Case law

Soper v. . Brown

136 N.Y. 244 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1892

In Sibley v. … (In re Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 , and cases cited.) The judgment should be affirmed. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. Ristich

36 N.Y.2d 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1975

Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 .) … (Matter of Smart v. Francis, 43 A D 2d 623, revd. 35 N Y 2d 872; Matter of Merchant v. New York State Dept. of Mental Hygiene, 41 A D 2d 588; Matter of Reid v. Greenberg, 40 A D 2d 1078; Matter of Traber v.

Brown v. . Foster

108 N.Y. 387 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1888

(Reed v. Randall, 29 N. Y. 358 ; Beck v. Sheldon, 48 id. 365 ; Dutchess Co. v. Harding, 49 id. 321.) *392 The cases cited by the learned counsel for the appellant have been examined. … (Lillywhite v. Devereux, 15 M. & W. 285.)

Brown v. Poritzky

30 N.Y.2d 289 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1972

The Appellate Division reversed on the law holding that Arkawy’s negligence should not be imputed to Brown so as to bar Brown’s recovery in an action against the defendant and ordered a new trial. … As stated earlier, Brown sold his insurance business to Poritzky and as a condition of the sale, Poritzky was to be the exclusive insurance broker for Brown’s real estate holdings.

Franklin v. . Brown

118 N.Y. 110 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1889

(Witty v. Matthews, 52 N. Y. 512 ; Jaffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398 ; Edwands v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 245 ; Cleves v. Willoughby, 7 Hill, 83 ; Mumford v. Brown, 6 Cow. 475 ; Westlake v. … (Edwards v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 248 ; Howard v. Doolittle, 3 Duer, 475 ; Carson v. Godley, 26 Penn. St. 117; Dutton v. Gerrish, 9 Cush. 89 ; Chadwick v. Woodward, 13 Abb. [N. C.] 441; Coulson v.

People v. Brown

95 N.Y.2d 942 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2000

Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review (see, People v Hallman, 92 NY2d 840 ; People v Cloud, 79 NY2d 786 ; People … v Burr, 70 NY2d 354 ). *944 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Barnes v. . Brown

80 N.Y. 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1880

(Mechanics’ Bank v. The N. Y. and N. H. R. R. Co., 13 N. Y., 599 ; Bruff v. Mali, 36 id., 200; Morgan v. Skiddy, 62 id. 319; Shotwell v. Mali, 38 Barb., 445 .) … (Risley v. Indianapolis, B. and W. R. R. Co., 62 N. Y., 240 ; Butts v. Wood, 37 id., 317 ; Stewart v. The Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 9 Vroom, 506 ; Gardner v. Butler, 30 N. J. Eq., 703; Foster v.

Brown v. . Leigh

49 N.Y. 78 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1872

Hollister v. Livingston ( 9 How. Pr. Rep., 140 ); Field v. Morse (8 id., 47); Dows v. Green (3 id., 377) are cases of this class. In other cases (Mason v. Whitely, 4 Duer, 611 ; Prindle v. Aldrich, 13 How. … Co. v. Tibbits, 11 id., 168, and others), it has been held that a new cause of action or defence might be set up.

People v. Brown

48 N.Y.2d 921 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1979

The defendant contends that the Trial Judge did not apply the proper criteria with respect to the prosecutor’s right to cross-examine the defendant concerning his prior criminal record (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 ). … In addition, since the exclusion of prior convictions is a discretionary determination for the trial courts and fact-reviewing intermediate appellate courts, no further review by this court is warranted (People v Shields,

People v. Brown

40 N.Y.2d 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1976

penal interest (People v Wheatman, supra; see, also, United States v Harris, supra). … , People v Wheatman, 29 NY2d 337 , supra; People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549, 558 , supra).

Brown v. . Mailler

12 N.Y. 118 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1854

But the cases in this state are the other way, and the question has been settled against the competency of such evidence in the court of last resort. ( Paige v. Cagwin, 7 Hill, 361 , 369.)

People v. Brown

24 N.Y.2d 168 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1969

As we said in People v. … Y. 153, 163 ; see, also, People v. Steinhardt, 9 N Y 2d 267; People v. Jackson , 7 N Y 2d 142; People v. Marks, 6 N Y 2d 67; People v. Ochs, 3 N Y 2d 54; People v. Lovello, 1 N Y 2d 436; People v.

Daley v. . Brown

167 N.Y. 381 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1901

(Todd v. Nelson, 109 N. Y. 316, 324 ; Caponigri v. Altieri, 165 N. Y. 255, 263 ; Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 , 190 ; Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 106 N. Y. 157 .) As was said by Chief Justice Nelson in Ford v. … Brown, one of the defendants, testified that Finnegan was foreman of the excavation and hired laborers, but did not hire or discharge engineers.

Hibbs v. . Brown

190 N.Y. 167 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1907

Platt v. … Comm . v.

Galen v. . Brown

22 N.Y. 37 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1860

is in possession, and is entitled to the possession for a definite period, that the chattels mortgaged may be seized upon execution against the mortgagor, or that the latter has any leviable interest therein. ( Mattison v. … Baucus, 1 Comst., 295; Hull v. Carnley, 1 Kern., 501.)

People v. Brown

25 N.Y.2d 374 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1969

(See People v. Sine, 277 App. Div. 908 ; see, also, Denzer and McQuillan, Practice Commentary Penal Law, § 140.00 *377 [McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 39, part 1, pp. 340, 342].) … Since the People thus failed in their burden of proving each and every element of the crime charged, and, specifically, the absence or loss of a statutory privilege or license to enter and remain (see People v.

Wood v. . Brown

34 N.Y. 337 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1866

In Seaman v. Durea ( 11 N. … (Williams on Ex., 1548; Langford v. Gascon, 11 Vesey, 335; Clark v. Clark, 8 Paige, 152 .)

Malins v. . Brown

4 N.Y. 403 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1850

.; 3 Atk . 1; Carman v. Cooke, 1 Sch. Lef . 40.) In Wetmore v. White, (2 Cai. Cas. in Err . 109,) it was assumed, that payment of the consideration entitled the party to a specific performance.

Risley v. . Brown

67 N.Y. 160 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1876

Abner Brown alone appealed to the General Term of the Supreme Court, and there the' judgment was affirmed. … It is, therefore, unquestioned that the judgment appealed from cannot be enforced against the estate of Abner Brown.

People v. Brown

56 N.Y.2d 242 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1982

Ford, 46 NY2d 1021 ; People v Session, 34 NY2d 254 ). … Teen’s affidavit also stated that he never conspired to kill Thomas Wright with Brown or anyone else, and that he never saw Brown until after he (Teen) was arrested.