Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.08s
Lindsay v. New York State Board of Parole
48 N.Y.2d 883 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1979
. - On the merits, we agree that the failure to hold a timely revocation hearing requires dismissal of the parole violation charges (Matter of Piersma v Henderson, 44 NY2d 982 ; People ex rel. … Walsh v Vincent, 40 NY2d 1049 ). That a parole eligibility hearing was eventually conducted is irrelevant.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCasse v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
70 N.Y.2d 589 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1987
of Commrs. v Merchant, 103 NY 143, 148 [Earl, J.]; see also, Matter of Sigety v Leventhal, 42 NY2d 953, 955 ; Usery v Turner Elkhorn Min. … v Barchi, supra, at 64; cf., Hubel v West Va.
Cited 22 timesPublishedTown of Carmel v. Board of Supervisors
27 N.Y.2d 975 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1970
However, since the courts below directed the board to adopt a permanent plan by July 1, 1969, the order appealed from should be modified so as to provide that the board act and adopt a plan of apportionment, meeting constitutional … (See, e.g., Franklin v. Mandeville, 26 N Y 2d 65, 70.) Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson concur in Per Curiam opinion. Ordered accordingly.
Cited 6 timesPublishedZeitlin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
46 N.Y.2d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1979
Cited 19 timesPublishedSyracuse Intercepting Sewer Board v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
255 N.Y. 288 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1931
Shortly after its creation, and in 1909, the board entered into a contract, known as contract No. 8, with one Nicholas D. Pound. … The Board was charged with the duty of selecting a responsible bidder, and this called for honest judgment and discretion. We think that the Board in this particular performed its duty.
Cited 7 timesPublishedClaim of Brown v. New York State Training School for Girls
285 N.Y. 37 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1941
(Matter of Heitz v. Ruppert, 218 N. Y. 148, 152 . See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hospital, 259 N. Y. 137, 141 .) … (Matter of Heitz v. Ruppert, supra, p. 152 .)
Cited 9 timesPublishedState University v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
55 N.Y.2d 896 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1982
Cited 22 timesPublishedBrowne v. New York State Board of Parole
10 N.Y.2d 116 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961
In the instant case, respondent did not seek review of a discretionary act of the board. … Y. 613 ; Matter of Daley v. Board of Estimate of City of N. Y., 258 App. Div. 165 ).
Cited 11 timesPublishedCommon Council v. Town Board of Bethlehem
19 N.Y.2d 646 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1967
Cited 1 timesPublishedFaymor Development Co. v. Board of Standards & Appeals
45 N.Y.2d 560 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1978
The city appeals claiming that the board lacked the power to reinstate the permit on the ground stated and that the courts may not compel the board to do an unauthorized act. … , 34 NY2d 324 , supra; Matter of Bayswater v Karagheuzoff, 37 NY2d 408 , supra).
Cited 33 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Yonkers Federation of Teachers
46 N.Y.2d 727 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1978
Even assuming that the terms of the agreement mandated that the award be advisory only (but see Matter of Yonkers Federation of Teachers v Board of Educ., 44 NY2d 752 ; Matter of Yonkers Federation of Teachers [Board of Educ … Forum v City of Binghamton, 44 NY2d 23 , 28-29; Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 582-583 ).
Cited 16 timesPublishedClaim of Mullins v. State Board of Parole
35 N.Y.2d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1975
Cited 17 timesPublishedPierre Pellaton Apts., Inc. v. Board of Assessors
43 N.Y.2d 769 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1977
Hopkins at the Appellate Division (reported at 53 AD2d 463 , sub nom. 860 Executive Towers v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Cited 28 timesPublishedSutton Area Community v. Board of Estimate
78 N.Y.2d 945 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1991
The record, viewed as a whole, reveals that the Board was fully informed of all pertinent environmental issues, including those dealing with the sewage treatment plant change, and considered these numerous factors before … Accordingly, the "hard look” standard of judicial review is satisfied and the determination must be confirmed (see, Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedIafrate v. Suffolk County Board of Elections
42 N.Y.2d 991 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1977
The record is devoid of any opposing affidavit or other proof from the board. … In Matter of Palla v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections ( 31 NY2d 36, 45 ), there were "issues of fact raised by the affidavits”.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Ass'n
46 N.Y.2d 553 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1979
Board of Educ., 33 NY2d 229 ). … In all other cases "it is the declared policy of this State to encourage 'public employers and * * * employee organizations to agree upon procedures for resolving disputes’ ” (Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington
Cited 46 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hopkins v. Board of Supervisors
7 N.Y. 556 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 1873
It was upon this ground that the comptroller advised the boards of supervisors of the several counties that the law for the creation of the debt was void, and required them to levy the tax directed by 'chapter 134 of the
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Bacon v. . Board of Supervisors
105 N.Y. 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1887
It is conceded that the power to fix the compensation of the district attorney and his assistants, clerks and officers, was vested by statute in the board of supervisors. … In this respect the case of Hobbs v. City of Yonkers ( 102 N. Y. 13 ) is in point. The judgment should be affirmed with costs. All concur. Judgment affirmed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Clancy v. Board of Supervisors
139 N.Y. 524 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1893
The relator, therefore, applied to a Special Term of the Supreme Court for a peremptory mandamus, requiring the board to recognize him as a supervisor of the city of Yonkers, and permit him to act as a member of the board … is “ providing for election of members of board of supervisors.”
Cited 17 timesPublishedDanis v. Commissioners of Board of Elections
10 N.Y.2d 802 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1961
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna