Case law

Huntington Coach Corp. v. Board of Education

40 N.Y.2d 892 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1976

Corp. v IPA Land Development Corp. ( 38 NY2d 516, 521-522 ; see, also, Cyclopedia, New York Law of Damages, vol 1, § 87, p 72).

Board of Excise of Ont. Co. v. . Garlinghouse

45 N.Y. 249 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1871

The principal purpose of the act of 1810, seems to have been to change the excise boards from county boards to town, village and city boards, so that each locality would be assured of that personal knowledge, supervision … The new boards having express authority to sue for penalties, it follows that the old boards have not.

People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Board of Supervisors

139 N.Y. 524 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1893

The relator, therefore, applied to a Special Term of the Supreme Court for a peremptory mandamus, requiring the board to recognize him as a supervisor of the city of Yonkers, and permit him to act as a member of the board … is “ providing for election of members of board of supervisors.”

Matter of Savidis v. Board of Educ.

2 N.Y.3d 702 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2004

2 N.Y.3d 702 (2004) MATTER OF SAVIDIS v. BOARD OF EDUC. RETIREMENT SYS. FOR CITY OF N.Y. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 30, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Matter of Ragsdale v. Board of Education

282 N.Y. 323 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1940

Petitioner is an employee of the Board of Education of the city of New York which fixed his salary under the authority provided in sections 883 and 887 of the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16). … The right of the Board so to do was exclusive. The Board of Education is not a department of the city of New York (Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170, 173 ).

Vasquez v. New York State Board of Parole

58 N.Y.2d 981 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1983

On October 15,1979 the board declared petitioner delinquent as of December 11,1978 and it requested that the Connecticut authorities return petitioner to New York when he was available. … Gonzales v Dalsheim ( 52 NY2d 9 ) on that basis. Our *983 holding in Gonzales should be applied to this case.

SMC Employers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

39 N.Y.2d 960 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1976

Judgment reversed, with costs, and determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated (Matter of But *962 terly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ).

Board of Education v. West Babylon Teachers Ass'n

52 N.Y.2d 1002 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1981

It is for the arbitrator to interpret the substantive *1004 provisions of the contract (Board of Educ. v Barni, 49 NY 2d 311 ; Matter of Wyandanch Union Free School Dist. v Wyandanch Teachers Assn., 48 NY2d 669 ).

Lai Chun Chan Jin v. Board of Estimate

62 N.Y.2d 900 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1984

Pursuant to its provisions zoning changes are preceded by public hearings, before the appropriate community board, before the CPC and before the Board of Estimate (City Charter, § 197-c, subds c, e, f). … Town of Manlius, 28 NY2d 108 ; Udell v Haas, 21 NY2d 463 ).

Haight v. . Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County

107 N.Y. 677 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1887

United Liverpool Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Education

52 N.Y.2d 1038 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1981

Cohoes Teachers Assn., supra; Board of Educ. v Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers, 39 NY2d 167 ). … [Brown], 49 NY2d 935, 936 ).

National Board of Marine Underwriters v. National Bank

146 N.Y. 64 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1895

(Story v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 6 N. Y. 85 ; Goodsell v. W. U. Tel. Co., 109 id. 147 .) … If the judgment must be reversed for error, the error necessarily reverses the entire judgment and the new trial must be as to the entire claim. ( Wolstenholme v. Wolstenholme Co., 64 N. Y. 272 .)

People ex rel. Ransom v. Board of Supervisors

78 N.Y. 622 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1879

OTR Media Group v. Board of Stds. & Appeals

28 N.Y.3d 912 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2017

550 Halstead Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

1 N.Y.3d 561 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2003

Accordingly, municipalities may adopt measures regulating nonconforming uses and may, in a reasonable fashion, eliminate them (see Matter of Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v Weise, 51 NY2d 278, 287 [1980]). … The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town/Village of Harrison (ZBA) determined that when petitioner replaced its wooden pallet storage system with steel-frame storage racks, it impermissibly expanded or extended its nonconforming

Claim of Brown v. Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc.

26 N.Y.2d 735 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1970

Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

290 N.Y. 818 · New York Court of Appeals · May 27, 1943

Weydman Electric, Inc. v. Joint Schools Construction Board

28 N.Y.3d 1024 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2016

Tenlan Realty Corp. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

276 N.Y. 594 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1937

Pyramid Crossgates Co. v. Board of Assessors

98 N.Y.2d 634 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2002