Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

3.23s

  • Schulz v. New York State Board of Elections

    86 N.Y.2d 848 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1995

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • County of Erie v. Public Employment Relations Board

    12 N.Y.3d 72 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2009

    Although such policy decisions are exempt from bargaining, the impact of those decisions is not (see West Irondequoit Teachers Assn., 35 NY2d at 51; see also Matter of Levitt v Board of Collective Bargaining of City of N.Y … School Dist. v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 83 NY2d 315 , 320 [1994], citing Matter of Rosen v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 72 NY2d 42, 47-48 [1988]).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • American Cyanamid Co. v. Board of Assessors

    91 N.Y.2d 984 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Soto v. New York State Board of Parole

    66 N.Y.2d 817 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1985

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. Towns of Gates Chili, Monroe Cty.

    292 N.Y. 663 · New York Court of Appeals · May 18, 1944

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Van Allen v. New York State Board of Elections

    22 N.Y.3d 1055 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

    23 N.Y.2d 202 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1968

    The board correctly argues that neither a formal hiring agreement nor the payment of money is required for a finding that there is an employment and that wages have been paid (Matter of Hall v. Salvation Army, 261 N. … Y. 110 ; Matter of Bernstein v. Beth Israel Hosp., 236 N. Y. 268 ; Matter of Boehm v. Sokol Hall Holding Corp., 274 App. Div. 954 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lewin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    57 N.Y.2d 760 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1982

    The determination of the board is neither arbitrary nor capricious nor without rational basis. Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lake Anne Realty Corp. v. Planning Board

    85 N.Y.2d 1022 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vlachos v. New York City Loft Board

    70 N.Y.2d 769 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1987

    The Loft Board’s determination that the second, third and fourth floors of petitioners’ building had been residentially occupied during the "window” period, and thus were residential units covered by the Loft Law (Multiple … There is no requirement for Loft Law coverage that residentially occupied units be the primary residences of their tenants (see, Matter of BOR Realty Corp. v New York City Loft Bd., 70 NY2d 720 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • King Service, Inc. v. Town Board

    75 N.Y.2d 953 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Eckerson v. Board of Education

    193 N.Y. 601 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1908

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • American Cyanamid Co. v. Board of Assessors

    93 N.Y.2d 832 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1999

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • David v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    59 N.Y.2d 714 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1983

    The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the petition dismissed and the order of the Conciliation and Appeals Board reinstated. … On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, petition dismissed and order of the board reinstated in a memorandum.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Brownell v. Board of Assessors

    193 N.Y. 248 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1908

    The petition appears to have been received by the common council and referred to the board of assessors for the purpose of having that board determine whether the petition was signed by a majority of the resident owners of … The questions referred to the board of assessors, as we have seen, were three in number: *254 1.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Linfield v. Board of Higher Education

    47 N.Y.2d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gaiter v. City of Buffalo Board of Education

    25 N.Y.3d 1036 · New York Court of Appeals · May 14, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Hutschnecker v. Board of Regents, University

    295 N.Y. 558 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1945

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Casse v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

    69 N.Y.2d 862 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Ford v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

    22 N.Y.3d 947 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.