Case law

Brown v. Lavine

37 N.Y.2d 317 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1975

Aiello v Commissioner of Public Welfare, 358 Mass 91; Rex Investigative & Patrol Agency v Collura, 329 F Supp 696 ; Administrative Hearings—Aid of Counsel, Ann., 33 ALR3d 229, 289.) … (Crowder v Gardner, 249 F Supp 678 ; Ihnen v Celebrezze, 223 F Supp 157 ; Hall v Celebrezze, 217 F Supp 905 .)

Price v. . Brown

98 N.Y. 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885

(Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ; Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 id. 92.) … In Pease v.

People v. Brown

24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969

Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.

Heintz v. Brown

80 N.Y.2d 998 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1992

In this regard, the court’s scope of review is limited to an assessment of whether there is a rational basis for the administrative determination without disturbing underlying factual determinations (Matter of Pell v Board

Moore v. . Brown

139 N.Y. 127 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1893

I refer to Doe v. Wood (2 Barnw. & Aid. 724).

Brown v. . Blydenburgh

7 N.Y. 141 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1852

Judgment affirmed. 1 1 See Foster v. Beals, 21 N. Y. 247 ; Kellogg v. Smith, 26 Ibid. 18. … Van Keuren v. Corkins, 66 N. Y. 77 ; s. c. 4 Hun 129 ; Wanzer v. Cary, 12 Ibid. 403 ; s. c. 76 N. Y. 526 . Nor do they apply to a purchaser of the land. Purdy v. Huntington, 46 Barb. 389 ; s. o. 42 N. Y. 334 .

Nelson v. . Brown

144 N.Y. 384 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1895

The question of the competency of adjudicating in foreclosure proceedings upon a dower right has been passed upon in the case of Merchants' Bank v. Thomson ( 55 N. Y. 7 ). … They contain a direct expression of intention and fall readily under the exception mentioned in the cases cited by the appellant of Lewis v. Smith ( 9 N. Y. 511 ), and Konvalinka v. Schlegel (104 id. 125).

Rawley v. . Brown

71 N.Y. 85 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1877

Hough v. . Brown

19 N.Y. 111 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1859

BROWN, Esq., Buffalo: "We accept of your proposition for our entire freight from Chicago to New York and Boston. We include some nine or ten thousand hides. … You will acknowledge the acceptance of the above, and direct your communication to Andrew Brown, Monson, Mass. "ANDREW BROWN Co., "R.M. O.S. HOUGH."

Tuckerman v. . Brown

33 N.Y. 297 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1865

In Brown, Receiver, v. Appleby (1 Sandf. S. … C., 629), it was held that a note of that description cannot be given up to the maker without consid *308 oration, even by the board of trustees of the company, and if so given up, a receiver of the company’s effects may

Brown v. . Robinson

224 N.Y. 301 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1918

(Matthews v. Coe, 70 N. Y. 239 ; White v. Benjamin, 138 id. 623, 624.) … (White v. Benjamin, supra; Matthews v. Coe, supra.)

Mandle v. Brown

5 N.Y.2d 51 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1958

Matter of Golden v. Joseph, 307 N. Y. 62 ). … Y. 33 ; Matter of Crosby v. Board of Educ., 187 App. Div. 205, 209-210 , affd. 226 N. Y. 705 ; People ex rel. Stokes v. Tully, 108 App. Div. 345, 351 ). Matter of Williams v. Morton (supra) is not to the contrary.

Holland v. . Brown

140 N.Y. 344 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1893

(Cook v. Travis, 20 N. Y. 400 : Brown v. Valkenburg, 64 id. 76: Pope v. Allen, 90 id. 298.) … (Trustees, etc., Town of East Hampton v. Kirk, 84 N. Y. 220 ; Jackson v. Halstead, 5 Cowen, 216; Baker v. Van Valkenburgh, 29 Barb. 319 .)

Wright v. . Brown

67 N.Y. 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1876

As was said in the People v. The Superior Court of New York, “there is no standard by which the weight of conflicting evidence can be ascertained.

Manning v. Brown

91 N.Y.2d 116 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1997

Her injuries were the direct result of her knowing participation in joyriding (see, Barker v Kallash, supra, 63 NY2d, at 25, 32 ; cf., Humphrey v State of New York, 60 NY2d 742, 744 ). … Amidon also testified that she found the keys under a set of papers out of plain view and therefore plaintiffs claim that the Browns violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) 2 is likewise without merit (see, Banellis v

Harris v. . Brown

93 N.Y. 390 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1883

Brown v. . Thurber

77 N.Y. 613 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879

Patterson v. . Brown

32 N.Y. 81 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1865

Lombard, who held the legal title by a fraud, pending an action to enforce the claim of the defendant, Brown, a judgment creditor of Bowley, the equitable owner thereof. … Lombard was fraudulent and void, as against the defendant Brown, the judgment creditor; that Mrs.

People v. Brown

20 N.Y.2d 238 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1967

On June 12,1967, the United States Supreme -Court decided the cases of United States v. Wade, Stovall v. Denno and Gilbert v. California ( 388 U. S. 218, 293, 263 ). … The Stovall case held, however, in line with Linkletter v. Walker ( 381 U. S. 618 ), Tehan v. Shott ( 382 U. S. 406 ) and Johnson v. New Jersey ( 384 U.

Brown v. . Smith

80 N.Y. 650 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1880