Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.64s

  • Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM

    202 N.J. Super. 312 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1985

    Super. 312 (1985) 495 A.2d 119 CHARLIE BROWN OF CHATHAM, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … Plaintiff, Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Review

    117 N.J. Super. 399 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1971

    BROWN, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND SOPHIA, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … The Board of Review agreed with the decision of the Appeal Tribunal, which denied benefits. The latter based its disqualification of claimant in reliance upon Stauhs v. Board of Review, 93 N.J. Super. 451 (App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • NANCY G. SLUTSKY VS. KENNETH J. SLUTSKY (FM-14-1535-08, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)

    451 N.J. Super. 332 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 2017

    Certainly, a factfinder may accept or reject expert testimony in whole or in part, Brown v. Brown, 348 N.J. Super. 466, 478 (App. … In Stern v.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Brown

    233 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1989

    In Georgia v. Suruda, 154 N.J.Super. 439 (Law Div.1977), the court considered the purpose underlying the dates set forth in N.J.S.A. 18A:12-8 for appointment of Board of Education members in cities of the first class. … See N.J.S.A. 18A:12-3; Golaine v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Foley

    218 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1987

    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 739-740 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541-1542 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 (1983); see also United States v. … Texas v. Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at 740 , 103 S.Ct. at 1542 ; see also State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 496-497 (1962), cert. den. 374 U.S. 835 , 83 S.Ct. 1879 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1055 (1963).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    208 N.J. Super. 372 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1986

    Super. 372 (1986) 506 A.2d 29 LEANDER BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KENNETH BROWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 4, 1986. … Plaintiff Leander Brown filed a divorce complaint against defendant Kenneth A. Brown on March 27, 1981, seeking to dissolve their nearly 22-year marriage on the ground of extreme cruelty.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    348 N.J. Super. 466 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 2002

    Super. 466 Ellen BROWN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 20, 2001. Decided February 28, 2002. *465 Sheldon A. … In Lavene v.

    Declined to follow by In Re Marriage of Thornhill, 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1396 (2008)Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Klug v. BRIDGEWATER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

    407 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2009

    v. … We emphasize that a planning board is not required to accept the testimony of any expert. El Shaer v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    28 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 1953

    BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 19, 1953. Decided October 27, 1953. *168 Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART. … Brown v. Brown, 19 N.J. Super. 432 ( Ch. Div. 1952). On appeal, this court, in Brown v. Brown, 24 N.J. Super. 198 ( App.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    34 N.J. Super. 261 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1954

    Super. 261 (1954) 112 A.2d 1 MARY LOUISE BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided February 28, 1954. *263 Mr. Thomas E. Fitzgerald, attorney for plaintiff. … In Lindquist v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    323 N.J. Super. 30 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1999

    BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eleanore BROWN, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carlton C. Brown, Sr., Brown Roofing Company, Inc., Brown & Guarino, Inc., Terri L. Brown and Carlton C. … See Strasenburgh v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    147 N.J. Super. 156 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1977

    BROWN, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUTH GILMAN BROWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 1, 1977. Decided February 11, 1977. … See Butler v. Buenaga, 107 N.J. Super. 80, 82-83 (App. Div. 1969), mod. on other grounds sub nom. Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc., 56 N.J. 567 (1970).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    196 N.J. Super. 92 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1984

    . *94 Judith Brown, plaintiff, and Thomas Brown, defendant, were divorced on January 25, 1984 and he now lives with Tressa Brett. … Brown objects to the transfer on the theory that Judith Brown is trying to avoid appearing in the municipal court where the judge had previously admonished her not to repeat this behavior. Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    24 N.J. Super. 198 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1953

    BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 3, 1952. Decided January 5, 1953. *200 Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and CONLON. … Perlman v. Perlman , above; Kempson v. Kempson, 61 N.J. Eq. 303, 311 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    19 N.J. Super. 432 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

    BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided May 13, 1952. *434 Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys for plaintiff. Messrs. … Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 , 65 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed. 1577 ( U.S. Sup. Ct. 1945); Tonti v. Chadwick, 1 N.J. 531 ( Sup. Ct. 1949); Sprague v. Sprague, 131 N.J. Eq. 104 ( E. & A. 1941); Isserman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    19 N.J. Super. 431 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

    BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided May 13, 1952. Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys for plaintiff. Messrs. … Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541 , 68 S.Ct. 1213 , 92 L.Ed. 1561 , 1 A.L.R. 1413 (1948); Kreiger v. Kreiger, 334 U.S. 555 , 68 S.Ct. 1221 , 92 L.Ed. 1572 (1948).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    223 N.J. Super. 68 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 1987

    See Schlemm v. Schlemm, 31 N.J. 557 (1960); Smith v. Smith, 72 N.J. 350, 360 (1977); Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 148 (1980). … For example, see the Kentucky case of Peterson v. Peterson, 583 S.W.2d 707 (Ky.Ct.App.1979). It is nevertheless interesting that the Supreme Court of Montana in the case of Reilly v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ramsey

    247 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1991

    However, a zoning board, as any administrative agency, cannot be equated with courts. Kramer v. Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 284, 289 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965). … In Peoples Trust Co. of Bergen Cty. v. Board of Adj. of Bor. of Hasbrouck Heights, 60 N.J.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Advance at Branchburg II, LLC v. Township Of branchburg Board of Adjustment

    433 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 2013

    Nevertheless, we "recognize the board's knowledge of local circumstances and accord deference to its interpretation." Fallone, supra, 369 N.J. Super. at 562; accord DePetro v. … That determination will govern whether we apply the Sica or Medici standard to our review of the Board's actions. Advance relies on our decision in Homes of Hope, Inc. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Hamel v. State

    321 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1999

    Winters v. … To the contrary, school boards are "instrumentalit[ies] of the State," Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189, 199 , 180 A.2d 136 (1962), supported not by charitable contributions, but by taxes and government aid.

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.