Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
63 N.Y. 239 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1875
In conformity with this doctrine it was held in Brady v. The Mayor, etc. ( 20 N. … (Hoyt v. Thompson, 19 N. Y., 218 ; Hasbrouck v. Milwaukee, 21 Wis., 217 .)
Cited 31 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Martin v. . Brown
55 N.Y. 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1873
It was not collected out of its corporate property or by its direction; nor is it liable for the act either of the board of supervisors, or of the collector in levying or collecting it. ( Lorillard v. … The cases of Ross v. Curtis ( 31 N.Y., 606 ) and of Murdock v. Aikin (decided in this court in 1863, but not reported) are conclusive against the defendant upon the point in question. In Ross v.
Cited 25 timesPublished3 N.Y.3d 612 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2004
3 N.Y.3d 612 (2004) MATTER OF BROWN v. GOORD Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided November 30, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 N.Y.3d 606 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2004
3 N.Y.3d 606 (2004) BROWN v. ARCADY REALTY CORP. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided September 9, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Gottschalk v. . Brown
237 N.Y. 483 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1924
(Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran, 188 U. S. 691 ; People ex rel. Corkran v. Hyatt, 172 N. Y. 176 .) … (Hogan v. O’Neill, 255 U. S. 52, 56 .)
Cited 30 timesPublished60 N.Y.2d 893 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1983
reversal as “on the law,” inasmuch as the unpreserved error was reviewed by the Appellate Division, this court construes the reversal as an exercise of discretion which is beyond this court’s power to review (see Feinberg v … was no evidence at trial that the defendant, between the time of detention and the time of instituting the criminal proceeding against the plaintiff, had knowledge of some intervening fact exonerating plaintiff” (Feinberg v
Cited 35 timesPublished29 N.Y.3d 1141 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2017
sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division does not have the power to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question from an order granting a new trial (see CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]; Trezza v
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . Farmers' Loan Trust Co.
117 N.Y. 266 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1889
(Dodge v. Crandall, 30 N. Y. 304 .) It is the rule of evidence where one party or the other is seeking performance or-damages for non-performance.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Brown v. . Freisch
215 N.Y. 356 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1915
Brink v. Way, 179 N. Y. 174 ; Matter of Hearst v. Woelper, 183 N. Y. 274 .) … This court held that a recanvass of votes by the board of inspectors and a proclamation of the correct count could not be compelled by mandamus, citing People ex rel. Brink v. Way and Matter of Hearst v.
Cited 25 timesPublished60 N.Y.2d 897 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1983
Dowdy v Smith *899 ( 48 NY2d 477, 482 ), do not stand in sufficient relationship to apply the doctrine. Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Cited 29 timesPublishedCorrigan v. Board of Elections
30 N.Y.2d 603 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1972
Cited 4 timesPublishedNo opinion textTuscarora Club of Millbrook v. Brown
215 N.Y. 543 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1915
(Shattuck v. Bascom, 105 N. Y. 39 ; Odell v. Montross, 68 N. Y. 499 ; Carr v. Carr, 52 N. Y. 251 .) … (Leonard v. Clough, 133 N. Y. 292 .) The plaintiff was a subsequent purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration of the Mill brook stream, claiming under the deeds to and from Sarah A. Brown.
Cited 17 timesPublished165 N.Y. 216 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1901
Bank v. Carll, 55 N. Y. 440 ; White v. Ambler, 8 N. Y. 170 ; Bank of Monroe v. Gul *222 ver, 2 Hill, 531 ; Brewster v. Doane, 2 Hill, 537 .) … (Hotopp v. Huber, 160 N. Y. 524 ; Flour City Nat. Bank v. Widener, 163 N. Y. 276 .)
Cited 17 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Martin v. Brown
10 N.Y. 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1873
It was not collected out of its corporate property or by its direction; nor is it liable for the act either of the board of supervisors, or of the collector in levying or collecting it. (Lorillard v. … (McCullough v. Mayor, etc., of Brooklyn, 23 Wend., 459 ; The People v. Mead, 24 N. Y., 114 .)
Cited 6 timesPublished24 N.Y.3d 1048 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2014
We cannot say that “the penalty of [termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience” (Ma tter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.
Cited 65 timesPublishedBrown v. . Keeney Settlement Cheese Asso.
59 N.Y. 242 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1874
It has been frequently decided, and very recently in the case of Pfohl v. … ordinary jurisdiction, may, upon the application of a mortgagee, restrain any waste of the mortgaged premises, which would impair the security and imperil the collection of the mortgage debt. (2 Story Eq., § 913; Brady v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Maxian v. Brown
77 N.Y.2d 422 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1991
Justice Soloff reviewed the Second Circuit’s decision in Williams v Ward (845 F2d 374 [2d Cir 1988], cert denied 488 US 1020 ) which held that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was not violated when arrestees … The Legislature did not set rigid temporal limits in enacting CPL 140.20 (1); nor do we in construing it (see, Matter of Ayers v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 346 ).
Cited 38 timesPublishedPeople, Ex Rel. Brush v. . Brown
103 N.Y. 684 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1886
Cited 9 timesPublishedBrown v. v & R Advertising, Inc.
67 N.Y.2d 772 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1986
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrown v. Steamship Terminal Operating Corp.
267 N.Y. 83 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1935
Brown:, was employed by R, Markey & Sons, of New York, weighers of sugar. His work took him on the docks. … The case was submitted to the jury under a practice which we have criticized in Bergman v. Scottish Union & National Ins. Co. ( 264 N. Y. 205 ). (See, however, Civ. Prac. Act, § 459, as amd. by Laws of 1934, ch. 522.)
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna