Case law

MARK G. MONTENERO VS. TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD (L-0423-18, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 2020

MONTENERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See Bosland v.

DAVID GARNETT VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 2020

A-0783-18T1 DAVID GARNETT, Appellant, v. … Our review of final decisions of the Board is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 457 N.J. Super. 87, 93 (App. Div. 2018).

DAVID COLLINS VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 2020

A-3128-18T2 DAVID COLLINS, Appellant, v. … Williams v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 336 N.J. Super. 1, 7 (App. Div. 2000).

IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF LOCAL ETHICS BOARD DECISIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 21, 2020

Grabowsky v. Twp of Montclair, 221 N.J. 536, 553 (2015) (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.2 (c)). 6 The complaints before the Board also alleged violations of subsection (f). … Sav. & Loan Ass'n v.

In Re Presentment to Superior Court

14 N.J. Super. 542 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1951

O'Regan v. Schermerhorn, supra . … The case is similar to O'Regan v. Schermerhorn, supra , and is not in point.

Randazzo v. Township of Washington

286 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 26, 1995

In Abel v. … Although the Supreme Court in Lamb v.

Township of Howell v. Fred McDowell, Inc.

300 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1997

Thereafter, the Monmouth County Board of Freeholders adopted a resolution approving the proposed amendment which included the designation of the McDowell property as a Class B recycling center. … Holgate Property Assocs. v. Township of Howell, 145 N.J. 590, 603 , 679 A.2d 613 (1996).

In Re Fortenbach

119 N.J. Super. 124 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1972

State v. *129 Blinsinger, 114 N.J. Super. 318, 320 (App. Div. 1971). This was tellingly illustrated in Schware v. … Similarly, in Coyne v.

K. S. B. Technical Sales Corp. v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission

151 N.J. Super. 218 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1977

A. 52:33-2 is unconstitutional in this context accords with the decision of the California District Court of Appeal in Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Board of Comm’rs of Dept. of W. & 0 P., 276 Cal. App. 2d 221, 80 Gal. … Turco Paving Con., Inc. v. City Council of Orange, 89 N. J. Super. 93, 103 (App. Div. 1965) ; Belousofsky v. Board of Education of City of Linden, 54 N. J. Super. 219, 223 (App. Div. 1957); Case v. Trenton, 76 N. J.

Stott v. Greengos

95 N.J. Super. 96 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1967

See Mahoney v. Minsky, 39 N.J. 208 (1963); Hackensack Hospital v. Tiajoloff, 85 N.J. Super. 417 ( App. Div. 1964); Fagan v. City of Newark, 78 *100 N.J. Super. 294 ( App. Div. 1963); Webber v. McCormick, 63 N.J. … The Permanent Editorial Board considered the California variation but rejected it because "it merely states the obvious proposition that a contract between principal and agent by which the latter buys or sells for account

Ig v. Dmahs

386 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 2006

In an August 11, 2004 letter, the Ocean County Board of Social Services warned J.K. that waiving I.G.'s spousal elective *842 share would "result in termination of Medicaid benefits." I.G.' … Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210 , 704 A. 2d 547 (1997).

Adler v. Livak

308 N.J. Super. 219 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1998

See Clifton v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation, 28 N.J. 411, 422 , 147 A.2d 1 (1958); Borough of North Haledon v. … N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3d; see also Weston v. State, 60 N.J. 36, 43 , 286 A.2d 43 (1972).

Sprankle v. Adamar of NJ, Inc.

388 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 2005

See Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 96 N.J. 336, 346 , 476 A. 2d 250 (1984); Crews v. Garmoney, 141 N.J.Super. 93, 96 , 357 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.1976). … Vitti v. Brown, 359 N.J.Super. 40, 49 , 818 A. 2d 384 (Law Div. 2003). In addition, there should be some showing that counsel has a legitimate and substantial need for the additional discovery requested.

Dcpp v. K.N. and Biological Father of E.N., Whomsoever He May Be, in the Matter of E.N.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 2024

D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 246 (2012) (internal citations omitted). … Polzo v. Cnty. of Essex, 196 N.J. 569, 583 (2008) (quoting State v. Townsend, 186 N.J. 473, 494 (2006)). "The net opinion rule . . .

Newark Div. of Public Welfare v. Ragin

197 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1984

Pascucci v. Vagott, supra 71 N.J. at 50 . … Abelson's, Inc. v. N.J. State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412, 423-24 (1950). Here the legislative purpose was to furnish relief but at the same time to coerce work.

In Re Referendum Petition to Repeal Ordinance 04-75

388 N.J. Super. 405 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 25, 2006

See Jansco v. Waldron, 70 N.J. 320, 323-24 (1976). … Similarly, in Nolan v. Witkowski, 56 N.J. Super. 480, 496 (App.

State v. Lopez

188 N.J. Super. 170 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1983

See State v. Ingenito, 87 N.J. 204 (1981). … See State v. McCloskey, 90 N.J. 18, 22 (1982) (validity of statement under Miranda rule [1] ); State v. Lutz, 165 N.J. Super. 278, 281 (App.Div. 1979) ( Miranda statement and Wade [2] identification questions); State v.

Ricker v. Lawson

155 N.J. Super. 536 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 1977

Wagner v. Newark, 24 N. J. 467, 478 (1957). … Inganamort v. Fort Lee, 62 N. J. 521, 530 (1973).

In Re

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2017

In particular, Silver noted, id. at 50, that in Demech v. Board of Review, 167 N.J. Super. 35 (App. … Silver next addressed our opinion in Smith v. Board of Review, 281 N.J. Super. 426 (App.

NEW JERSEY CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER, INC. VS. TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-0549-17, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 2020

Kramer v. Bd. of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 296-97 (1965). … Sica v. Bd. of Adjustment, 127 N.J. 152, 160-61 (1992).