Case law

Fitzpatrick v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Board

241 N.Y. 515 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1925

Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

56 N.Y.2d 340 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1982

The New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board has determined that the apartments are exempt. … the words used (Bender v Jamaica Hosp., 40 NY2d 560 ; Matter of De Peyster, 210 NY 216 ).

Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards Appeals

290 N.Y. 109 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1943

Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280 ; Matter of Y. W. H. Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 .) … Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 .) The return of the Board shows nothing on that head".

Serenity Homes, Inc. v. Town Board of Wappinger

37 N.Y.2d 841 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1975

Board of Education v. City of New York

41 N.Y. 535 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1977

Kay Jewelry Co. v Board of Registration, 305 Mass 581; State ex rel. Coleman v Lewis, 181 SC 10.) … Montgomery v Daniels, 38 NY2d 41, 56 ; People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 117-118 ; Matter of Taylor v Sise, 33 NY2d 357, 365 ). .

Peo. Ex Rel. Hannan v. . Board of Health

153 N.Y. 513 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1897

Griffin v. Lathrop, 142 N. Y. 113 ; People ex rel. Fonda v. Morton, 148 N. Y. 156 .) … (Smith v. People, 47 N. Y. 330 ; Rosenplaenter v. Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262 ; Penoyar v. Kelsey, 150 N. Y. 77, 83 .)

Hill v. . Board of Supervisors of Livingston Co.

12 N.Y. 52 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1854

The same view of the law of this state was taken by the chancellor in the court for the correction of errors, in Bartlett v. Crozier (17 J.R., 439). … intrusting the board with the power of determining what bridges they will construct or repair.

People Ex Rel. Hoffman v. . Board of Education

141 N.Y. 86 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1894

Brown v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail Road

1 How. App. Cas. 52 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1847

Holbrook, 4 Paige, 169 ; Thurston v. Hancock, 12 Mass. 220 : Brown v. Windsor, 1 Crompton and Jervis R. 26; per Garrow B: 1 Rolle 430; Roberts v. Read, 16 East, 215; Smith v. … Dig. action on case for nuisance E (A); Moore v. Brown, 3 Dy. 319, b; 1 Bac. Ab. action on case F; 1 Salk. 21; 2 Ray, 1089; S. C. 2 Ray, 1091). The case of Fletcher v. The A. & S. R. R.

Thomas W. Finucane Co. v. Board of Education

190 N.Y. 76 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1907

Co. v. Nash ( 111 N.

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Board of Estimate

72 N.Y.2d 674 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1988

This error, Coca-Cola asserts, renders the Board of Estimate’s actions void. … Scarpetta v Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv., 28 NY2d 185, 189 ; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 108, at 452 [rev ed]).

People Ex Rel. Conway v. Board of Supervisors

68 N.Y. 114 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1877

In September, 1870, in the case of Phelps v. … (People ex rel. v. Supervisors of Otsego County, 51 N. Y., 401 , and cases cited.)

People Ex Rel. Lefever v. Board of Supervisors

34 N.Y. 268 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1866

The following cases are illustrations of the proper application of the rule: (The People v. Cook, 4 Seld., 68; Marchant v. Langworthy, 6 Hill, 646 ; Striker v. Kelly, 7 id., 24; Jackson v. … (Rex v. Lexdale, 1 Burr., 447.)

Village of Oneida v. Board of Supervisors

136 N.Y. 269 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1892

The case also contains the statement in substance that from the year 1882 to the year 1889, both inclusive, the board of supervisors of Madison county levied upon the town of Lenox for county purposes a certain named sum

People Ex Rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of Supervisors

135 N.Y. 522 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1892

(State ex rel., etc., v. Township of Union, 43 N. J. Law, 518 ; State ex rel., etc., v. Early, 46 id. 479; Hartshorn v. Ellsworth, 60 Me. 276 ; State v. Kansas City, etc., R. R. Co., 77 Mo. 143 ; People ex rel. v. … Baker, 35 Barb. 105 ; People ex rel., etc., v. Supervisors of Dutchess Co., 1 Hill, 50 ; Queen v. East & West India Rock Co., 2 El. & Bl. 466; King v. Church of St. Paneras, 3 A. & E. 535; Reg. v. Tithe Comrs., 19 L. J.

P. J. Panzeca, Inc. v. Board of Education

29 N.Y.2d 508 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1971

Although technical defenses in abatement are not favored where prejudice has not resulted, courts may not relieve a litigant of a positive statutory mandate, even to avoid a harsh result (Munroe v. Booth, 305 N. … Matter of Board of Educ. [Heckler Elec. Co.], 7 N Y 2d 476, 483-484). Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and G-ibson concur.

Strough v. Board of Supervisors of Jefferson County

119 N.Y. 212 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1890

The case of Bridges v. Board of Supervisors of Sullivan County ( 92 N. … (See Mayor, etc., v. Davenport, 92 N. Y. 604 .) To avoid misapprehension it should be observed that the act under consideration in Bridges v. Board of Supervisors, etc.

People ex rel. Hopkins v. Board of Supervisors

7 N.Y. 556 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 1873

It was upon this ground that the comptroller advised the boards of supervisors of the several counties that the law for the creation of the debt was void, and required them to levy the tax directed by 'chapter 134 of the

People Ex Rel. Bacon v. . Board of Supervisors

105 N.Y. 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1887

It is conceded that the power to fix the compensation of the district attorney and his assistants, clerks and officers, was vested by statute in the board of supervisors. … In this respect the case of Hobbs v. City of Yonkers ( 102 N. Y. 13 ) is in point. The judgment should be affirmed with costs. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Friends of the Pine Bush v. Planning Board

59 N.Y.2d 849 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1983