Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,253 results
0.59s
7 N.J. Tax 539 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 15, 1985
Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952); Passaic v. … Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed and the county board judgment was sustained. Similarly, in Inmar Associates, Inc. v.
Cited 23 timesPublished19 N.J. Misc. 600 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 9, 1941
In view of the foregoing, we need not reflect upon the propriety of the reversals by the county board of its prior determinations. But see City of Newark v. … Stevens Institute v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1928), 105 N. J. L. 99; 143 Atl. Rep. 356 ; C. F. Mueller Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1941), 126 N. J. L. 141; 18 Atl. Rep. (2d) 564.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 N.J. Tax 529 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 5, 1981
Press v. … Co. v.
Overruled on other grounds by Sabella v. Lacey Tp., 188 N.J. Super. 500 (1983)Cited 26 timesPublishedLittle Egg Harbor Township v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
9 N.J. Tax 314 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 27, 1987
by the county boards. … Corp. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedVerden Realty Management Co. v. City of East Orange
5 N.J. Tax 637 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 30, 1983
It is the power as well as the duty of this court to determine the jurisdictional sufficiency of county board actions. N.J.S.A. 54:2-35; Veeder v. … The failure to make such payments by the time the county board petition is filed is not an absolute jurisdictional bar to maintenance of the appeal. Lecross Assoc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBass River Township v. Driscoll
3 N.J. Tax 177 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 5, 1981
The municipality decided to appeal from the aforesaid county board judgment. … Horrobin v. Director, 1 N.J.Tax 213 (Tax Ct.1979); Prospect Hills, supra; Salem City, supra; Galloway Twp. v. Petkevis, 2 N.J.Tax 85 (Tax Ct.1981).
Cited 8 timesPublishedWest Essex Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Montville Township
16 N.J. Tax 152 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 27, 1996
VSH Realty Inc. v. Harding Tp., 291 N.J.Super. 295 , 677 A.2d 274 (App.Div.1996). The defendant’s motion was then rescheduled. … In *156 Pipquarryco, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished3 N.J. Tax 590 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 4, 1981
The Legislature did not use “assessed valuation” for hearings before the county board of taxation and “judgment of the county board of taxation” for hearings before the Tax Court. In Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. … At no place in the opiniott is there any reference to the judgment of the county board of taxation. *596 In Feder v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPowder Mill I Associates v. Township of Hamilton
3 N.J. Tax 439 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 2, 1981
Lecross Asso. v. … In State v.
Reversed on other grounds by Powder Mill I Assoc. v. Hamilton Tp., 190 N.J. Super. 63 (1983)Cited 49 timesPublishedBorough of North Arlington v. Riverview Gardens
26 N.J. Misc. 72 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 6, 1948
Englewood v. Hopper, 54 N. J. L. 544; 23 Atl. Rep. 948 . … In the absence of such an allegation, the county board was without power to hear the appeals. If the county board was not vested with jurisdiction to hear the appeals, neither are we. Oradell v.
Cited 1 timesPublished22 N.J. Misc. 16 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 15, 1943
Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization, 78 N. J. L. 302; 72 Atl. Rep. 966 ; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals), 78 N. J. L. 439; 74 Atl. Rep. 480 ; Hoboken v. Lamport & Holt Line, N. J. … In Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes (Supreme Court), 76 N. J. L. 402; 70 Atl. Rep. 978 , Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTownship of Cherry Hill v. United States Life Insurance
176 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 20, 1980
The prior action of the county board, while entitled to a presumption of correctness, North Bergen Twp., Hudson County v. Dieckmann’s Estate, 37 N.J.Super. 221 (App. … In State v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedPhillipsburg Riverview Organization, Inc. v. Town of Phillipsburg
26 N.J. Tax 167 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 16, 2011
This court observes that County Boards of Taxation are quasi-judicial bodies but not courts within the intent and meaning of R. 1:21—1 (c). Vicari v. … The Board never determined whether PRO could appear pro se or whether R. 1:21-1 (c) was applicable to proceedings before County Boards of Taxation. See arguendo Stack v. P.G.
Cited 11 timesPublished25 N.J. Tax 479 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 25, 2010
See, e.g., Switz v. … Becker, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRainhold Holding Co. v. Freehold Township
15 N.J. Tax 420 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 2, 1996
Boys’ Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Jefferson Tp., 72 N.J. 389, 405 , 371 A.2d 22 (1977). The clear import of Newark v. Fischer, supra and Boys’ Club of Clifton, Inc. v. … In Southgate Realty Assocs. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCity of Jersey City v. Harborside Warehouse Co.
19 N.J. Misc. 222 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 21, 1941
State Board (Supreme Court, 1886), 49 N. J. L. 1; 7 Atl. Rep. 306 ; and see Turnley v. Elizabeth (Supreme Court 1908), 76 N. J. L. 42; 68 Atl. Rep. 1094 ; Theodore Schetty v. … Second National Bank and Trust Company of Red Bank v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1935), 114 N. J. L. 573; 178 Atl. Rep. 96 ; General Motors Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMase Land Co. v. Jefferson Township
20 N.J. Tax 439 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 4, 2002
In Gale Builders, Inc. v. Hunterdon Cty. … In Throckmorton v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of Camden v. Camden Masonic Ass'n
9 N.J. Tax 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 7, 1987
Jersey City v. … [Little Egg Harbor Tp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSouth Plainfield Borough v. Kentile Floors, Inc.
183 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 15, 1981
In Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. … Hudson Terrace Apartments v. Fort Lee, 2 N.J.Tax 457 (Tax Ct. 1981). In Springfield Tp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Haworth
19 N.J. Misc. 217 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 4, 1941
Emerson v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1928), 6 N. J. Mis. R. 326; 141 Atl. Rep. 23 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Haworth, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 604. … State Board (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 133; 183 Atl. Rep. 866 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1939), 122 N. J. L. 596; 7 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna