Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjtaxct

1,253 results

0.61s

  • Cumberland Holding Corp. v. Vineland City

    11 N.J. Tax 457 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 20, 1991

    See Prospect Hill Apts. v. … Ailing Street Urban Renewal Co. v. Newark, 204 N.J.Super. 185,189 , 497 A.2d 1287 (App.Div.1988); McMillan v. Taxation Div. Director, 180 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hi-Nella Associates v. Hi-Nella Borough

    3 N.J. Tax 414 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 28, 1981

    Supreme Court Reports, 112], at 1126; George v. … In Springfield Tp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Borough of North Arlington v. Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc.

    25 N.J. Misc. 466 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 23, 1947

    Englewood v. Hopper, 54 N. J. L. 544; 23 Atl. Rep. 948 . … McMichael v. Horay, 90 N. J. L. 142; 100 Atl. Rep. 205 . Since the County Board was without jurisdiction to hear the appeal in the first instance, the appeal should have been dismissed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of Christ Church in Short Hills v. Township of Millburn

    26 N.J. Misc. 123 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 24, 1948

    State Board of Tax Appeals, 131 N. J. L. 57; 34 Atl. Rep. (2d) 740; Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra. … To the same effect is Stevens Institute v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 1094; 130 Atl. Rep. 925 , decided in 1925.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • ARP Realty Associates v. Washington Borough

    16 N.J. Tax 281 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 13, 1997

    In Veeder v. … Realty Assocs. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Borough of Wanaque v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission

    20 N.J. Misc. 232 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 2, 1942

    Rep. 35 ; Borough of Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1941), 127 N. J. L. 67; 21 Atl. … Stevens Institute v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1928), 105 N. J. L. 99; 143 Atl. Rep. 356 ; affirmed, Ibid. 655; 146 Atl. Rep. 919 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1939), 122 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • 1125-1127 Clinton Avenue Associates v. Town of Irvington

    2 N.J. Tax 386 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 28, 1981

    judgment “freeze” statute, the court in Newark v. … This case is distinguishable from the factual situation in Snyder v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Evesham Township v. Nye

    3 N.J. Tax 183 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 10, 1981

    timely filed. *186 In support of his position defendant cites Passaic v. … White v. Tax Appeals Bd., 123 N.J.L. 350, 353 , 8 A.2d 819 (Sup.Ct.1939); Fahey v. Jersey City, 52 N.J. 103, 107 , 244 A.2d 97 (1968).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Prospect Hill Apts. v. Flemington

    1 N.J. Tax 224 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 26, 1979

    Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488 , 70 A.2d 733 (1950); Clairol, Inc. v. Kingsley, 109 N.J. Super. 22 , 262 A.2d 213 (App.Div. 1970), aff'd 57 N.J. 199 , 270 A.2d 702 (1970). Cf. Danis v. Middlesex Cty. … White v. Violent Crimes Comp. Bd., 76 N.J. 368 , 379 , 388 A.2d 206 , 211 (1978).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Township of Neptune

    15 N.J. Tax 498 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 27, 1996

    N.J.S.A. 2A:34-3 sets out the requirements for a judgment of divorce from bed and board. In Lavino v. … In [divorce from bed and board] the marital bond subsists____” Id. at 639 , 130 A.2d 369 (citations omitted); Weinkrantz v. Weinkrantz 129 N.J.Super. 28, 32 , 322 A.2d 184 (App. Div.1974); Mueller v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • AVR Realty Co. v. Cranford Township

    16 N.J. Tax 550 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 20, 1997

    Switz v. … [by the 1995 assessment] and therefore [would have had] no occasion to appeal [to the county board or the Tax Court]. [Wayne Tp. v.

    Reversed by AVR Realty Co. v. Cranford Tp., 316 N.J. Super. 401 (1998)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Frisina v. City of Newark

    15 N.J. Tax 357 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 24, 1995

    Sites v. … Ltd. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bonsangue v. Little Egg Harbor Township

    17 N.J. Tax 439 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 17, 1998

    Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418, 425 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985). … See Tamburelli *445 Properties Ass’n. v. Cresskill Bor., 308 N.J.Super. 326, 336-37 , 705 A.2d 1270 (App.Div.1998); Brae Assocs. do Hertz Realty v. Park Ridge Bor., 17 N.J.Tax 187 (Tax 1998).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Spiotta Bros. v. Township of Mine Hill

    1 N.J. Tax 42 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 4, 1980

    Township’s contention that taxpayer cannot question the 1977 county board judgment by reason of its failure to file a cross-appeal is clearly erroneous. In Hackensack v. … Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952). The testimony here with regard to the 1975 county tax board judgment falls far short of satisfying that criteria.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of New Brunswick v. Upsilon Chapter of Delta Phi Fraternity of Rutgers University

    18 N.J. Misc. 147 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 5, 1940

    Washington Township v. Mercer County Board of Taxation (Supreme Court, 1914), 85 N. J. L. 547; 89 Atl. Rep. 1028 ; Mellor v. Kaighn (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1916), 89 N. J. L. 543; 99 Atl. Rep. 207 . … Workingmen’s Circle, Branch No. 90 v. Oily of Trenton (State Board), filed November 14th, 1939.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Campbell Soup Co. v. City of Camden

    16 N.J. Tax 219 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 16, 1996

    Partnership v. … Assocs. v. City of Hackensack, 2 N.J.Tax 392, 407 (Tax 1981)). This is the risk taxpayer took when it appealed the 1993 county board judgment to the Tax Court.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Venture 17 v. Hasbrouck Heights Borough

    12 N.J. Tax 152 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 6, 1991

    This court simply has no authority to hear the appeal from the county board dismissal because of plaintiff’s failure to meet the statute’s December 1 filing dead *156 line. 18 Washington Place Associates v. … The defalcations of the assessor, county board and tax collector which led to the invalidation of an added assessment in American Hydro Power v. Clifton, supra, are simply not present here.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Exxon Corp. v. East Brunswick Tp.

    5 N.J. Tax 216 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 16, 1982

    Co. of N.J. v. … In East Orange v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. City of Atlantic City

    15 N.J. Tax 576 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 17, 1996

    Schneider v. … In Inwood Owners, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rothman v. City of Hackensack

    1 N.J. Tax 438 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 26, 1980

    The evidence was in a state of equipoise and neither side overcame the presumption of correct *442 ness of the county board judgment with the required quality and quantity of proofs. Passaic v. … Greenwald v. Borough of Metuchen, *444 supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.