Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.97s

  • Capone v. Norton

    11 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1951

    Stephens v. Public Service Coord. Transport, 5 N.J. Super. 128 ( App. Div. 1949); Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co., 8 N.J. Super. 208 ( App. Div. 1950). … Cooper v. Shore Electric Co., 63 N.J.L. 558 ( E. & A. 1899); McStay v. Przychocki, 10 N.J. Super. 455 ( App. Div. Dec. 1950).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Int'l. Sch. Serv. v. W. Windsor Tp.

    412 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 2010

    In addition to serving as president of ISS and a board member of ISS and ISF, Dr. … Press v. Borough of Princeton, 35 N.J. 209, 214 , 172 A. 2d 420 (1961); Essex Props. Urban Renewal Assocs., Inc. v. City of Newark, 20 N.J.Tax 360, 365 (2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Indyk v. Klink

    121 N.J. Super. 314 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 1972

    See generally, Handlon v. Belleville, 4 N.J. 99, 104-105 (1950). … Compare, Hutt v. Robbins, 98 N.J. Super. 99 (App. Div. 1967), certif. den. 51 N.J. 185 (1968).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • RALPH HOLT VS. UPPER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-0157-17, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 2020

    Because the parties' arguments were not presented to the Board, they are matters outside the record that we cannot consider. See Schmidt v. … of Bergen Cty. v. Bd. of Adjustment, 60 N.J. Super. 569, 575-76 (App. Div. 1959) (stating "[j]udicial review of board of adjustment action is confined to the record made before the local board").

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Maurice D. Ross

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2026

    . _______________________ Argued February 3, 2026 – Decided March 4, 2026 Before Judges Gooden Brown, Rose and DeAlmeida. … Mauriello testified he purchased his own BWC while working for the Newark Board of Education before he was employed by the NHA.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Menichetti v. Palermo Supply Co.

    396 N.J. Super. 118 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 10, 2007

    See also Davala v. … See Gorman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Wayne Tp.

    8 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1950

    Nectow v. Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183 , 72 L.Ed. 842 ; Gabrielson v. Glen Ridge, 13 N.J. Misc. 142 , 176 A. 676 ; Phillips v. Township Council, &c., Teaneck, supra ; Phillips Oil Co. v. … Resciniti v. Board of Commissioners, Belleville, 117 N.J.L. 1 , 186 A. 439 ; Watchung Lake, Inc. v. Mobus, 119 N.J.L. 272 , 196 A. 223 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Watford Specialty Insurance Company v. Mdf 92 River Street, LLC

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 2023

    Birch Hoboken, Matthew Garcia, and Dashon Brown, HUD-L-0497-20 (the Mucha lawsuit). … Flomerfelt v. Cardiello, 202 N.J. 432, 441 (2010) (first citing Kampf v. Franklin Life Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cwiklinski v. Burton

    217 N.J. Super. 506 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 1987

    In Borgia v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. … Cook v. Phillips, 109 N.J.L. 371, 373 (E. & A. 1932). (Emphasis supplied). Cf. Reaves v. Mandell, 209 N.J.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Fusco v. City of Union City

    261 N.J. Super. 332 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 1993

    Super. 332 (1993) 618 A.2d 914 LOUIS FUSCO, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF UNION CITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND C & C REALTY AND C & C ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY, ST. … Bank of Huron, S.D. v. Fuller, 52 F. 2d 870, 874-75 (8th Cir.1931); Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Goodman, 55 Fla. 361, 368-69 , 45 So. 995 , 997 (1908); Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Mfg.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • MARTIN E. O'BOYLE VS. ANTHONY DILORENZO, JR. MARTIN E. BOYLE VS. THE BOROUGH OF LONGPORT (L-1985-09 AND L-3692-10, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 2018

    O'BOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Although at one time defendant Isen had been on the Borough's Planning Board, he left that position in 2008.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Ortiz

    187 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 12, 1982

    As appears to have been the situation in State v. … State v. Butler, supra .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • S.T. VS. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-4178-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 2020

    Fritsche v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 55 N.J. 322, 330 (1970); see also Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 7 (1969). … Johnson v. Scaccetti, 192 N.J. 256, 281 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Piscopo v. Piscopo

    231 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 24, 1988

    Their arrangement required that defendant attend to plaintiff's every personal special need while keeping house, bearing and raising their child and being a sounding board for plaintiff's artistic ideas. … Edison v. Edison Polyform & Mfg. Co., 73 N.J. Eq. 136 (Ch. 1907); Carson v. Here's Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc., 698 F. 2d 831 (6 Cir.1987); Canessa v. Kislak, Inc. 97 N.J. Super. 327, 351 (Law Div. 1967); Palmer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The Diocese of Trenton v. Toman 74 N.J. Eq. 702 (1908)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1908

    The case of French v. Marstin, ubi supra , was this: M owned what he called his "mountain pasture," consisting of the Bean, the Brown and the Scheafe lots. … He contended that he had the right of way to this pasture over the land of F, but there was no *Page 710 evidence that he had any such right to the Brown and Scheafe lots.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DEBRA LEVIN VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 2021

    A-4031-18 DEBRA LEVIN, Appellant, v. … The Supreme Court thereafter clarified the scope of the standard in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) by approvingly quoting the Board of Review's holding in De Lorenzo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Marko v. Zurich North America Insurance

    386 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 2006

    More recently in Board of Educ. of the City of Newark v. … In Lehmann v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Racing Commission v. Elliot

    290 N.J. Super. 140 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 1996

    Instead, relying on the expressed intent of the governing regulatory scheme, N.J.A.C. 13:71-23.1(a); see Dare v. … On appeal, the trainers argue that they were denied due process of law by reason of the conduct of the “Executive Director [in] tampering with the board of judges [thereby tainting] the entire administrative process,” and

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Quayle v. Tricon Construction of North Jersey, Inc.

    295 N.J. Super. 640 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1996

    Serraino, supra, at 490 , 550 A.2d 178 , citing Hiller & Skoglund, Inc. v. … See Eagle Fire Protection Corp. v. First *645 Indemnity of America Ins.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Goodpasture v. Goodpasture

    115 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 1971

    Clark v. Brown, 101 N.J. Super. 405 (Law Div. 1968); West Jersey Title, etc., Co. v. Industrial Trust Co., 27 N.J. 144 (1958). … Naumberg v. Young, 44 N.J.L. 331 (Sup. Ct. 1882); Farber v. Shell Oil Co., 47 N.J. Super. 48 (App. Div. 1957); Casriel v. King, 2 N.J. 45 (1949).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.