Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

1,879 results

1.50s

  • Kerr v. . Dougherty

    79 N.Y. 327 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1880

    It should also be noticed that it is at least questionable whether the restriction in the act of 1870 is hot qualified by the defendant’s charter, and should not be regarded as only an additional one besides those already … Clearly not; for the. rule is the same, without regard to the fact that the will was executed out of the State of Pennsylvania.

    Cited 88 timesPublished
  • Sporza v. . German Savings Bank

    192 N.Y. 8 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1908

    It clearly shows what the practice had been up to a period subsequent to the adoption of the Constitution of 1846. … Such commitment is based upon an order "adjudging such person to be insane upon a certificate of lunacy made by two qualified medical examiners in lunacy." (Laws of 1896, chap. 545, § 60.)

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF SCHULZ v. State

    81 N.Y.2d 336 · New York Court of Appeals · May 11, 1993

    Serious concerns accompany a complete cloak of immunity that would preclude access to judicial review of challenged public financing schemes. … Defendants clearly understood that voter standing was being alleged.

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • The People v. . Cook

    8 N.Y. 67 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1853

    It was treated throughout as a question of fact, to be established by the evidence. … Upon the analogy of these and other cases the requirements of the statutes which were not complied with, are clearly directory.

    Cited 157 timesPublished
  • Everitt v. . Everitt

    29 N.Y. 39 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1864

    If this was less clearly so upon the terms of the statutes, the particular *Page 73 provisions of this will, show that the gifts were distributive and several, and not joint. … Cases of devises and bequests absolute by the primary clause, but which are in a subsequent part qualified by a contingent executory limitation, are frequent in our own reports. ( Norris v. Beyea, 3 Kern. 273; Tyson v.

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • People v. Culhane

    33 N.Y.2d 90 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1973

    Ct, 202, 205-208 — police commissioner not qualified as a juror to sit on case involving shooting of a police officer; Sims v. … The list contained in section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was clearly meant to be exclusive since the statute provided that “ A challenge for implied bias may be taken for all or any of the following causes, and

    Cited 137 timesPublished
  • Tracy v. Talmage

    4 N.Y. 162 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1856

    The maxim, ex dolo malo non oritur actio is qualified by another, viz., in pari delicto melior est conditio defendentis. … Tt overlooks distinctions which are clearly settled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chamberlain v. . Chamberlain

    43 N.Y. 424 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1871

    This is exemplified by the weE-established rule in cases of bequests within the statute of mortmain. … The courts ought not to impute an intent to the legislature, not clearly expressed in direct hostility to the traditions and policy of the past.

    Cited 171 timesPublished
  • Yale v. . Dederer

    18 N.Y. 265 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1858

    Now, a married woman may be the beneficiary in any one of the trusts which the statute allows to be created, but, like other beneficiaries, her power is qualified by the section quoted. … If not at law, which is very clear, then quite as clearly not in equity.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.

    18 N.Y.2d 57 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1966

    A qualified expert witness, who was at the premises while the water was flowing, testified that a sprinkler head discharges water due to fire, a physical blow, freezing or metal fatigue. … What happened, in this instance, appears rather clearly from the ADT fire report (Exhibit 9) which refers to the circumstance *65 that the gravity tank transmitter had been in trouble.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Stokes v. . People of the State of N.Y.

    53 N.Y. 164 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1873

    The plaintiff in error clearly had no right to interpose these pleas a second time, or others of a similar character, and was properly required by the court to plead to the indictment, and, upon his standing mute, the proper … How is guilt established by proof only of one of the ingredients essential to constitute crime?

    Cited 173 timesPublished
  • Troy & Boston Railroad Co. v. Boston, Hoosac Tunnel & Western Railway

    86 N.Y. 107 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1881

    Livingston the plaintiff’s rights had been established in one action at law. In Akrill v. … If against the defendant, it will be time to urge that plea when by one action the plaintiff’s legal right shall have been established, and its adversary still offends.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)

    5 N.Y.2d 300 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1959

    The challenge to jurisdiction is on the ground of sovereign immunity which the Government asserts has never been waived in a matter of this sort and has not been waived here ( Stanley v. Schwalby , 162 U. … As is manifest, no provision of the agreement transferred title or possession to any property and, just as clearly, there was no vendor-vendee relationship created between the respondent and his client, as those terms are

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • In re Arbitration between Central Mutual Insurance & Bemiss

    12 N.Y.3d 648 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

    The majority, however, rejected Bemiss’s additional claim that once she qualified for SUM payments by exhausting Kowalczyk’s policy, she was free to settle with Gen-ski without obtaining Central’s prior written consent or … In the original version of Condition 10 (former Condition 8), “any negligent party” clearly referred to all the tortfeasors in a multiple-tortfeasor accident.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Volokh v. James

    2026 NY Slip Op 03913 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2026

    network plaintiffs obtained a stay of its enforcement from the federal district court, claiming that its provisions would effectively compel them to speak out against hateful conduct and otherwise chill the publication of qualifying … Rumble describes itself as "on a mission to protect a free and open internet," and considers its platform "immune to cancel culture."

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank

    114 N.Y. 122 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1889

    The inser *131 tian of the word “ representing ” was clearly of no advantage to the petition, and if it had been omitted, there would have been no opportunity for criticism. … The doctrine established in this state upon the subject, does not permit the conclusion that the scroll upon the bonds in question was the seal of the commissioners.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • The Matter of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. Joseph A. Schueckler

    New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2020

    Therefore, under the express terms of EDPL 206 (A), National Fuel qualified for statutory exemption from EDPL article 2 procedures. … The first page of the FERC certificate establishes the conditional nature of FERC’s authorization.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brearley School, Ltd. v. Ward

    201 N.Y. 358 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1911

    Is this provision immune from legislative change? Would the statute granting power to make a will on arriving at the age of 18 years be inoperative as to property devised under a will prior to its enactment ? … It was said that under this statutory provision the right of the wife did not rest upon contract but upon a legislative grant and the court expressly held that the state clearly had the right to change and regulate the exemption

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • People v. Sidbury

    42 N.Y.3d 497 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2024

    Rather, the Jackson Court stated that no "case[ ] clearly establish[es] that the Constitution requires a case-by-case balancing of interests{**42 NY3d at 521} before such a rule can be enforced" ( Jackson , 569 US at 510) … Initially, defendant's notice clearly fails to satisfy the substantive or procedural requirements of CPL 250.10.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • T. B.R.R. Co. v. . B., H.T. W. Ry. Co.

    86 N.Y. 107 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1881

    Livingston the plaintiff's rights had been established in one action at law. In Akrill v. … If against the defendant, it will be time to urge that plea when by one action the plaintiff's legal right shall have been established, and its adversary still offends.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.