Case law

Brown v. . Brown

41 N.Y. 507 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1869

Brown, should be charged with the payment of all the debts of the testator. 2d. … The case of Hoes v. Van Hoesen (1 Comst., 120), is in harmony with this view.

Franklin v. Krause

32 N.Y.2d 234 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1973

In Franklin v. … But in Abate v. Mundt, 403 U.

Brown v. Brown

70 N.Y.2d 763 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1987

Brown v. Brown

75 N.Y.2d 797 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1990

Brown v. Brown

67 N.Y.2d 937 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1986

Brown v. Brown

300 N.Y. 714 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1950

Brown v. Brown

70 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1895

Brown v. . Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1851

Although commenced before, it was tried and decided in the supreme court after the enactment of the code, and to such a case this court has decided that the code applies. ( Grover v. Coon, 1 Comst . 536.)

Brown v. . Brown

146 N.Y. 385 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1895

City Council of Watervliet v. Town Board of Colonie

3 N.Y.3d 508 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004

SEQRA’s primary purpose “is to inject environmental considerations directly into governmental decision making” (Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d 674, 679 [1988]). … Perales, 86 NY2d 361, 367 [1995]; Matter of Astoria Generating Co. v General Counsel of N.Y.

Brown & Brown v. Theresa A. Johnson

25 N.Y.3d 364 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2015

. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 92 Brown & Brown, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Theresa A. Johnson, et al., Respondents. (AD No. … Plaintiff Brown & Brown, Inc. (BBI) is a Florida corporation. Its New York subsidiary, plaintiff Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (BBNY), is licensed to handle insurance in New York.

People v. Brown

28 N.Y.3d 392 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2016

People v Brown In November 2006, defendant James Brown was charged with two counts of robbery in the first degree, and subsequently was indicted on those charges. … People v Brown In Brown, the People were not ready for trial on July 9, 2007 and requested an adjournment to July 23, 2007. The court adjourned the case to August 8, 2007.

People v. Brown

42 N.Y.3d 270 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 02765 ) People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 02765 [ 42 NY3d 270 ] May 21, 2024 Troutman, J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … As corrected through Wednesday, November 6, 2024 [*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Brown, Appellant.

People v. Brown

21 N.Y.3d 739 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2013

Bradford and defendant Thomas Brown, who had also been at the club, began arguing. … By contrast, in the earlier case of People v Salcedo ( 92 NY2d 1019, 1021 [1998]), we determined that continuous possession of the weapon was not determinative.

People v. Brown

29 N.Y.3d 914 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2017

Brown v. Bawa

29 N.Y.3d 903 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2017

Brown v. State

28 N.Y.3d 913 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 2017

People v. Brown

14 N.Y.3d 113 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 2010

It is well settled that, in order to be valid and enforceable, a guilty plea must be entered voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently (see People v Hill, 9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007]). … A guilty plea is voluntary only if it represents an informed choice freely made by defendant among other valid alternatives (see North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25, 31 [1970]; People v Grant, 61 AD3d 177, 182 [2d Dept 2009

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.

30 N.Y.2d 122 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1972

[Bd. of Educ.], 34 A D 2d 351, 355, supra; see, also, Rayburn v. Board of Educ., 71 LRRM 2177, 2178 [Mich. Cir. Ct.].) … (See Kranker v. Levitt, 30 N Y 2d 574.)

People v. Brown

13 N.Y.3d 332 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2009

Because the report is “nontestimonial,” we hold that its admission did not constitute a Crawford violation (see Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]; Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 557 US —, 129 S Ct 2527 [2009]). … The People cited to People v Cratsley ( 86 NY2d 81 [1995]) and People v Kennedy ( 68 NY2d 569 [1986]), arguing that a business record can be introduced by a person who is not a custodian of records, provided that the other