Case law

Martin v. Board of Supervisors

2 N.Y. 645 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1864

It was held by chis court, in Brady v. The Supervisors of the City and County of New York (10 N. Y. … (The People v. Supervisors of Columbia, 10 Wend. 363 ; 2 Sand. S. C. 460.)

Brown v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

86 N.Y.2d 808 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1995

Ten Hoeve v. Board of Education

62 N.Y.2d 883 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1984

Slewett & Farber v. Board of Assessors

54 N.Y.2d 771 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1981

Mitchell v. Zoning Board of Appeals

54 N.Y.2d 727 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1981

We cannot say as a matter of law that the determination of the board of appeals to grant an area variance was either arbitrary, capricious or without a rational basis. *729 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli

Pitts v. Buffalo Board of Education

39 N.Y.2d 737 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1976

Sibarco Stations, Inc. v. Town Board

22 N.Y.2d 668 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1968

Zuckerman v. Town Board of Hempstead

5 N.Y.2d 916 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1959

Bapps Corp. v. Board of Assessors

304 N.Y. 766 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1952

Daniman v. Board of Education

1 N.Y.2d 855 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1956

Dubin v. Board of Regents

1 N.Y.2d 58 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1956

(Matter of Cherry v. Board of Regents, 289 N. Y. 148 .) … That being so, we are constrained to rule that the holding of the Board of Regents is arbitrary and must be annulled. Nothing decided in Finlay Straus, Inc., v. University of State of N. Y. ( 270 App.

Hazeltine Corp. v. Board of Assessors

89 N.Y.2d 1070 · New York Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997

Maloney v. Board of Elections

65 N.Y. 964 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1985

Even if we were to strike the first volume of the candidate’s designating petition because of superfluous pages (see, Matter of Jonas v Black, 63 NY2d 685 , affg 104 AD2d 466 ), the other three volumes of his petition contain … The remaining defects in the petition cited by appellant, slight overstatements of total signatures on the cover sheets, are inconsequential (see, Matter of Staber v Fidler, 65 NY2d 529 ).

Musorofiti v. Board of Education

65 N.Y. 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1985

Brown v. Dutchess County Mutual Ins. Co., Poughkeepsie

181 N.Y. 519 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1905

Brown, Wheelock, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Coty, Inc.

291 N.Y. 601 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1943

Brown v. United States & Brazil Mail Steamship Co.

60 N.Y. St. Rep. 867 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1894

Bott v. Board of Education

41 N.Y. 265 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1977

Smith v. Board of Education

65 N.Y. 797 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1985

On the issue of back pay, in Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ. ( 35 NY2d 534 ), we held that a tenured teacher could not be suspended without pay pending a section 3020-a hearing absent explicit statutory authorization. … Board of Educ., 47 NY2d 726, 727 ; Matter of Amos v Board of Educ., 43 NY2d 706 , affg 54 AD2d 297 ; see also, Matter of Bali v Board of Educ., 68 AD2d 360, 366 [Simons, J., dissenting in part], appeal dismissed 48 NY2d 630

Arbegast v. Board of Education

65 N.Y. 161 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1985

Plaintiff sued both the Board of Education and defendant Buckeye, but settled her claim against the Board of Education prior to trial. … ; Muller v McKesson, 73 NY 195, 200 ; Lynch v McNally, 73 NY 347, 349; see, Strunk v Zoltanski, 62 NY2d 572 ; People v Sandgren, 302 NY 331, 339 ; cf.