Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Hudson Regional Hospital, Etc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 2023

    (AIG), Defendant-Respondent. ______________________________ Argued December 7, 2022 – Decided November 16, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. … McDaniel v. Lee, 419 N.J. Super. 482, 490 (App. Div. 2011) (quoting Ahammed v. Logandro, 394 N.J. Super. 179, 190 (App. Div. 2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rox v. Department of Civil Service

    141 N.J. Super. 463 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1976

    In Newark the 61 candidates were divided among seven boards of examiners (each hereinafter referred to as the "team"). … Kelly v. Civil Service Comm'n, 37 N.J. 450, 460 (1962).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Davis v. City of Plainfield

    389 N.J. Super. 424 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 2006

    See Lynch v. … Gillen v. Sheil, 174 N.J.Super. 386 , 416 A. 2d 935 (Law Div.1980); see New Jersey Land Title Ins. Rating Bureau v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Dreher

    302 N.J. Super. 408 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1997

    V. … Subsequently, in State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595 , 573 A.2d 886 (1990), the Supreme Court addressed the admissibility for impeachment purposes of evidence of pre-arrest silence that significantly preceded an arrest.

    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 170 N.J. 138 (2001)Cited 35 timesPublished
  • ELLEN SCHWARTZ VS. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2020

    (quoting Smith v. State, 309 N.J. Super. 209, 215 (App. Div. 2007))). Plaintiff's final argument addresses the Board's requirement for repayment. … See, e.g., Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N.J. 179, 196 (1975); Vliet v. Bd. of Trs., Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., 156 N.J. Super. 83, 90 (App. Div. 1978); Indursky v. Bd. of Trs., Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., 137 N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fusco v. Fusco

    186 N.J. Super. 321 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1982

    Div. 1976); Hoy v. Willis, 165 N.J. Super. 265, 271-272 (App.Div. 1978). Cf. M.P. v. S.P., 169 N.J. Super. 425 (App.Div. 1979). … As we previously held in Wagner v. Wagner, 165 N.J.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Kessler v. Troum

    162 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1978

    The applicable statute defined "physician" as "one who has been duly authorized and licensed by the state medical board to engage in the general practice of medicine." … See People v. DeFrance, supra, 62 N.W. at 712 ; Howe v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Walter A. Tormasi

    443 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 2015

    State v. … Rules of Evidence, comment 6 on N.J.R.E. 803(c)(25) (2015); accord Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302, 93 S. Ct. 1038, 1049, 35 L. Ed. 2d 297, 312-13 (1973); State v. Brown, 170 N.J. 138, 153 (2000).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • DeVito v. Mullen's Roofing Co.

    72 N.J. Super. 233 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1962

    Bober v. Independent Plating Corp., 28 N.J. 160, 167 (1958); Fusco v. Cambridge Piece Dyeing Corp., 135 N.J.L. 160, 162 ( E. & A. 1946). Compare Markant v. Hommer Tool & Mfg. Co., 28 N.J. Super. 566 ( Cty. … Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co., 27 N.J. 127, 139 (1958); Bober v. Independent Plating Corp., supra, at p. 168. The juridical philosophy recently enunciated by our Supreme Court in Dwyer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Dittmar

    188 N.J. Super. 364 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1982

    the judgment was “to the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center at Avenel for an indeterminate term not to exceed ten years on the Accusation” and required defendant to pay a $25 penalty to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board … State v. Andrews, 105 N.J.Super. 62, 64-65 (App.Div.1969), remanded on other grounds 56 N.J. 372 (1970). It is no longer correct under the Code of Criminal Justice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • EDWARD FLEMMING VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 2020

    A-2390-18T1 EDWARD FLEMMING, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. … Our standard of review of administrative decisions by the Board is limited and "grounded in strong public policy concerns and practical realities." Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sullivan v. Combustion Engineering

    248 N.J. Super. 134 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1991

    Lesniak v. … Westphal v. Guarino, 163 N.J. Super. 139, 145 , 394 A. 2d 377 (App.Div.), aff'd o.b., 78 N.J. 308 , 394 A. 2d 354 (1978); Brown v. Mortimer, 100 N.J.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Loigman v. Kings Landing Condominium Ass'n

    324 N.J. Super. 97 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 1999

    .___, 118 S.Ct. 627 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 607 (1997); the Tenth Circuit, Ladick v. VanGemert, 146 F. 3d 1205, 1206 (10th Cir.1998); and the Eleventh Circuit, Brown v. … See, e.g., Ditty v. CheckRite, Ltd., Inc., 973 F.Supp. 1320, 1329 (D.Utah 1997); Trull v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership, 961 F.Supp. 1199, 1205 (N.D.Ill. 1997); Rabideau v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • STEPHANIE BOLASCI VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 2020

    A-3536-18T1 STEPHANIE BOLASCI, Appellant, v. … Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210 (1997). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. D.C.W.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2025

    See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432 (1995); State v. Hyppolite, 236 N.J. 154, 165 (2018). In Brady v. … State v. Brown, 236 N.J. 497, 518 (2019) (citing State v. Nelson, 155 N.J. 487, 497 (1998)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Thering v. Reinkemeyer

    117 N.J. Super. 176 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 1971

    Konitch v. Hartung, 81 N.J. Super. 376, 382 (App. Div. 1963). … Cuna v. Board of Fire Comm'rs, Avenel, 42 N.J. 292, 298 (1964); Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc., 35 N.J. 588 , 590 *183 (1961); Volek v. Deal, 83 N.J. Super. 58, 63 (App. Div. 1964).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lakewood Citizens for Integrity in Government, Inc. v. Lakewood Township Committee

    306 N.J. Super. 500 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1997

    N.J.S.A. 10:4— 21; Polillo v. Deane, 74 N.J. 562, 578 , 379 A.2d 211 (1977). In Rice v. … See also, Jenkins v. Newark Board of Education, 166 N.J.Super. 357 , 399 A.2d 1034 (Law Div.1979) aff'd, 166 N.J.Super. 300 , 399 A.2d 1005 (App.Div.1979).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bi-County Dev. of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge

    341 N.J. Super. 229 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2001

    Corp. v. … Bi-County also relies upon Samaritan Center, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Vinegra

    134 N.J. Super. 432 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 1975

    In United States v. … See State v. Williams, supra, 59 N.J. at 502 ; State v. De Cola, 33 N.J. 335, 342 (1960); State v. Browning, 19 N.J. 424 (1955); State v. Stavola, 118 N.J. Super. 393 (App. Div. 1972); State v. Sibilia, supra, 88 N.J.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Waste Management of New Jersey, Inc. v. Morris County Municipal Utilities Authority

    433 N.J. Super. 445 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 2013

    In the absence of any legal 1 Crowe v. … See also Brown v. City of Paterson, 424 N.J. Super. 176, 183 (App. Div. 2012).

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.