Case law

Standen v. . Brown

152 N.Y. 128 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

People v. Brown

29 N.Y.3d 1124 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2017

People v. Brown

28 N.Y.3d 1123 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2016

Brown v. . Leach

228 N.Y. 612 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1920

People v. Brown

28 N.Y.3d 927 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2016

Rockwell v. . Brown

54 N.Y. 210 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1873

The plaintiff, in order to make out a link in the chain of his title, having shown the fee to be vested in one Isaac V. … Adjudications involving the principle are numerous. ( Forrest v. Havens, 38 N.Y. 471 ; Onderdonk v. Voorhis, 36 N.Y., 358 ; Bailey v. Burton, 8 Wend., 339 ; Games v. Stiles, 14 Peters, 322 .)

People v. Brown

87 N.Y.2d 950 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1996

properly instructed the jury on the legal principle that the crime of burglary is committed when a person knowingly and unlawfully enters a building with the contemporaneous intent to commit a crime therein (see, People v … Accordingly, the burglary conviction should be vacated, and a new trial held on that count (see, People v Gaines, 74 NY2d 358, 363 , supra).

People v. Brown

20 N.Y.2d 801 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1967

Brown v. Saratoga Railroad

18 N.Y. 495 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1859

Di Maggio v. Brown

19 N.Y.2d 283 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

In Pruzan v. Board of Educ. (9 N Y 2d 911 [1961]) the constitutionality of Condon-Wadlin was at least impliedly asserted. … Ct., 1966]; see also Matter of Donaldson v. Brown, 24 A D 2d 714 [1st Dept., 1965].)

Brown v. Du Frey

1 N.Y.2d 190 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1956

Brown changed the spelling of her last name to “ Browne.” In 1924 plaintiff married one Myra Brown. At the time of the commencement of this action they were living together at No. 101 Decatur Street, Brooklyn, New York. … Y. 146 ; Berner v. Board of Educ., 286 N. Y. 174 ; Leonard v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 297 N. Y. 103 ; McCabe v. Cohen, 294 N. Y. 522 ; Commercial Cas. Ins. Co. v. Roman, 269 N. Y. 451 ; Graves v. Rudman, 235 App.

Brown v. . Crooke

4 N.Y. 51 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1850

It is true, that the case under consideration is distinguished from Deraismes v. The Merchants Mutual Ins. … (Verpb/nk v. The Mercaniile Ins. Co. 2 Paige, 438 ; 2 B. ¡S. 464, § 41. This case can not be distinguished in principle from the case referred to, and its decision must be governed by the decision made in that.

Brown v. Aran

89 N.Y.2d 910 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1996

Zolezzi v. Bruce-Brown

243 N.Y. 490 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1926

(Jennings v. Van Schaick, 108 N. Y. 530 .) … (Timlin v. Standard Oil Co., 126 N. Y. 514 ; Wilks v. New York Telephone Co., 243 N. Y. 351 .)

De Remer v. . Brown

165 N.Y. 410 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1901

De Remer & Co. as parties of the first part, and Willard Brown and Charles W. Wells, doing business under the firm name of Brown & Wells, as parties of the second part. … (Mills v. Hunt, 17 Wend. 333 ; Newman v. Greeff, 101 N. Y. 663 ; Kernochan v. Murray, 111 N. Y. 306 ; Argersinger v. Macnaughton, 114 N. Y. 535 ; Welch v. Goodwin, 123 Mass. 71 ; Worthington v.

Fernschild v. Brown

280 N.Y. 782 · New York Court of Appeals · May 17, 1939

Williams v. Brown

4 Abb. Ct. App. 607 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1866

. * Hunt v. O’Connor and others, not reported; Rose v. Black, not reported. … See also, Beckwith v. The Union Bank, 9 N. Y. 211. The judgment should be affirmed. All the judges concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See Fish v. Jacobsohn, vol. 2, p. 132, of this series; Allen v. Brown, 44 N.

Brown v. Welsbach Corp.

301 N.Y. 202 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1950

In that case, however, it was pointed out that if a defective board had been installed the applicable rule might be different. … Y. 64, 69 ; Irvine v. Wood, 51 N. Y. 224, 228 ; Charlock v. Freel, 125 N. Y. 357 ; Wilks v. New York Tel. Co., 243 N. Y. 351 ; Wilks v. Federal Tel. & Tel. Co., 248 N. Y. 618 [same case]; Wenzel v. Duncan, 261 App.

McKie v. . Brown

199 N.Y. 71 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1910

Brown is clearly void. An assessment of land for taxation in the name of the “estate” of a person, without any qualifying or explanatory descrq tion, is void on its face. (Matter of McCue v. … Y. 235 ; Cromwell v. MacLean, 123 N. Y. 474 ; Trowbridge v. Horan, 78 N. Y. 439 ; Cruger v. Dough *75 erty, 43 N. Y. 107 .)

Brown v. Leigh

12 Abb. Pr. 193 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1872

Hollister *198 v. Livingston ( 9 How. Pr., 140 ; Field v. Morse, 8 Id., 47; Diens v. Cary, 3 Id., 377), are all of this class. In other cases (Mason v. Whitley, 1 Abb. Pr., 85 ; S. C., 4 Duer, 611 ; Prindle v. … Co. v. Tibbits, 11 Id., 168), and others, it has been held that a new cause of action or defense might be set up.