Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.81s
Lavender v. Zoning Board of Appeals
28 N.Y.3d 1051 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2016
Cited 2 timesPublished44 N.Y. 667 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1978
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. . United States Express Realty Company
220 N.Y. 711 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur
208 N.Y. 521 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . the State of New York
236 N.Y. 611 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1923
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Twenty-third St. R'way Co.
30 N.Y. St. Rep. 1014 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 1890
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown & Kreuger, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance
17 N.Y.2d 698 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1966
Judgment affirmed, without costs (Davis Yarn Co. v. Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co., 293 N. Y. 236 [1944]; Golde v. Whipple & Co., 7 App. Div. 48 [1st Dept., 1896]; Page v. Sun Ins. … Co. v. Lumber Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 251 App. Div. 231 [1st Dept., 1937]; 169 A. L. R. 401 et seq.). No opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Furo, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilepri, Bergan and Keating.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . the Hartford Fire Insurance Company
132 N.Y. 539 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1892
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Bank of Pittsburgh National Association
249 N.Y. 515 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1928
Cited 0 timesPublishedNelson v. Board of Collective Bargaining
85 N.Y.2d 956 · New York Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995
Cited 1 timesPublishedReister v. Town Board of Fleming
18 N.Y.2d 92 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1966
Pursuant to the pertinent provisions of the Town Law (§•§ 190-195), a petition, seeking the establishment of a water district, was presented to the Town Board of the Town of Fleming, one of the respondents herein. … Y. 83, 86-87 ; Stelz v. Shreck, 128 N.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBrown v. Keeney Settlement Cheese Ass'n
14 N.Y. 242 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1874
It has been frequently decided, and very recently in the case of Pfohl v. … (Life Ins. and Trust Co. v. Milner, 1 Barb. Ch., 353 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedRochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Brown
239 N.Y. 571 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1924
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. J.P. Logan Realty Company, Inc.
290 N.Y. 858 · New York Court of Appeals · May 27, 1943
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . New York Cab Company, Limited
188 N.Y. 633 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1907
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. . City National Bank of Plattsburg
221 N.Y. 678 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedZuckerbrod v. Board of Higher Education
303 N.Y. 609 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1951
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textTown Board of Huntington v. Plonski
10 N.Y.2d 1035 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1962
this court on November 16,1961 — at which time the 1960 amendment to the zoning ordinance was challenged *1038 for lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard — there were submitted to us excerpts taken from the Town Board … Kelly (a member of the Town Board) stated that he voted yes for this proposal on the strength of the statement made by the Town Attorney and the Supervisor that this would not retroactively affect existing parking lots and
Cited 1 timesPublished64 N.Y.2d 281 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1985
Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 885 , 887; Matter of Smyton, 19 Ed Dept Rep 281). … Prior to adoption of part 30, seniority did not include the right to “bump” (Matter of Cole v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 941 , affg 90 AD2d 419, 427-428, n 6 ), and by limiting those rights to tenure areas “created by this Part
Cited 1 timesPublishedAnello v. Zoning Board of Appeals
89 N.Y.2d 535 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1997
The Board also found that granting a "variance would have a substantial detrimental impact upon the surrounding area and constitute a detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood.” … While the Board’s appeal was pending before the Appellate Division, this Court rendered its decision in Matter of Khan v Zoning Bd. of Appeals ( 87 NY2d 344 ), rejecting the "single and separate ownership” doctrine.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna