Case law

Board of Education v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Ass'n

46 N.Y.2d 553 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1979

Board of Educ., 33 NY2d 229 ). … In all other cases "it is the declared policy of this State to encourage 'public employers and * * * employee organizations to agree upon procedures for resolving disputes’ ” (Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington

Board of Education v. Yonkers Federation of Teachers

46 N.Y.2d 727 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1978

Even assuming that the terms of the agreement mandated that the award be advisory only (but see Matter of Yonkers Federation of Teachers v Board of Educ., 44 NY2d 752 ; Matter of Yonkers Federation of Teachers [Board of Educ … Forum v City of Binghamton, 44 NY2d 23 , 28-29; Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 582-583 ).

Claim of Mullins v. State Board of Parole

35 N.Y.2d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1975

Board of Water Com. of Cohoes v. . Lansing

45 N.Y. 19 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1871

People Ex Rel. Moss v. Board of Supervisors

221 N.Y. 367 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1917

The board of supervisors of Oneida county determined in May, 1916, that claims of the relators upon the county were not legal and should not be audited. … Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225 ; City of Cairo v. Bross, 99 Ill. 521 .) The appeal should be dismissed, with costs. Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed

Sutton Area Community v. Board of Estimate

78 N.Y.2d 945 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1991

The record, viewed as a whole, reveals that the Board was fully informed of all pertinent environmental issues, including those dealing with the sewage treatment plant change, and considered these numerous factors before … Accordingly, the "hard look” standard of judicial review is satisfied and the determination must be confirmed (see, Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561 ).

People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Board of Supervisors

139 N.Y. 524 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1893

The relator, therefore, applied to a Special Term of the Supreme Court for a peremptory mandamus, requiring the board to recognize him as a supervisor of the city of Yonkers, and permit him to act as a member of the board … is “ providing for election of members of board of supervisors.”

Mayor & Board of Trustees of Mount Kisco v. Supervisor & Town Board of Bedford

42 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1977

the appeal petitioners contended that no appeal as of right lay to the Court of Appeals because the dissent at the Appellate Division was not on a question of law, citing Matter of City Council of City of Mechanicville v

Sierra Construction Co. v. Board of Appeals

12 N.Y.2d 79 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1962

[a]) petitioner appeals from a unanimous affirmance by Appellate Division, Fourth Department, of a Special Term order confirming a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greece, Monroe County. … S. 603 , supra; Matter of Olsen v. Simkins, 204 Misc. 412, 414 ; Boudreau v. Albanese, 36 Misc 2d 1051 ; Matter of Gitlin v. Rowledge, 36 Misc 2d 933 ; City of Little Rock v. Southwest Bldrs., 224 Ark. 871 ; Alker v.

SMC Employers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

39 N.Y.2d 960 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1976

Judgment reversed, with costs, and determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated (Matter of But *962 terly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ).

The People v. . the Board of Metropolitan Police

26 N.Y. 316 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1863

This statute brought into being a new system, all of whose officers were then first introduced into the administration of the authority of the State government. ( People v. Draper, 15 N.Y., 532 .) … But the relator by his conduct clearly vacated the office, and the Board of Police could lawfully fill his place.

People Ex Rel. Eckerson v. Board of Trustees

151 N.Y. 75 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1896

(House v. City of Rochester, 15 Barb. 517 ; Menges v. City of Albany, 56 N. Y. 374 ; Hilton v. Bender, 69 N. Y. 75, 86 .) … Lower v. Donovan, 135 N. Y. 76, 79 ; Heishon v. Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co., 77 N. Y. 278 ; Matter of Roberts, 70 N. Y. 5 .)

Beebe v. . Board of Supervisors of Sullivan County

142 N.Y. 631 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1894

People Ex Rel. Patterson v. Board of Education

295 N.Y. 313 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1946

The Board of Education again made no reply. … To that telegraphic communication the board made no reply.

Stammer v. Board of Regents of the University

287 N.Y. 359 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1942

She presented two charges, both of which were sustained, with all their accompanying specifications, by the Committee on Grievances and by the Board of Regents. … (Ferrell v. State, 68 Tex. Crim. Rep. 487.)

Inlet Homes Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

2 N.Y. 769 · New York Court of Appeals · May 4, 2004

Giving due deference to the broad discretion of zoning boards considering applications for area variances (see Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d 304, 308 [2002]), the denial by respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of petitioner’s application … The record supports the Board’s finding that the character of the neighborhood is overwhelmingly conforming to the zoning requirements and that a grant of the area variance would have an adverse effect on the surrounding

Matter of Ragsdale v. Board of Education

282 N.Y. 323 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1940

Petitioner is an employee of the Board of Education of the city of New York which fixed his salary under the authority provided in sections 883 and 887 of the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16). … The right of the Board so to do was exclusive. The Board of Education is not a department of the city of New York (Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170, 173 ).

Brummel v. Town of North Hempstead Town Board

29 N.Y.3d 1047 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2017

Huntington Coach Corp. v. Board of Education

40 N.Y.2d 892 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1976

Corp. v IPA Land Development Corp. ( 38 NY2d 516, 521-522 ; see, also, Cyclopedia, New York Law of Damages, vol 1, § 87, p 72).

Board of Excise of Ont. Co. v. . Garlinghouse

45 N.Y. 249 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1871

The principal purpose of the act of 1810, seems to have been to change the excise boards from county boards to town, village and city boards, so that each locality would be assured of that personal knowledge, supervision … The new boards having express authority to sue for penalties, it follows that the old boards have not.