of guilt.

People Ex Rel. Brown v. Conway

8 N.Y.3d 842 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2007

Coates v. Planning Board

58 N.Y.2d 800 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1983

Consequently, petitioners cannot be heard to complain that the planning board, in imposing those fees, acted arbitrarily or capriciously. (Suffolk County Bldrs. … Assn. v County of Suffolk, 46 NY2d 613 ; Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of North Shore v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn Harbor, 40 NY2d 158 .)

People Ex Rel. Brown v. . Greene

184 N.Y. 565 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1906

Manouel v. Board of Assessors

25 N.Y.3d 46 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2015

Therefore, the Manouels failed to comply with the clear and unambiguous statutory requirement of RPTL 730 (1) (b) (i) that the owner occupy the premises (Matter of Manouel v Board of Assessors, 111 AD3d 735 [2d Dept 2013] … Board of Assessors ( 188 AD2d 471 [2d Dept 1992]).

AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY v. Brown

14 N.Y.3d 809 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2010

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, defendant Brown’s motion for summary judgment denied, plaintiffs … Defendant Brown failed to provide a valid excuse for his failure to use reasonable diligence in providing plaintiff insurer with notice of the underlying personal injury action.

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board

9 N.Y.3d 219 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2007

In May 2003 petitioners commenced Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast—the first of the two appeals before us—challenging the Board’s determination that a second SEIS was not required. … In Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast: Order reversed, etc. In Matter of Ingraham v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast: Order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. 1 .

Santer v. Board of Education

23 N.Y.3d 940 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 2014

North v. Board of Examiners

8 N.Y.3d 745 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 2007

Muniz, 74 NY2d 464 [1989]; People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586 [1984]). … People v Olah, 300 NY 96 [1949] [interpreting former Penal Law § 1941, a predecessor of Penal Law § 70.06]).

Brown v. City of New York

176 N.Y. 571 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1903

Brown v. Manufacturers Trust Company

278 N.Y. 733 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1938

Pecoraro v. Board of Appeals

2 N.Y.3d 608 · New York Court of Appeals · May 4, 2004

of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d at 308 ; Matter of Twin County Recycling Corp. v Yevoli, 90 NY2d 1000, 1002 [1997]; Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591 , 598 [1977]). … A determination of a zoning board should be sustained on judicial review if it has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d at 308 ; Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d

People v. Canal Board

10 N.Y. 390 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1874

Ames, in Greene v. Mumford (5 R. … (See Mott v. Pennsylvania, R. R. Co., 30 Penn. St. R., 9; Darby v. Wright, Comptroller, etc., 3 Blatch. C. C. R., 170; Attorney-General v. Compton, 1 Y. & C., 417; New London v. Brainard, 22 Conn., 553 ; Bigelow v.

Cohen v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

64 N.Y.2d 728 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1984

In 1982, the cooperative’s board decided that the maids’ rooms could be put to a more profitable use and sent letters to all tenant-stockholders stating that the board had *730 decided to assign shares to the maids’ rooms … Co. v 263 Ninth Ave. Realty, 88 AD2d 877 , affd 57 NY2d 1038 ).