Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.86s
Raimundi v. Board of Elections
32 N.Y.2d 768 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1973
The applicable statutory provisions require identification of all reg *770 istered voters by buff cards in elections to choose members of community school boards.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFaulisi v. Board of Police Commissioners
2 N.Y.2d 812 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1957
Cited 1 timesPublishedMinisters & Missionaries Benefit Board v. Snow
25 N.Y.3d 935 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell v. Zoning Board of Appeals
53 N.Y.2d 982 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSame v. County Board of Canvassers
41 N.Y. St. Rep. 950 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1891
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textMatter of Brown v. Teachers' Retirement Bd. City of N.Y
264 N.Y. 493 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1934
Cited 3 timesPublishedPowell v. Board of Higher Education
30 N.Y.2d 889 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1972
Cited 2 timesPublished81 N.Y.2d 1053 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1993
Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231 [citation omitted]). … This Court has held that Town Boards may summarily abate nuisances in this manner in appropriate circumstances and compel property owners to bear the cost of abatement without prior notice (see, Lane v City of Mount Vernon
Cited 12 timesPublished2 Park Avenue Associates v. Cross & Brown Co.
36 N.Y.2d 286 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1975
Studley, Inc. v Geisinger, 12 Misc 2d 527, 529 , affd 7 AD2d 844 ; Gordon v Kleinman, 29 Misc 2d 281, 282 .) To visualize how its purpose was to be carried out, it is useful to analyze the article’s structure and scope. … Galbreath-Ruffin v 40th & 3rd Corp., 25 AD2d 114, 124 , mod on other grounds 19 NY2d 354 ; Meyer v Stein, 161 Misc 91, 91-92 , affd 247 App Div 865 ).
Cited 10 timesPublishedBoard of Managers v. Town of Amherst
23 N.Y.3d 168 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 2014
Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d 179, 188 [1998]). … Agency, 248 AD2d 974, 974 [4th Dept 1998]; see also Matter of Thomas v Davis, 96 AD3d 1412, 1414 [4th Dept 2012]; Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 45 AD3d 687, 687 [2d Dept 2007]; Matter of State of New York v Town of Thurman,
Cited 34 timesPublished80 N.Y.2d 823 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1992
Cited 1 timesPublished300 N.Y. 644 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1950
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Board of Pharmacy v. . Gasau
195 N.Y. 197 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1909
and by the board destroyed. “ Section 199. … (Burks v. Bosso, 180 N.Y. 341, 344 .) The term “chemicals,” as found in section 197, is, therefore, to be limited to chemicals that are used as medicines or drugs.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCostello v. New York State Board
22 N.Y.3d 1097 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublishedSibarco Stations, Inc. v. Town Board
24 N.Y.2d 900 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1969
Y. 541 ; Matter of Poczatek v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Huntington, 26 A D 2d 556). The new 1968 ordinance ds valid (Matter of Epstein v. Weisser, 278 App. Div. 668 , affd. 302 N. Y. 916 ; cf. … Matter of Concordia Collegiate Inst. v. Miller, 301 N. Y. 189, 195-196 ). Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur; Judge Keating taking no part.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHasbrook v. Kingston Board of Education
5 Abb. Pr. 399 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1867
Co. v. Supervisors of N. Y., 32 How. Pr., 359 ). The party must take Ms remedy by action for the damages he has sustained. (Id.). Upon the merits, I am also of the opinion that the action of the board was legal. … Under the decision in Ketchum v. City of Buffalo (14 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTown of Easton v. . Canal Board
216 N.Y. 486 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1916
Co. v. Canal Board, 204 N. Y. 471 .) … (Rolston v. Missouri Fund Comrs., 120 U. S. 390, 411 ; Louisiana v. Jumel, 107 U. S. 711.) As was said by Mr. Chief Justice Waite: “The litigation is with the officer, not the state.” (Ralston v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHalfmoon Bridge Co. v. . Canal Board
213 N.Y. 160 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1914
(Hayden v. Mathews, 4 App. Div. 338 ; affd., 158 N. Y. 735 ; Williams v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 61 How. Pr. 305 ; Mingay v. Holly Mfg. Co., 99 N. Y. 270 ; Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v. Canal Board, 146 App. … Co. v. Canal Board, supra), the appellant was entitled to the judgment which it was demanding.
Cited 8 timesPublishedVerduce v. Board of Higher Education
8 N.Y.2d 928 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1960
Cited 1 timesPublishedHaberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals
9 N.Y.3d 269 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2007
We hold that, where a zoning board of appeals has voted to grant a variance, the board’s lawyer, acting with actual or apparent authority, may agree to extend the time to build the improvements permitted by the variance. … A second board meeting and vote are not required.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna