Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.06s

  • Page Airways, Inc. v. Town Board

    8 N.Y.2d 980 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bissell v. . Sackett Wall Board Company

    188 N.Y. 613 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Faulisi v. Board of Police Commissioners

    1 N.Y.2d 918 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1956

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Board Sup'rs Monroe Co.

    37 N.Y. St. Rep. 964 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1891

    Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Haight, J., in Crowninshield v. Board of Sup’rs Cayuga Co. 37 N. Y. State Rep 96. All concur. Affirming 30 N. Y. State Rep. 706.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Drew v. Board of Education

    29 N.Y.2d 510 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1971

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Torok Trust v. Town Board of Alexandria

    25 N.Y.3d 1098 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The People v. William Brown / The People v. Patrick Thomas

    25 N.Y.3d 973 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2015

    The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, determined that Supreme Court should have suppressed the showup identification of defendant William Brown ( 115 AD3d 38 [1st Dept 2014]) and the showup identification … While acknowledging that “determinations as to reasonable suspicion typically present a mixed question of law and fact,” the dissent cites People v McRay ( 51 NY2d 594 [1980]) for the proposition that these cases instead

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Construction Corp.

    41 N.Y. 397 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1977

    In accordance with long-established principles, the existence of a binding contract is not dependent on the subjective intent of either Brown or Cale (Mencher v Weiss, 306 NY 1, 7 ; Hotchkiss v National City Bank of N. … Jemzura v Jemzura, 36 NY2d 496, 503-504 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matter of Poucher v. Teachers' R. Board

    249 N.Y. 414 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1928

    K) is not effective until delivered, and such delivery does not result from a mere deposit in the mails (Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna Insurance Co., 127 N. Y. 608 ; Peabody v. Satterlee, 166 N. Y. 174 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matter of Gramlich v. Board of Education

    297 N.Y. 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1948

    We granted the Board of Education leave to appeal to this court. In Matter of Leahy v. City of New York ( 285 N. … Ward & Gow v. Krinsky, 259 U. S. 503 ), and Matter of Europe v. Addison Amusements, Inc. ( 231 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.

    13 N.Y.2d 1172 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1964

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bikman v. New York City Loft Board

    14 N.Y.3d 377 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2010

    Subsequently, in 2001, Broadway applied to the Loft Board for an abandonment order pursuant to 29 RCNY 2-10 (f). … Supreme Court annulled the Loft Board’s determination ( 2007 NY Slip Op 30541[U] ), holding that the proceeding was governed by Matter of Moskowitz v Jorden ( 27 AD3d 305 [1st Dept 2006], lv dismissed 7 NY3d 783 [2006]),

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. Board of Education

    294 N.Y. 676 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1945

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Pilots v. Vanderbilt

    31 N.Y. 265 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1864

    The board of commissioners have never given the notice required by the act. … It affirmatively appears, not only that there was no written resolution *270 or order of the board directing the notice, and no record of their proceedings, but that, while the board verbally ordered a notice to be given

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. Bloomberg

    20 N.Y.3d 1075 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Costello v. New York State Board of Parole

    23 N.Y.3d 1002 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

    The Executive Law requires the Board of Parole (the Board) to consider any victim impact statement in the decision to grant or deny parole release to an inmate (see Executive Law § 259-i [2] [c] [A]). … On the contrary, we hope that our decision will impel both parole boards and district attorneys to comply fully with the letter and spirit of Executive Law § 259-i (2) (c) (A) (v) and CPL 440.50 (1), so that the effect of

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kasckarow v. Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders

    22 N.Y.3d 968 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • A. D. Granger Co. v. Brown-Ketcham Iron Works

    204 N.Y. 218 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1912

    In the case of Weeks v. O'Brien ( 141 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hague Corp. v. Empire Zone Designation Board

    19 N.Y.3d 1016 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company

    289 N.Y. 821 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1943

    Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the authority of Cooke v. Drigant, impleaded with John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company [ 289 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.