Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.61s
NY & SUBURBAN FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N v. Sanderman
162 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 15, 1978
Association urges that under the decisions in Zanzonico v. Zanzonico, 2 N.J. 309 (1949), cert. den. 338 U.S. 868 , 70 S.Ct. 143 , 94 L.Ed. 532 (1949); Newark v. Sue Corp., *220 124 N.J. Super. 5, 7-8 (App. … Shaeffer v. Chambers, 6 N.J. Eq. 548 (Ch. 1847); cf. Taylor v. Morris, 1 N.J. Super. 410 (Ch. Div. 1948).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWinfield, Etc., Corp. v. Middlesex, Etc., Corp.
39 N.J. Super. 92 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 1956
Feeney v. Bardsley, 66 N.J.L. 239 ( E. & A. 1901); Borus Waton, Inc., v. Henn, 108 N.J.L. 514, 516 ( E. & A. 1932); Dyer v. Lintz, 76 N.J.L. 204 ( Sup. Ct. 1908); Globe Home Improvement Co. v. … Krevolin & Co., Inc., v. Brown, 20 N.J. Super. 85 ( App. Div. 1952); Palmeri v. Albanese, 12 N.J. Super. 338, 342 ( App. Div. 1951).
Cited 19 timesPublished23 N.J. Super. 558 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1952
Brown, attorney). Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for defendant-appellant ( Mr. Meyer L. Sakin, attorney). The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned). … As the Court of Errors and Appeals said in State v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedKIRK EADY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 2020
A-5434-17T3 KIRK EADY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 206 N.J. 14, 27 (2011) (citing In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27 (2007)). We accord deference to the Board's fact-finding, Circus Liquors, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished157 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1978
State v. Whittle, 52 N.J. 407, 411-412 (1968); State v. South, 136 N.J. Super. 402, 410-411 (App. Div. 1975), certif. den. 69 N.J. 387 (1976); State v. Gibson, 150 N.J. Super. 351, 358 (App. Div. 1977); cf. State v. … If and when such a situation materializes, it is a factor for the State Parole Board to consider to prevent any undesirable detention. State v. Clark, supra, 65 N.J. at 436-437.
Cited 2 timesPublished139 N.J. Super. 330 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1976
In Davis v. … Super. 388 , (J.D.R.C. 1974), and State v. Brown, 132 N.J. Super. 584 , (Law Div. 1975), both permitted the use of a juvenile transcript for the purpose of confrontation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Freshwater Wetlands General Permit
379 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 2005
In July 1998, the predecessors to the developer of "The Sanctuary" received final approval from the Planning Board to sections III, IV and V of the project. … Soon thereafter, timber rattlesnakes were observed in the development and the Commission issued a call-up to review the Planning Board approval. Ibid.
Cited 23 timesPublishedTheckston v. Triangle Publications, Inc.
100 N.J. Super. 452 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1968
New York Times Co. v. … Beckley Newspapers Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished221 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1987
See Matter of Board of Educ. of Town of Boonton, 99 N.J. 523, 536 (1985), cert. den. sub nom. Kramer v. Public Employment Relations Commission, 475 U.S. 1072 , 106 S.Ct. 1388 , 89 L.Ed. 2d 613 (1986); Nieder v. … See *586 also Yanhko v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedJOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC., LOCAL 687 v. Pollino
39 N.J. Super. 250 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1956
(c) To peaceably give up said Shop Card on demand of the local union or local executive board, through its duly appointed representative, for the violation of any local or International laws. … But see Di Leo v. Daneault, 329 Mass. 590 , 109 N.E. 2 d 824 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. 1953); Wisconsin Emp. Rel. Board v. Journeymen Barbers, etc., 256 Wis. 77 , 39 N.W. 2 d 725 ( Sup. Ct. 1949); Journeymen Barbers, etc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished253 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1991
State v. Todd, 238 N.J. Super. 445 , 570 A. 2d 20 (App.Div. 1990). See also State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. 429 , 547 A. 2d 743 (Law Div. 1988). But see State v. Cengiz, 241 N.J. … State v.
Reversed by State v. Shaw, 131 N.J. 1 (1993)Cited 6 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 14, 2025
C.C. v. J.A.H., 463 N.J. Super. 419, 428 (App. Div. 2020) (quoting J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 482 (2011)). … Div. 2018) (quoting State v. Brown, 394 N.J. Super. 492, 504 (App. Div. 2007)); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-18.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished105 N.J. Super. 514 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1969
Almeida v. Rundle, 383 F. 2 d 421 (3 Cir. 1967). The common law did not recognize degrees of murder. Murder in either of the statutory degrees in our State was murder at common law. State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405 (1956). … Murphy v. Zink, supra ; Lloyd v. Vermeulen, 22 N.J. 200 (1956).
Cited 20 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 2019
A court "may not substitute its judgment for that of the board unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion." Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. at 284. … See Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. 263, 284 (2013).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished39 N.J. Super. 463 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1956
GOVIA AND MARY HURBANS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LUDWIG GOETZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 12, 1956. … See Friedman v. Podell, 21 N.J. 100 (1956). Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished194 N.J. Super. 326 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1984
State v. Green, 86 N.J. 281, 291-293 (1981); State v. Melvin, 65 N.J. 1, 18 (1974). This error requires reversal of the judgment. … See Evid.R. 56(2); State v. Cavallo, 88 N.J. 508, 517-518 (1982); Nesta v. Meyer, 100 N.J. Super. 434 (App.Div. 1968).
Cited 21 timesPublished71 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1962
Guided by Russo v. United States Trucking Corp., 26 N.J. 430 (1958), and Ricciardi v. Marcalus Mfg. … Estelle v. Board of Education of Red Bank, 26 N.J. Super. 9, 25 ( App. Div. 1953); Hull v. Hercules Powder Co., 20 N.J. Misc. 168, 171 , 26 A. 2 d 164 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); Temple v. Storch Trucking Co., 29 N.J.
Cited 13 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 14, 2020
A-0370-19T3 ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Badiali v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Group, 220 N.J. 544, 556 (2015) (citing Cty. Coll. of Morris Staff Ass'n v. Cty. Coll. of Morris, 100 N.J. 383, 390 (1985)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished421 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 22, 2011
After citing our decision in Silver v. … Brennan v. Orban, 145 N.J. 282, 298 , 678 A.2d 667 (1996).
Cited 50 timesPublishedASHISH KUMAR v. PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP COUNCIL (L-5017-21, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 2022
Resolution #21-307 authorized a public question that read, "Should the Township of Piscataway broadcast its Township Council, Planning Board and Zoning Board meetings on PCTV and online when the cost of doing so is estimated … Meehan v. Antonellis, 226 N.J. 216, 232 (2016) (quoting Shelton v. Restaurant, Inc., 214 N.J. 419, 428-29 (2013)). The best indicator of that intent is the statutory language itself. DiProspero v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna