Case law

Exxon Corp. v. East Brunswick Tp.

5 N.J. Tax 216 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 16, 1982

Co. of N.J. v. … In East Orange v.

George A. Fuller Co. v. Jersey City

21 N.J. Misc. 38 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 19, 1943

In the case of Montclair v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 382; 22 Atl. Rep. (2d) 525; affirmed, 128 N. J. … The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Crawford v. Roloson, 149 N. E. Rep. 707, construed the words “as soon as may be” to be the equivalent of “as soon as was reasonably possible.”

Rothman v. City of Hackensack

1 N.J. Tax 438 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 26, 1980

The evidence was in a state of equipoise and neither side overcame the presumption of correct *442 ness of the county board judgment with the required quality and quantity of proofs. Passaic v. … Greenwald v. Borough of Metuchen, *444 supra.

525 Realty Holding Co. v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights

3 N.J. Tax 206 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 21, 1981

The assessments and county board judgment reflect the following: Block 153, Lot 1 Block 133, Lot 11-20 Assessment County Board Assessment County Board Land $ 47,500 $ 47,500 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Improvements 253,200 137,500 … New Brunswick v.

EWING TOWNSHIP v. MERCER PAPER TUBE CORP.

8 N.J. Tax 84 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 19, 1985

It relies upon the reasoning expressed in Village Supermarkets, Inc. v. … Judge Hopkins pointed out that by reason of the ruling in Rabstein v.

Eastampton Township v. Maimon & Smith

9 N.J. Tax 602 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 30, 1988

N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.8; Eagle Plaza Assocs. v. Voorhees Tp., 6 N.J. Tax 582 (Tax Ct.1984). … The board should have acted to correct same. A county board of taxation has jurisdiction, within its statutory time limitations, to correct its own erroneous judgment. Vicari v.

City of Hackensack v. Hackensack Trust Co.

19 N.J. Misc. 260 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 4, 1941

Petitioner’s reliance upon City of Newark v. … But see City of Garfield v. Forstmann Woolen Co., Id., p. 740. The petitions are dismissed for the reasons stated.

Huwang v. Hillside Township

21 N.J. Tax 496 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 13, 2004

[Schneider v. … Cohen v.

City of Newark v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.

18 N.J. Misc. 560 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 10, 1940

See Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment (Supreme Court, 1930), 107 N. J. L. 35; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1931), 108 N. J. L. 195; Hoboken v. The Hoboken Dock Co. … (State Board), filed September 12th, 1939; City of Newark v. New Jersey Investment Co. (State Board, 1940), 18 N. J. Mis. R. 182; 11 Atl. Rep. (2d) 730; City of Newark v. Universal Insurance Co. (State Board), 18 N. J.

Borough of Alpine v. Gilbert

10 N.J. Tax 537 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 30, 1989

Salem v. Salem Cty. … Bass River Tp. v. Driscoll, 3 N.J. Tax 177 (Tax Ct.1981). Here, however, the board did not issue any revised judgment. Instead, it advised Alpine that the original judgment would not be revised.

Township of Bloomfield v. Essex County Tax Administrator

12 N.J. Tax 543 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 1, 1992

The Legislature has not specified any particular method to be utilized by a county board in arriving at its final county equalization table; any reasonable and efficient method may be used. Willingboro v. … The Middlesex County Board has applied the unweighted, unclassified ratio to all its municipalities. Its method has received judicial sanction. Perth Amboy v.

Morris-Sussex Area Co. v. Hopatcong Borough

15 N.J. Tax 438 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 21, 1996

Wellman v. Bergmann was followed in Mitsch v. … Partnership v.

Union City Associates v. City of Union City

10 N.J. Tax 581 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 19, 1989

board judgment. … Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 35 N.J. 343, 356 , 173 A.2d 225 (1961). Prior to Applestein the Supreme Court emphasized the need to resolve an entire controversy in a single action. In Ajamian v.

Northvale Borough v. Director, Division of Taxation

17 N.J. Tax 204 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 30, 1998

South Plainfield Bor. v. Kentile Floors, Inc., supra. … Union Terminal Cold Storage v. *209 Spence, 17 N.J. 162 , 110 A.2d 110 (1954).

Atlantic City v. Moltich

3 N.J. Tax 147 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 5, 1981

Since the county board’s judgments had been appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals, they were not conclusive and binding upon the municipality. In the recently decided case of Manturi v. V. J. … In Board of Directors of Chicago Theological Sem. v.

Wellington Belleville, L.L.C. v. Belleville Township

20 N.J. Tax 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 10, 2002

Corp. v. City of East Orange, 19 N.J.Tax 469 (Tax 2001), the Essex County Board of Taxation dismissed the plaintiffs appeal for failure to pay taxes. Plaintiff then filed a complaint in the Tax Court. … Jefferson-Halsey Roads Assocs., L.P. v.

Akls Realty Associates, Inc. v. Township of Burlington

10 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 3, 1988

Compare Passaic v. … Lee Boro. v.

Township of North Bergen v. Hackensack Water Co.

26 N.J. Misc. 6 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 25, 1947

This action of the County Board is reviewable by the Division of Tax Appeals, Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 N. J. L. 37; 13 Atl. Rep. (2d) 479, and the appeal to this body is a hearing de novo. … City of Paterson v. Baker et al., 6 N. J. Mis. R. 4; 139 Atl.

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Borough of Wood-Ridge

2 N.J. Tax 143 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 29, 1981

In Atlantic City Hospital v. … See Azada v. Carson, supra.

City of Hoboken v. Trustees of Stevens Institute

11 N.J. Tax 70 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 6, 1990

Press v. Princeton, 35 N.J. 209 , 172 A. 2d 420 (1961); Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. v. Florham Park, 5 N.J.Tax 343 (Tax Ct.1983). … Jabert Operating Corp. v. Newark, 16 N.J.Super. 505, 85 A.2d 216 (App.Div. 1951); Shelton College v. Ringwood, 48 N.J.Super. 10 , 136 A.2d 660 (App.Div.1957); Catholic Relief Services, U.S.C.C. v.